Abstract
Purpose
The present paper assessed the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures by comparing single-item measures to the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)—a more psychometrically established measure.
Methods
Two large samples from Washington (N = 13,064) and Oregon (N = 2,277) recruited by the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and a representative German sample (N = 1,312) recruited by the Germany Socio-Economic Panel were included in the present analyses. Single-item life satisfaction measures and the SWLS were correlated with theoretically relevant variables, such as demographics, subjective health, domain satisfaction, and affect. The correlations between the two life satisfaction measures and these variables were examined to assess the construct validity of single-item life satisfaction measures.
Results
Consistent across three samples, single-item life satisfaction measures demonstrated substantial degree of criterion validity with the SWLS (zero-order r = 0.62–0.64; disattenuated r = 0.78–0.80). Patterns of statistical significance for correlations with theoretically relevant variables were the same across single-item measures and the SWLS. Single-item measures did not produce systematically different correlations compared to the SWLS (average difference = 0.001–0.005). The average absolute difference in the magnitudes of the correlations produced by single-item measures and the SWLS was very small (average absolute difference = 0.015–0.042).
Conclusions
Single-item life satisfaction measures performed very similarly compared to the multiple-item SWLS. Social scientists would get virtually identical answer to substantive questions regardless of which measure they use.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A previous study used the same dataset as Study 1 in the current paper, but comparing single-item and multiple-item measures was not the focus [18]. The goal of this previous study was to provide baseline estimates of mental, social, and physical well-being for states overall and for different subgroups (e.g., racial groups and age groups, etc).
The SWLS was included in the New Hampshire BRFSS. However, there is difficulty obtaining the data due to recent personnel change at the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services.
The item “If I could live my life over, I would change almost nothing” is not included in BRFSS. BRFSS tested the 4 item versus the 5 item versions of SWLS and found no difference.
No other variables were analyzed but not reported.
No other variables were analyzed but not reported.
Disattenuated correlation is calculated using in-sample reliability estimate was used for the SWLS. The reliability estimate for the GSOEP (0.74) from Lucas and Donnellan was used for the single-item measure [12].
References
Diener, E., & Chan, M. Y. (2011). Happy people live longer: Subjective well‐being contributes to health and longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 3(1), 1–43.
Howell, R. T., & Howell, C. J. (2008). The relation of economic status to subjective well-being in developing countries: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 536–560.
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855.
Diener, E., Lucas, R., Schimmack, U., & Helliwell, J. (2009). Well-being for public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wagner, G. G., Joachim, R. F., & Jürgen, S. (2007). The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP)–scope, evolution and enhancements. Schmollers Jahrbuch: Journal of Applied Social Science Studies, 127(1), 139–169.
Taylor, M. F., Brice, J., Buck, N., & Prentice-Lane, E. (2009). British Household Panel Survey user manual volume A: Introduction, technical report, and appendices. Colchester: University of Essex. http://iserwww.essex.ac.uk/ulsc/bhps/doc/.
Voorpostel, M., Tillmann, R., Lebert, F., Kuhn, U., Lipps, O., Ryser, V.-A., et al. (2012). Swiss Household Panel Userguide (1999–2011), Wave 13, October 2012. Lausanne: FORS.
“Gallup Daily: U.S. Life Evaluation.” (2013). Retrieved November 11, 2013 from http://www.gallup.com/poll/110125/gallup-daily-life-evaluation.aspx.
“Gallup World Poll Knowledge Center.” (2013). Retrieved November 11, 2013 from http://www.gallup.com/strategicconsulting/en-us/worldpoll.aspx.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2010). Behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey data. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Alwin, D. F. (2007). Margins of error: A study of reliability in survey measurement. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2012). Estimating the reliability of single-item life satisfaction measures: Results from four national panel studies. Social Indicators Research, 105(3), 323–331.
Kenny, D. A., & Zautra, A. (1995). The trait–state–error model for multi-wave data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 52–59.
Kenny, D. A., & Zautra, A. (2001). The trait–state models for longitudinal data. In L. M. Collins & A. G. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 243–263). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281.
Kobau, R., Sniezek, J., Zack, M. M., Lucas, R. E., & Burns, A. (2010). Well‐being assessment: An evaluation of well‐being scales for public health and population estimates of well‐being among US adults. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 2(3), 272–297.
Kobau, R., Bann, C., Lewis, M., Zack, M. M., Boardman, A. M., Boyd, R., et al. (2013). Mental, social, and physical well-being in New Hampshire, Oregon, and Washington, 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System: Implications for public health research and practice related to Healthy People 2020 foundation health measures on well-being. Population Health Metrics, 11(19), 1–16.
Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.
del Mar Salinas-Jiménez, M., Artés, J., & Salinas-Jiménez, J. (2011). Education as a positional good: A life satisfaction approach. Social Indicators Research, 103(3), 409–426.
Schimmack, U., & Oishi, S. (2005). The influence of chronically and temporarily accessible information on life satisfaction judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 395–406.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gerlitz, J. Y., & Schupp, J. (2005). Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten persoenlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP. DIW Research Notes, 4, 1–36.
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2, 102–138.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(4), 668–678.
DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 197–229.
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9(1), 1–28.
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., Oishi, S., et al. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a Graduate Research Fellowship from the National Science Foundation awarded to the first author and by funding from the National Institute on Aging (AG040715) awarded to the second author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cheung, F., Lucas, R.E. Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: results from three large samples. Qual Life Res 23, 2809–2818 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0726-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0726-4