Are faces special for sheep? Evidence from facial and object discrimination learning tests showing effects of inversion and social familiarity

doi:10.1016/0376-6357(96)00006-X

Behavioural Processes

Volume 38, Issue 1, October 1996, Pages 19-35

https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(96)00006-X Get rights and content

Abstract

We have previously shown that sheep, like monkeys, have neural circuits within the temporal lobe that respond preferentially to faces. They can also discriminate between sheep, humans and other animals on the basis of facial cues using an enclosed Y-maze. In the present study we investigated the speed with which Clun Forest sheep learn to discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar faces, as opposed to symbols, in order to gain a food reward using the same Y-maze apparatus. Animals (n = 10) received 1 day of training where projected images of the pairs of faces or symbols were paired for 20 trials with a picture of either an empty or full bucket of food (which indicated which choice of face or symbol would result in the animal receiving a food reward) and on the next 4 days they were given a further 20 trials a day with the faces or symbols alone. Results showed that sheep learned significantly faster (by day 1 or 2 post training) to recognise sheep faces of a familiar breed compared to geometrical symbols (3–4 days post training). Learning using faces of animals of another unfamiliar breed was also significantly better than for symbols but was significantly worse than that seen using faces of a familiar breed. Inverting the faces significantly reduced learning speed for faces of a familiar breed but not for that of an unfamiliar one. Inverting familiar objects, food buckets, also did not impair discriminatory performance. In a further set of trials where discrimination learning was made more difficult by excluding cued trials and reducing the number of daily trials to eight, social familiarity was found to further improve the animal's ability to learn to discriminate between the faces of a familiar breed. Finally, while discriminatory performance for adult sheep faces was very good, that for young lamb faces was poor, with only one animal learning to choose the face associated with food. It was confirmed in maternal ewes that they were also slow to learn to recognise the faces of their lambs (2–3 weeks). Overall these results show that sheep can learn to distinguish between individual adult sheep faces but that breed and social familiarity influence the level of performance. Further, discrimination learning of familiar and unfamiliar facial stimuli is better than between simple geometrical symbols, indicating that faces may be preferentially processed by the brain compared to other objects suggesting that faces are indeed special in this species as has been claimed for human and non-human primates.

References (30)

G. Alexander et al.
Importance of visual cues from various body regions in maternal recognition of the young in Merino sheep (Ovis aries)
Appl. Anim. Ethol.
(1977)
K.M. Kendrick et al.
Facial and vocal discrimination in sheep
Anim. Behav.
(1995)
E.K. Miller et al.
Suppression of visual responses of neurones in inferior temporal cortex of the awake macaque by addition of a second stimulus
Brain Res.
(1993)
W.H. Overman et al.
Hemispheric specialization displayed by man but not macaques for analysis of faces
Neuropsychologia
(1982)
D.I. Perrett et al.
Visual neurones responsive to faces
Trends Neurosci.
(1987)
D.I. Perrett et al.
Specialized face processing and hemispheric asymmetry in man and monkey: evidence from single unit and reaction time studies
Behav. Brain Res.
(1988)
G. Rhodes et al.
What's lost in inverted faces?
Cognition
(1993)
E.T. Rolls
Brain mechanisms for invariant visual recognition and learning
Behav. Processes
(1994)
S.A. Rosenfeld et al.
Face recognition in the rhesus monkey
Neuropsychologia
(1979)
E.R. Shillito-Walser
A comparison of the role of vision and hearing in ewes finding their own lambs
Appl. Anim. Ethol.
(1978)

R.K. Yin

Face recognition: a dissociable ability?

Neuropsychologica

(1970)

R. Zayan

Mental representations in the recognition of conspecific individuals

Behav. Processes

(1994)

T. Allison et al.

Face recognition in human extrastriate cortex

J. Neurophysiol.

(1994)

G.W. Arnold

Association and social behaviour

C.J. Bruce et al.

Visual properties of neurones in a polysensory area in the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque

J. Neurophysiol.

(1981)

Cited by (122)

Do toddlers reason about other people's experiences of objects? A limit to early mental state reasoning
2024, Cognition
Human social life requires an understanding of the mental states of one's social partners. Two people who look at the same objects often experience them differently, as a twinkling light or a planet, a 6 or a 9, and a random cat or Cleo, their pet. Indeed, a primary purpose of communication is to share distinctive experiences of objects or events. Here, we test whether toddlers (14–15 months) are sensitive to another agent's distinctive experiences of pictures when determining the goal underlying the agent's actions in a minimally social context. We conducted nine experiments. Across seven of these experiments (n = 206), toddlers viewed either videotaped or live events in which an actor, whose perspective differed from their own, reached (i) for pictures of human faces that were upright or inverted or (ii) for pictures that depicted a rabbit or a duck at different orientations. Then either the actor or the toddler moved to a new location that aligned their perspectives, and the actor alternately reached to each of the two pictures. By comparing toddlers' looking to the latter reaches, we tested whether their goal attributions accorded with the actor's experience of the pictured objects, with their own experience of the pictured objects, or with no consistency. In no experiment did toddlers encode the actor's goal in accord with his experiences of the pictures. In contrast, in a similar experiment that manipulated the visibility of a picture rather than the experience that it elicited, toddlers (n = 32) correctly expected the actor's action to depend on what was visible and occluded to him, rather than to themselves. In a verbal version of the tasks, older children (n = 35) correctly inferred the actor's goal in both cases. These findings provide further evidence for a dissociation between two kinds of mental state reasoning: When toddlers view an actor's object-directed action under minimally social conditions, they take account of the actor's visual access to the object but not the actor's distinctive experience of the object.
Differences between high and low performers in face recognition in electrophysiological correlates of face familiarity and distance-to-norm
2023, Biological Psychology
Valentine’s influential norm-based multidimensional face-space model (nMDFS) predicts that perceived distinctiveness of a face increases with its distance to the norm. Occipito-temporal event-related potentials (ERPs) have been recently shown to respond selectively to variations in distance-to-norm (P200) or familiarity (N250, late negativity), respectively (Wuttke & Schweinberger, 2019). Despite growing evidence on interindividual differences in face perception skills at the behavioral level, little research has focused on their electrophysiological correlates. To reveal potential interindividual differences in face spaces, we contrasted high and low performers in face recognition in regards to distance-to-norm (P200) and familiarity (N250). We replicated both the P200 distance-to-norm and the N250 familiarity effect. Importantly, we observed: i) reduced responses in low compared to high performers of face recognition, especially in terms of smaller distance-to-norm effects in the P200, possibly indicating less ‘expanded’ face spaces in low compared to high performers; ii) increased N250 responses to familiar original faces in high performers, suggesting more robust face identity representations. In summary, these findings suggest the contribution of both early norm-based face coding and robust face representations to individual face recognition skills, and indicate that ERPs can offer a promising route to understand individual differences in face perception and their neurocognitive correlates.
Social isolation of unfamiliar cattle by groups of familiar cattle
2023, Behavioural Processes
Domestic herbivores show a strong motivation to form associations with conspecifics and the social dynamics of any group is dependant on the individuals within the group. Thus, common farm management practices such mixing may cause social disruption. Social integration of new group members has previously been defined as a lack of aggressive interactions within the group. However, a lack of aggression among group members may not represent full integration into the social group. Here we observe the impact of disrupting groups of cattle via the introduction of an unfamiliar individual, on the social network patterns of six groups of cattle. Cattle contacts between all individuals in a group were recorded before and after the introduction of the unfamiliar individual. Pre-introduction, resident cattle showed preferential associations with specific individuals in the group. Post-introduction, resident cattle reduced the strength of their contacts (e.g., frequency) with each other relative to the pre-introduction phase. Unfamiliar individuals were socially isolated from the group throughout the trial. The observed social contact patterns suggest that new group members are socially isolated from established groups longer than previously thought, and common farm mixing practices may have negative welfare consequences on introduced individuals.
Study of variability of cognitive performance in captive fallow deer (Dama dama) through g and c factors
2022, Journal of Veterinary Behavior
Citation Excerpt :
Therefore, they would be more capable of discriminating the horizontal sections common to the triangle and the parallelogram, which are not present in the circle. Another study suggests that discriminant learning between familiar and non-familiar facial stimuli is better than between simple geometric symbols, which indicates that the brain processes faces preferably in comparison with other objects, as has been shown in sheep, humans and non-human primates (Kendrick et al. 1996). The cognitive performance of the animals with respect to the discrimination of symbols could be influenced by cognitive factors different from those that affect the performance in the motor task, the inhibitory control and the discrimination and inversion of color and tone, as our CATPCA suggests.
Psychometric studies reveal a variability that ranges between 30 and 75 % for different cognitive processes, both in humans and non-human animals. This variability has been ascribed to a “general intelligence” factor (g). Current studies implemented in non-human animals to identify individual differences in cognitive skills are still far from those applied in humans. We tested for cognitive performance in a fallow deer herd using a test battery of eight tasks based on measures for cognitive development in untamed confined wild animals: motor control, spatial memory, colour and tone discrimination and inversion, inhibitory control and symbol discrimination tests. g factor explained 60 % of the variability in cognitive performance. Significant correlations, both positive and negative, were found between the different cognitive processes studied. Likewise, the cognitive performance of the group was affected by a “collective intelligence” factor (c), inferred through variables describing the hierarchical structure of the studied population but which, however does not affect individual intelligence quotient of the members of the group.
Lambs identify their mothers’ bleats but not a picture of her face
2021, Journal of Veterinary Behavior
Ewes and lambs develop a strong and selective bond immediately after birth that is maintained throughout the suckling period. The strength and maintenance of this bond are partially dependent on the different sensory signals. However, there is little information about selectivity and clues involved in this bond related to later periods. The aim of this study was to determine the importance of visual and auditory stimuli on the lambs' preference toward their mother or a familiar ewe at the age of 3 months. Twenty-four Corriedale ewes and their single lambs were used in 3 tests on 3 consecutive days. The lambs remained continuously with their mothers apart from the period of the preference test. The 2-choice tests were performed in a triangular testing pen (6.0 m x 6.0 m x 4.4 m), with one stimulus placed in each of 2 small sheds (2.0 m x 1.35 m). The lambs remained 3 minutes into the test area without any interference. In Test 1, the preference of lambs toward a picture of their mothers' face or toward a familiar ewes' face (visual signal) was evaluated. In Test 2, the preference of the lambs for their mothers' or a familiar ewes' bleats (auditory signal) was evaluated. In Test 3, visual and auditory signals (but no physical contact) were permitted, evaluating the preference for the mother or a familiar ewe. The lambs did not display any preference for their mothers' picture (Test 1). In Tests 2 and 3, lambs entered their mothers' proximity zone earlier, remained for longer, and emitted more bleats than they did in the proximity zone of a familiar ewe. In Test 2, lambs also entered more times to their mothers' proximity zone. We concluded that 3-months old lambs display a strong preference for their mother, if only auditory or visual and auditive communication are allowed. Contrastingly, they held no preference toward pictures of their mothers' faces to that of pictures of the face of a familiar ewe, suggesting perhaps that at that age, lambs are unable to recognize pictures of faces as adult sheep are able to do.
Parting self from others: Individual and self-recognition in birds
2020, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
Citation Excerpt :
The importance of the head area has also been found in birds spontaneous behaviour: pigeons (Columba livia) show more courtship behaviour to a video of a female pigeon’s 'face' as opposed to its body (Shimizu, 1998), and can learn to discriminate the pictures of conspecifics’ faces (Watanabe and Ito, 1990). However, there is also evidence that the configuration of the features is less important for birds than for mammals: in contrast to humans (Carey and Diamond, 1977; Diamond and Carey, 1986), sheep (Ovis aries) (Kendrick et al., 1996) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes; Dahl et al., 2013), carrion crows do not show a face inversion effect, that is, they recognise upright and inverted faces just as easily. This result indicates that they do not seem to process conspecifics’ profile faces in a specialised, holistic manner (Brecht et al., 2017); (see Fig. 3C).
Individual recognition is the ability to differentiate between conspecifics based on their individual features. It forms the basis of many complex communicative and social behaviours. Here, we review studies investigating individual recognition in the auditory and visual domain in birds. It is well established that auditory signals are used by many birds to discriminate conspecifics. In songbirds, the neuronal structures underpinning auditory recognition are associated with the song system. Individual recognition in the visual domain has mainly been explored in chickens and pigeons, and is less well understood. Currently it is unknown which visual cues birds use to identify conspecifics, and whether they have cortical areas dedicated to processing individual features. Moreover, whether birds can recognise themselves visually, as evidenced by mirror self-recognition, remains controversial. In the auditory domain, the responses of neurons in the song system suggest identification of the bird’s own song. The surveyed behavioural and neural findings can provide a framework for more controlled investigations of individual recognition in birds and other species.

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text

Article preview

Behavioural Processes

Abstract

References (30)

Importance of visual cues from various body regions in maternal recognition of the young in Merino sheep (Ovis aries)

Appl. Anim. Ethol.

Facial and vocal discrimination in sheep

Anim. Behav.

Suppression of visual responses of neurones in inferior temporal cortex of the awake macaque by addition of a second stimulus

Brain Res.

Hemispheric specialization displayed by man but not macaques for analysis of faces

Neuropsychologia

Visual neurones responsive to faces

Trends Neurosci.

Specialized face processing and hemispheric asymmetry in man and monkey: evidence from single unit and reaction time studies

Behav. Brain Res.

What's lost in inverted faces?

Cognition

Brain mechanisms for invariant visual recognition and learning

Behav. Processes

Face recognition in the rhesus monkey

Neuropsychologia

A comparison of the role of vision and hearing in ewes finding their own lambs

Appl. Anim. Ethol.

Face recognition: a dissociable ability?

Neuropsychologica

Mental representations in the recognition of conspecific individuals

Behav. Processes

Face recognition in human extrastriate cortex

J. Neurophysiol.

Association and social behaviour

Visual properties of neurones in a polysensory area in the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque

J. Neurophysiol.

Cited by (122)

Do toddlers reason about other people's experiences of objects? A limit to early mental state reasoning

Differences between high and low performers in face recognition in electrophysiological correlates of face familiarity and distance-to-norm

Social isolation of unfamiliar cattle by groups of familiar cattle

Study of variability of cognitive performance in captive fallow deer (Dama dama) through g and c factors

Lambs identify their mothers’ bleats but not a picture of her face

Parting self from others: Individual and self-recognition in birds

Research paperAre faces special for sheep? Evidence from facial and object discrimination learning tests showing effects of inversion and social familiarity

Abstract

Appl. Anim. Ethol.

Anim. Behav.

Brain Res.

Neuropsychologia

Trends Neurosci.

Behav. Brain Res.

Cognition

Behav. Processes

Neuropsychologia

Appl. Anim. Ethol.

Neuropsychologica

Behav. Processes

Face recognition in human extrastriate cortex

J. Neurophysiol.

Association and social behaviour

Visual properties of neurones in a polysensory area in the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque

J. Neurophysiol.

Research paper
Are faces special for sheep? Evidence from facial and object discrimination learning tests showing effects of inversion and social familiarity