Validation of surgeon-performed emergency abdominal ultrasonography in pediatric trauma patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(98)90455-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Background/Purpose: The focused assessment for the sonographic evaluation of trauma patients (FAST) in adults is effective in detecting intraperitoneal and intrapericardial fluid and can be performed quickly by surgeons in the emergency department (ED). The authors sought to validate the accuracy of FAST performed by surgeons during ED resuscitation of pediatric trauma patients.

Methods: Patients were assigned to one of three groups based on standard clinical criteria: immediate surgery, abdominal computed tomography (CT), or observation alone. FAST was then performed in the ED by a surgery resident (postgraduate year 3 or higher) or an attending trauma surgeon. Four views were used to assess the possible presence of fluid in the pericardial, subphrenic, subhepatic, and pelvic spaces. Time needed to conduct FAST was noted. Presence of peritoneal or pericardial fluid by FAST was compared with that determined by CT or surgery. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated. For those who did not undergo CT or surgery, FAST findings were compared with the clinical course.

Results: Technically adequate studies could be performed on 192 of 196 eligible children. Their ages ranged from 3 months to 14 years (mean, 6.9 years); 119 were boys (62%), and 188 (98%) had sustained a blunt injury. FAST was performed in a mean time of 3.9 minutes (range, 1–17 minutes). All FAST examinations were reviewed by our senior surgeon-sonographer (GSR). Interrater agreement between the performing and reviewing surgeon-sonographer was 100%. Sixty (31%) patients underwent either abdominal CT (n = 56; mean Injury Severity Score (ISS), 9.6) or immediate operation (n = 4; mean ISS, 18.8). Of the 10 patients with verified presence of intraperitoneal fluid, eight had positive and two had falsenegative FAST examination results. Of the 50 patients with verified absence of intraperitoneal fluid, none had a positive FAST (ie, no false-positives); sensitivity was 80%; specificity, 100%; predictive value positive, 100%; predictive value negative, 96%. None of the 132 patients followed up clinically without CT or surgery (mean ISS, 4.5) had fluid documented by FAST, and all did well.

Conclusions: The focused assessment for the sonographic evaluation of pediatric blunt trauma patients performed by surgical residents and attendings in the ED rapidly and accurately predicted the presence or absence of intraperitoneal fluid. The FAST is a potentially valuable tool to rapidly prioritize the need for laparotomy in the child with multiple injuries and extraabdominal sources of bleeding.

References (37)

  • D Rossi et al.

    Management of intra-abdominal organ injury following blunt abdominal trauma in children

    Int Care Med

    (1993)
  • CJ Sivit et al.

    Commentary: Sonography in the evaluation of children following blunt trauma: Is it to be or not to be?

    Pediatr Radiol

    (1995)
  • S Rothenberg et al.

    Selective management of blunt abdominal trauma in children—The triage role of peritoneal lavage

    J Trauma

    (1987)
  • RW Powell et al.

    Peritoneal lavage in pediatric patients sustaining blunt abdominal trauma: A reappraisal

    J Trauma

    (1987)
  • R Grüessner et al.

    Sonography versus peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma

    J Trauma

    (1989)
  • M Aufshnaiter et al.

    Sonographic acute diagnosis in polytrauma

    Aktuel Traumatol

    (1993)
  • JA Chambers et al.

    Ultrasound in abdominal trauma: An alternative to peritoneal lavage

    Arch Emer Med

    (1988)
  • HJ Halbfass et al.

    Ultrasonic diagnosis of blunt abdominal injuries

    Fortschr Med

    (1981)
  • Cited by (78)

    • Anesthesia for the Pediatric Trauma Patient

      2016, Smith's Anesthesia for Infants and Children, Ninth Edition
    • Anesthesia for the Pediatric Trauma Patient

      2011, Smith's Anesthesia for Infants and Children: Expert Consult Premium Edition - Enhanced Online Features and Print
    • Eight Secrets to Implementing Bedside Ultrasonography in Pediatric Emergency Medicine

      2011, Clinical Pediatric Emergency Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      During the past decade, bedside US has emerged as an important tool for PEM physicians in various settings: rapid assessment of trauma patients,1-20 foreign body removal,21-26 central line placement,27-38 regional nerve block placement,39,40 evaluation of intravascular volume status,41,42 bladder evaluation before catheterization,43-48 assessment of difficult peripheral intravenous access,49-53 and assessment of cardiac function during resuscitations.54-56

    • Extending the Focused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma Examination in Children

      2011, Clinical Pediatric Emergency Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Their abdominal cavities are small and typically are not obscured by fat or morbid obesity such as in adults. The role of the FAST examination in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma has been conflated by the issues of identifying any and all IAI to guide nonoperative management vs identifying those children that need exploratory laparotomy for their injuries.4,9,12-14,31,32 The FAST examination has been used in pediatric trauma patients to rapidly and accurately identify free intraperitoneal fluid, assist in the triage of patients based on hemodynamic stability, and determine the need for laparotomy.4,9,31

    • Anesthesia for the Pediatric Trauma Patient

      2011, Smith's Anesthesia for Infants and Children
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Presented at the 28 Annual Meeting of the American Pediatric Surgical Association, Naples, Florida, May 18–21, 1997.

    View full text