Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stages of sarcopenia, bone mineral density, and the prevalence of osteoporosis in older women

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Osteoporosis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

A better understanding of the relationship between osteoporosis and sarcopenia may help to develop effective preventive and therapeutic strategies. In the present study, the association between different stages of sarcopenia, BMD, and osteoporosis was examined. The salient findings indicate that a dose–response relationship exists between sarcopenia stages and bone-related phenotypes.

Purpose

To assess the association between sarcopenia stages, bone mineral density (BMD), and the prevalence of osteoporosis in older women.

Methods

Two hundred thirty-four women (68.3 ± 6.3 years) underwent body composition and BMD measurements using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Quadriceps isokinetic torque was evaluated, and the timed up-and-go test was conducted as a measure of function. Sarcopenia stages were classified according to European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP): nonsarcopenia, presarcopenia, sarcopenia, and severe sarcopenia. Osteoporosis was defined as BMD value (hip or spine) 2.5 standard deviations below a young-adult reference population. Between-group differences were examined using ANOVA for continuous variables and chi-squared for categorical variables. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association between sarcopenia stages and osteoporosis.

Results

Rates of osteoporosis were 15.8%, 19.2%, 35.3%, and 46.2% for nonsarcopenia, presarcopenia, sarcopenia, and severe sarcopenia, respectively (P = 0.002). Whole-body and femoral neck BMD values were significantly lower among all sarcopenia stages when compared to nonsarcopenia (all P values < 0.05, η2p 0.113 to 0.109). The severe sarcopenia group also showed significantly lower lumbar spine BMD values and T-scores (both P values < 0.05; η2p 0.035 and 0.037, respectively). When clustered, sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia exhibited lower BMD values for all sites (all P values < 0.01), and presented a significantly higher risk for osteoporosis (odds ratio 3.445; 95% CI 1.521–7.844).

Conclusion

The observed results provide support for the concept that a dose–response relationship exists between sarcopenia stages, BMD, and the presence of osteoporosis. These findings strengthen the clinical significance of the EWGSOP sarcopenia definition and indicate that severe sarcopenia should be viewed with attention by healthcare professionals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siris E, Adler R, Bilezikian J, Bolognese M, Dawson-Hughes B, Favus M, Harris S, De Beur SJ, Khosla S, Lane N (2014) The clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis: a position statement from the National Bone Health Alliance Working Group. Osteoporos Int 25(5):1439–1443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hopkins R, Burke N, Von Keyserlingk C, Leslie W, Morin S, Adachi J, Papaioannou A, Bessette L, Brown J, Pericleous L (2016) The current economic burden of illness of osteoporosis in Canada. Osteoporos Int 27(10):3023–3032

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wright NC, Looker AC, Saag KG, Curtis JR, Delzell ES, Randall S, Dawson-Hughes B (2014) The recent prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mass in the United States based on bone mineral density at the femoral neck or lumbar spine. J Bone Miner Res 29(11):2520–2526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cosman F, Krege J, Looker A, Schousboe J, Fan B, Isfahani NS, Shepherd J, Krohn K, Steiger P, Wilson K (2017) Spine fracture prevalence in a nationally representative sample of US women and men aged≥ 40 years: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013-2014. Osteoporos Int 28(6):1857–1866

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wright N, Saag K, Dawson-Hughes B, Khosla S, Siris E (2017) The impact of the new National Bone Health Alliance (NBHA) diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of osteoporosis in the USA. Osteoporos Int 28(4):1225–1232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. J-p Z, H-x M, S-w Z, W-l L, C-q C, H-b Z, Li S-f, Y-p F, Sun C-h (2018) Risk factors for osteoporosis in liver cirrhosis patients measured by transient elastography. Medicine 97(20):e10645. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000010645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Drey M, Sieber CC, Bertsch T, Bauer JM, Schmidmaier R (2016) Osteosarcopenia is more than sarcopenia and osteopenia alone. Aging Clin Exp Res 28(5):895–899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, Martin FC, Michel JP, Rolland Y, Schneider SM, Topinkova E, Vandewoude M, Zamboni M (2010) Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: report of the European working group on sarcopenia in older people. Age Ageing 39(4):412–423. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afq034

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosenberg IH (1989) Epidemiologic and methodologic problems in determining nutritional status of older persons. Proceedings of a conference. Albuquerque, New Mexico, October 19-21, 1988. Am J Clin Nutr 50(5 Suppl):1121–1235

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lima RM, Bezerra LM, Rabelo HT, Silva MA, Silva AJ, Bottaro M, de Oliveira RJ (2009) Fat-free mass, strength, and sarcopenia are related to bone mineral density in older women. J Clin Densitom 12(1):35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2008.10.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee D-W, Choi E-Y (2016) Sarcopenia as an independent risk factor for decreased BMD in COPD patients: Korean national health and nutrition examination surveys iv and V (2008-2011). PLoS One 11(10):e0164303

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Huo YR, Suriyaarachchi P, Gomez F, Curcio CL, Boersma D, Muir SW, Montero-Odasso M, Gunawardene P, Demontiero O, Duque G (2015) Phenotype of osteosarcopenia in older individuals with a history of falling. J Am Med Dir Assoc 16(4):290–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yoshimura N, Muraki S, Oka H, Iidaka T, Kodama R, Horii C, Kawaguchi H, Nakamura K, Akune T, Tanaka S (2018) Do sarcopenia and/or osteoporosis increase the risk of frailty? A 4-year observation of the second and third ROAD study surveys. Osteoporos Int:1–10

  14. Bertolucci PH, Brucki S, Campacci SR, Juliano Y (1994) O mini-exame do estado mental em uma populaçäo geral: impacto da escolaridade. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 52(1):1–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shelkey M, Wallace M (1999) Katz index of independence in activities of daily living. J Gerontol Nurs 25(3):8–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gadelha AB, Paiva FML, Gauche R, de Oliveira RJ, Lima RM (2016) Effects of resistance training on sarcopenic obesity index in older women: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 65:168–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Heymsfield SB, Smith R, Aulet M, Bensen B, Lichtman S, Wang J, Pierson R Jr (1990) Appendicular skeletal muscle mass: measurement by dual-photon absorptiometry. Am J Clin Nutr 52(2):214–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gadelha AB, Neri SGR, RJd O, Bottaro M, ACd D, Vainshelboim B, Lima RM (2018) Severity of sarcopenia is associated with postural balance and risk of falls in community-dwelling older women. Exp Aging Res 44:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073x.2018.1449591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. World Health Organization (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: report of a WHO study group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 843:1–129.

  20. Bottaro M, Russo A, Oliveira R (2005) The effects of rest interval on quadriceps torque during an isokinetic testing protocol in elderly. J Sports Sci Med 4(3):285–290

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Pereira J, Neri S, Vainshelboim B, Gadelha A, Bottaro M, Oliveira R, Lima R (2019) Normative values of knee extensor isokinetic strength for older women and implications on physical function. J Geriatr Phys Ther. https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000198

  22. Mathias S, Nayak U, Isaacs B (1986) Balance in elderly patients: the “get-up and go” test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 67(6):387–389

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vacha-Haase T, Thompson B (2004) How to estimate and interpret various effect sizes. J Couns Psychol 51(4):473–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Binkley N, Buehring B (2009) Beyond FRAX®: It’s time to consider “sarco-osteopenia”. J Clin Densitom 12(4):413–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Paintin J, Cooper C, Dennison E (2018) Osteosarcopenia. Br J Hosp Med 79(5):253–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gentil P, Lima RM, Jaco de Oliveira R, Pereira RW, Reis VM (2007) Association between femoral neck bone mineral density and lower limb fat-free mass in postmenopausal women. J Clin Densitom 10(2):174–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2007.01.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Walsh MC, Hunter GR, Livingstone MB (2006) Sarcopenia in premenopausal and postmenopausal women with osteopenia, osteoporosis and normal bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int 17(1):61–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Liang MT, Bassin S, Dutto D, Braun W, Wong N, Pontello AM, Cooper DM, Arnaud SB (2007) Bone mineral density and leg muscle strength in young Caucasian, Hispanic, and Asian women. J Clin Densitom 10(2):157–164

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Di Monaco M, Castiglioni C, Di Monaco R, Tappero R (2017) Association between low lean mass and low bone mineral density in 653 women with hip fracture: does the definition of low lean mass matter? Aging Clin Exp Res 29(6):1271–1276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gadelha AB, Vainshelboim B, Ferreira AP, Neri SGR, Bottaro M, Lima RM (2018) Stages of sarcopenia and the incidence of falls in older women: a prospective study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 79:151–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kritz-Silverstein D, Barrett-Connor E (1994) Grip strength and bone mineral density in older women. J Bone Miner Res 9(1):45–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dixon W, Lunt M, Pye S, Reeve J, Felsenberg D, Silman A, O'neill T (2005) Low grip strength is associated with bone mineral density and vertebral fracture in women. Rheumatology 44(5):642–646

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Picca A, Calvani R, Manes-Gravina E, Spaziani L, Landi F, Bernabei R, Marzetti E (2017) Bone-muscle crosstalk: unraveling new therapeutic targets for osteoporosis. Curr Pharm Des 23(41):6256–6263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Morat T, Gilmore KJ, Rice CL (2016) Neuromuscular function in different stages of sarcopenia. Exp Gerontol 81:28–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Huang D-D, Zhou C-J, Wang S-L, Mao S-T, Zhou X-Y, Lou N, Zhang Z, Yu Z, Shen X, Zhuang C-L (2017) Impact of different sarcopenia stages on the postoperative outcomes after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surgery 161(3):680–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyère O, Cederholm T, Cooper C, Landi F, Rolland Y, Sayer AA (2019) Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 1;48(1):16–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afy169

  37. Radominski SC, Bernardo W, APd P, Albergaria B-H, Moreira C, Fernandes CE, Castro CH, Zerbini CAF, Domiciano DS, Mendonça L (2017) Brazilian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Rev Bras Reumatol 57:s452–s466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cosman F, De Beur S, LeBoff M, Lewiecki E, Tanner B, Randall S, Lindsay R (2014) Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 25(10):2359–2381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors would like to thank the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) grant no. 307203/2016-6.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Physical Education, University of Brasília, Asa Norte, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, 70910-900, Brazil

    Ricardo M. Lima, Ricardo Jacó de Oliveira, Rafael Raposo, Silvia Gonçalves Ricci Neri & André Bonadias Gadelha

  2. Mauá Institute of Research and Education, Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil

    André Bonadias Gadelha

Authors
  1. Ricardo M. Lima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ricardo Jacó de Oliveira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rafael Raposo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Silvia Gonçalves Ricci Neri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. André Bonadias Gadelha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo M. Lima.

Ethics declarations

All participants were informed about the study procedures and voluntarily signed an informed consent form. All experiments on human subjects were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the study protocol was previously approved by the University of Brasilia Review Board, under protocol no. 1,223,636/2015.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lima, R.M., de Oliveira, R.J., Raposo, R. et al. Stages of sarcopenia, bone mineral density, and the prevalence of osteoporosis in older women. Arch Osteoporos 14, 38 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-019-0591-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-019-0591-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation