Skip to main content
Log in

Do Physician Organizations Located in Lower Socioeconomic Status Areas Score Lower on Pay-for-Performance Measures?

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Physician organizations (POs)—independent practice associations and medical groups—located in lower socioeconomic status (SES) areas may score poorly in pay-for-performance (P4P) programs.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between PO location and P4P performance.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Integrated Healthcare Association’s (IHA’s) P4P Program, the largest non-governmental, multi-payer program for POs in the U.S.

PARTICIPANTS

160 POs participating in 2009.

MAIN MEASURES

We measured PO SES using established methods that involved geo-coding 11,718 practice sites within 160 POs to their respective census tracts and weighting tract-specific SES according to the number of primary care physicians at each site. P4P performance was defined by IHA’s program and was a composite mainly representing clinical quality, but also including measures of patient experience, information technology and registry use.

KEY RESULTS

The area-based PO SES measure ranged from −11 to +11 (mean 0, SD 5), and the IHA P4P performance score ranged from 23 to 86 (mean 69, SD 15). In bivariate analysis, there was a significant positive relationship between PO SES and P4P performance (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, a one standard deviation increase in PO SES was associated with a 44% increase (relative risk 1.44, 95%CI, 1.22-1.71) in the likelihood of a PO being ranked in the top two quintiles of performance (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Physician organizations’ performance scores in a major P4P program vary by the SES of the areas in which their practice sites are located. P4P programs that do not account for this are likely to pay higher bonuses to POs in higher SES areas, thus increasing the resource gap between these POs and POs in lower SES areas, which may increase disparities in the care they provide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1.
Figure 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. H.R. 3590 --111th Congress. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. United States of America; 2009.

  2. Shortell SM, Casalino LP. Health care reform requires accountable care systems. JAMA. 2008;300(1):95–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosenthal MB, Landon BE, Normand SL, Frank RG, Epstein AM. Pay for performance in commercial HMOs. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(18):1895–1902.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chernew ME, Mechanic RE, Landon BE, Safran DG. Private-payer innovation in Massachusetts: the ‘Alternative Quality Contract’. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(1):51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chien AT, Chin MH, Davis AM, Casalino LP. Pay for performance, public reporting, and racial disparities in health care: how are programs being designed? Med Care Res Rev. 2007;64(5 Suppl):283S–304S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Franks P, Fiscella K. Effect of patient socioeconomic status on physician profiles for prevention, disease management, and diagnostic testing costs. Med Care. 2002;40(8):717–724.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Reschovsky JD, O’Malley AS. Do primary care physicians treating minority patients report problems delivering high-quality care? Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(3):w222–w231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Subramanian SV, Chen JT, Rehkopf DH, Waterman PD, Krieger N. Comparing individual- and area-based socioeconomic measures for the surveillance of health disparities: A multilevel analysis of Massachusetts births, 1989–1991. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;164(9):823–834.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Blustein J, Borden WB, Valentine M. Hospital performance, the local economy, and the local workforce: findings from a US National Longitudinal Study. PLoS Med. 2010;7(6):e1000297. PMCID: PMC2893955.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bach PB, Pham HH, Schrag D, Tate RC, Hargraves JL. Primary care physicians who treat blacks and whites. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(6):575–584.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosenblatt RA, Andrilla CHA, Curtin T, Hart LG. Shortages of medical personnel at community health centers: implications for planned expansion. JAMA. 2006;295(9):1042–1049.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. National Healthcare Disparities Report, 2010. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. National Healthcare Disparities Report, 2003. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hong CS, Atlas SJ, Chang Y, et al. Relationship between patient panel characteristics and primary care physician clinical performance rankings. JAMA. 2010;304(10):1107–1113.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Franks P, Fiscella K, Beckett L, Zwanziger J, Mooney C, Gorthy S. Effects of patient and physician practice socioeconomic status on the health care of privately insured managed care patients. Med Care. 2003;41(7):842–852.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mehta RH, Liang L, Karve AM, et al. Association of patient case-mix adjustment, hospital process performance rankings, and eligibility for financial incentives. JAMA. 2008;300(16):1897–1903.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Young G, Meterko M, White B, et al. Pay-for-performance in safety net settings: issues, opportunities, and challenges for the future. J Healthc Manag. 2010;55(2):132–141. discussion 141–132.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pham HH, Schrag D, Hargraves JL, Bach PB. Delivery of preventive services to older adults by primary care physicians. JAMA. 2005;294(4):473–481.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. The Leapfrog Group. The Leapfrog Group fact sheet. http://www.leapfroggroup.org/leapfrog-factsheet. Accessed November 16, 2011.

  20. Center for Health Care Strategies, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Descriptions of selected performance incentives programs. http://www.chcs.org/usr_doc/State_Performance_Incentive_Chart_0206.pdf. Accessed November 16, 2011.

  21. Integrated Healthcare Association. The California Pay for Performance Program. http://www.iha.org/p4p_california.html. Accessed November 16, 2011.

  22. Andreae MC, Blad K, Cabana MD. Physician compensation programs in academic medical centers. Health Care Manage Rev. 2006;31(3):251–258.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ayanian JZ, Weissman JS. Teaching hospitals and quality of care: a review of the literature. Milbank Q. 2002;80(3):569–593. v.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Rehkopf DH, Subramanian SV. Painting a truer picture of US socioeconomic and racial/ethnic health inequalities: the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(2):312–323. PMCID: PMC1449172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Rehkopf DH, Subramanian SV. Race/ethnicity, gender, and monitoring socioeconomic gradients in health: a comparison of area-based socioeconomic measures--the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(10):1655–1671. PMCID: PMC1448030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Erickson SE, Iribarren C, Tolstykh IV, Blanc PD, Eisner MD. Effect of race on asthma management and outcomes in a large, integrated managed care organization. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(17):1846–1852.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Coberley CR, Puckrein GA, Dobbs AC, McGinnis MA, Coberley SS, Shurney DW. Effectiveness of disease management programs on improving diabetes care for individuals in health-disparate areas. Dis Manag. 2007;10(3):147–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pollack LA, Gotway CA, Bates JH, et al. Use of the spatial scan statistic to identify geographic variations in late stage colorectal cancer in California (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2006;17(4):449–457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Information Technology Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology. Federal Information Processing Standards publications. http://www.itl.nist.gov/fipspubs/. Accessed November 16, 2011.

  30. Integrated Healthcare Association. The California Pay for Performance Program financial transparency. http://www.iha.org/financial_transparency.html. Accessed November 16, 2011.

  31. Mehrotra A, Epstein AM, Rosenthal MB. Do integrated medical groups provide higher-quality medical care than individual practice associations? Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(11):826–833.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cunningham PJ, Hadley J. Effects of changes in incomes and practice circumstances on physicians’ decisions to treat charity and Medicaid patients. Milbank Q. 2008;86(1):91–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cuzick J. A Wilcoxon-type test for trend. Stat Med. 1985;4(1):87–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zou G. A modified Poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(7):702–706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wilcoxon F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics. 1945;1:80–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Openshaw S, Taylor PJ. The modifiable areal unit problem. In: Wrigley N, Bennet RJ, eds. Quantiative geography: a British view. London: Routledge and Regan Paul; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Flowerdew R, Manley DJ, Sabel CE. Neighbourhood effects on health: does it matter where you draw the boundaries? Soc Sci Med. 2008;66(6):1241–1255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Billi JE, Pai CW, Spahlinger DA. The effect of distance to primary care physician on health care utilization and disease burden. Health Care Manage Rev. 2007;32(1):22–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Brooks CH. Associations among distance, patient satisfaction, and utilization of two types of inner-city clinics. Med Care. 1973;11(5):373–383.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Dudley RA, Frolich A, Robinowitz DL, et al. Strategies to support quality-based purchasing: a review of the evidence. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2004:04–0057.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Friedberg MW, Safran DG, Coltin K, Dresser M, Schneider EC. Paying for performance in primary care: potential impact on practices and disparities. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(5):926–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Karve AM, Ou FS, Lytle BL, Peterson ED. Potential unintended financial consequences of pay-for-performance on the quality of care for minority patients. Am Heart J. 2008;155(3):571–576.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Petersen LA, Woodard LD, Urech T, Daw C, Sookanan S. Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care? Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(4):265–272.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Rosenthal MB, Frank RG, Li Z, Epstein AM. Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice. JAMA. 2005;294(14):1788–1793.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Werner RM, Goldman LE, Dudley RA. Comparison of change in quality of care between safety-net and non-safety-net hospitals. JAMA. 2008;299(18):2180–2187.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Casalino LP, Devers KJ, Lake TK, Reed M, Stoddard JJ. Benefits of and barriers to large medical group practice in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(16):1958–1964.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Shortell SM, Casalino LP. Implementing qualifications criteria and technical assistance for accountable care organizations. JAMA. 2010;303(17):1747–1748.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Hing E, Burt CW. Office-based medical practices: methods and estimates from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Adv Data. 2007;383:1–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Chien AT, Li Z, Rosenthal MB. Improving timely childhood immunizations through pay for performance in Medicaid-managed care. Health Serv Res. 2010;45(6 Pt 2):1934–1947.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Chien AT, Eastman D, Li Z, Rosenthal MB. Impact of a pay for performance program to improve diabetes care in the safety net. Preventive Medicine, forthcoming.

  51. Mehrotra A, Sorbero ME, Damberg CL. Using the lessons of behavioral economics to design more effective pay-for-performance programs. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16(7):497–503.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hayward RA. All-or-nothing treatment targets make bad performance measures. Am J Manag Care. 2007;13(3):126–128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Talia Walker and Caitlin Rideout for their assistance.

Funding

This project was supported by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Prior presentations

The National Pay for Performance Summit, March 24, 2011; AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting, June 12, 2011

Conflicts of Interest

Dr. Chien does not have any conflicts of interest.

Ms. Wroblewski does not have any conflicts of interest.

Dr. Damberg does not have any conflicts of interest.

Dr. Williams does not have any conflicts of interest. His employer, Integrated Healthcare Association, a non-profit, has the following conflicts of interest: Consultancies: Keenan Advisory Board; Grants received: Sanofi-Aventis, 11/2008.

Ms. Yanagihara does not have any conflicts of interest. Her employer, Integrated Healthcare Association, a non-profit, has the following conflicts of interest: Consultancies: Keenan Advisory Board; Grants received: Sanofi-Aventis, 11/2008.

Ms. Yakunina does not have any conflicts of interest. Her former employer, Integrated Healthcare Association, a non-profit, has the following conflicts of interest: Consultancies: Keenan Advisory Board; Grants received: Sanofi-Aventis, 11/2008.

Dr. Casalino does not have any conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alyna T. Chien MD, MS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chien, A.T., Wroblewski, K., Damberg, C. et al. Do Physician Organizations Located in Lower Socioeconomic Status Areas Score Lower on Pay-for-Performance Measures?. J GEN INTERN MED 27, 548–554 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1946-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1946-8

KEY WORDS

Navigation