Clinical studyDocumentation of discussions about prognosis with terminally ill patients☆
Section snippets
Study design and sampling
We performed a cross-sectional study using data collected retrospectively from medical records of eligible patients admitted to community hospitals in Connecticut during 1997. Patient eligibility criteria included being at least 65 years old at the time of admission, being admitted for at least one night to one of the six study hospitals during the study period, and having a diagnosis of brain, pancreas, liver, gall bladder, or inoperable lung cancer at the time of admission. These types of
Results
The study sample (Table 1) was representative of patients who die of cancer in the state, as listed in the statewide tumor registry, in terms of sex, race, and marital status, but was slightly older, probably because all patients were at least 65 years old. The mean (± SD) length of stay was 9 ± 8 days; 30 patients (13%) stayed for 1 or 2 days, and 36 (16%) patients stayed for 2 weeks or more. The mean (±SD) number of diagnoses per patient was 6 ± 3.
Discussion
Our findings indicate that documentation of discussions about prognosis among inpatients with terminal cancer is infrequent and limited in several ways. First, in nearly one quarter of cases with documented prognosis discussions, no physician was involved. In these cases, either a social worker or a nurse was the clinician who discussed the prognosis with the patient or family. Second, patients were often not included in such discussions despite the importance of such information for patient
Acknowledgements
The authors have benefited from the comments of Harlan Krumholz, MD, Nicholas Christakis, MD, Liana Fraenkel, MD, Sara Erickson, MD, and Christiana Williams, MPH.
References (42)
- et al.
Attitudes of hospitalized patients toward life supportA survey of 200 medical inpatients
Am J Med
(1989) - et al.
Information and decision-making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patients
Soc Sci Med
(1988) Communication and awareness about deathA study of a random sample of dying people
Soc Sci Med
(1991)- et al.
Outcomes, preferences for resuscitation, and physician-patient communication among patients with metastatic colon cancer. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses, and Preferences for Outcomes, and Risks of Treatments
Am J Med
(1998) The power of compassionTruth-telling among American doctors in the care of dying patients
Soc Sci Med
(1993)- et al.
Informationneedsinterminalillness
SocSciMed
(1999) - et al.
Howaredecisionsmadeaboutuseofpercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomyforlong-termnutritionalsupport?
AmJGastroenterol
(1999) - et al.
What is wrong with end-of-life care? Opinions of bereaved family members
J Am Geriatr Soc
(1997) - et al.
Advance directives for medical care—a case for greater use
N Engl J Med
(1991) - et al.
The discussion of end-of-life medical care by primary care patients and physiciansA multicenter study using structured qualitative interviews. The EOL Study Group
J Gen Intern Med
(1994)
The discussion about advance directives. Patient and physician opinions regarding when and how it should be conducted. End of Life Study Group
Arch Intern Med
Discussions about end-of-life care in nursing homes
J Am Geriatr Soc
Choices about cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital. When do physicians talk with patients?
N Engl J Med
How do medical residents discuss resuscitation with patients?
J Gen Intern Med
Patient attitudes to discussing life-sustaining treatment
Arch Intern Med
Discussing cardiopulmonary resuscitationA study of elderly outpatients
J Gen Intern Med
Patient preferences for communication with physicians about end-of-life decisions
Ann Intern Med
Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patientsFindings of the support project. the study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments
J Am Geriatr Soc
Life-sustaining treatment decisions for nursing home residentsWho discusses, who decides and what is decided?
J Am Geriatr Soc
Informed consent, cancer, and truth in prognosis
N Engl J Med
Information needs of patients with advanced cancer—how much do they know and does this match what they want to know?
Psycho-Oncology
Cited by (98)
Mortality Conversations Between Male Veterans and Their Providers Prior to Dysvascular Lower Extremity Amputation
2023, Annals of Vascular SurgeryHealth Information Preferences and Curability Beliefs Among Patients With Advanced Cancer
2021, Journal of Pain and Symptom ManagementPrognostication in Serious Illness
2020, Medical Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :Second, most data about patients’ actual survival are obtained from clinical trials, which typically select for otherwise healthy patients and are therefore limited in their generalizability.29 Third, the culture of modern medicine discourages frank discussions of death and dying and has, in turn, fostered professional norms that devalue prognostic estimates and favor optimism over accuracy.22,29,31 Unfortunately, even when a clinician has a clear sense of a patient’s disease trajectory, prognostic nondisclosure is exceedingly common.7,18,20,21,31
Feasibility of a team based prognosis and treatment goal discussion (T-PAT) with women diagnosed with advanced breast cancer
2019, Patient Education and CounselingCitation Excerpt :Consequently, it is important to devise tools and approaches to prognosis discussion that enable clinicians to address prognosis in ways that are suitable to their role, and acceptable to patients. Recommendations for advanced disease prognosis discussion include planning and documenting the discussion, being adaptive to the patient’s willingness to discuss, using team or family-based discussions, repetition, and discussion of patients’ preferences for aggressive care and end of life concerns [2,4,23–30]. Though some approaches rely on patient initiated methods (e.g. question prompt lists) to start a prognosis discussion [18,19,30,31], clinician-patient communication reflects an inherent power imbalance that most patients and caregivers are reluctant to challenge [32].
Language Used by Health Care Professionals to Describe Dying at an Acute Care Hospital
2018, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
- ☆
Supported by grants from the John D. Thompson Hospice Institute for Training, Education, and Research, and the Nathan Cummings Foundation.