Main article
Reliability of transcranial magnetic stimulation for mapping the human motor cortex

https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(94)90076-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Motor mapping using transcranial magnetic stimulation has been applied to the study of adaptive and restorative mechanisms of the motor cortex. To date, the reproducibility of mapping techniques has yet to be investigated in detail and/or confirmed. We report a technique used to map the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) motor cortices of 6 normal volunteers, each studied on 2 occasions separated by several weeks (range of 21–132 days). APB and ADM results were analyzed separately, with area and volume characteristics subjected to analysis of variance. Coefficients of variation, which should be low, ranged from 14% to 37% and coefficients of reliability, which should be high, ranged from 63% to 94%, indicating that the described technique for motor mapping in reproducible.

References (34)

  • J.G. Cohen et al.

    Methodology for non-invasive mapping of human cortex with electrical stimulation

    Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1988)
  • L.G. Cohen et al.

    Motor reorganization after upper limb amputation in man: a study with focal magnetic stimulation

    Brain

    (1991)
  • A. Eisen

    Cortical and peripheral nerve magnetic stimulation

    Meth. Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1992)
  • A. Eisen et al.

    Cortical excitability in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a clue to pathogenesis

    Can. J. Neurol. Sci.

    (1993)
  • J.L. Fleiss

    The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments

  • C.W. Hess et al.

    Responses in small hand muscles from magnetic stimulation of the human brain

    J. Physiol. (Lond.)

    (1987)
  • A. Hufnagel et al.

    Magnetic stimulation motor-evoked potentials in epilepsy: effects of the disease and anticonvulsant medications

    Ann. Neurol.

    (1990)
  • Cited by (123)

    • TMS brain mapping in less than two minutes

      2015, Brain Stimulation
      Citation Excerpt :

      We confirmed for the pseudorandom walk method that also area is a reliable measure but this does not hold for volume. The difference in reliability of the map volume between the methods is in line with the equivocal reports earlier [13,21] and is unlikely to be a consequence of the method. Therefore, we recommend focusing on COG and area when analysing TMS maps.

    • Projecting navigated TMS sites on the gyral anatomy decreases inter-subject variability of cortical motor maps

      2015, Brain Stimulation
      Citation Excerpt :

      A further advantage is that they can be combined with other imagine methods such as fMRI and EEG/MEG which can both be normalized into the same coordinate space as the TMS data [32]. These two methods are therefore superior to traditional approaches using scalp landmarks such as the 10-20 positioning relative to the vertex [2,3,5]. Both approaches resulted in group cortical maps situated over the M1 hand region and therefore tallied well with direct cortical stimulation (DCS) during surgery, where the ‘hotspot’ of the DCS and the TMS were situated on the same gyrus (M1) for individual maps [33,34].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported in part by MRC Program Grant PG-11127.

    View full text