Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of catheter movement and contact during application of radiofrequency energy on ablation lesion characteristics

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The efficient delivery of radiofrequency (RF) energy through an endocardial ablation catheter is affected by variable tissue contact due to cardiac motion with myocardial contraction and respiration. In addition, many operators intentionally move an ablation catheter during the delivery of radiofrequency energy when targeting specific arrhythmias that require lines of conduction block such as atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. We sought to characterize and quantify any effects of catheter movement and intermittent ablation catheter contact on lesion characteristics.

Methods

An ex vivo model consisting of recently excised viable bovine myocardium, a circulating saline bath at 37 °C, a submersible load cell, and a deflectable sheath with an ablation catheter was assembled. A stepper motor attached to an ablation catheter apparatus was programmed to simulate linear drag lesions and series of point lesions with variable contact using constant force. Lesion volumes were analyzed using a digital micrometer by measuring depth, max width, depth at max width, and surface width and compared.

Results

The drag lesion was significantly larger than a point-by-point linear lesion using a constant force of 15 g (2,088 ± 122 mm3 vs. 1,595 ± 121.6; p = 0.01) when controlling for RF time and power. For single point lesion assessment, constant contact lesions were significantly larger than lesions created with intermittent contact using the same duration of RF (194 ± 68 mm3 vs. 112.5 ± 53; p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in lesion size between the constant contact at 60 s and 90-s intermittent contact lesions (194 ± 68 mm3 vs.186 ± 69).

Conclusions

In our ex vivo model, externally irrigated radiofrequency catheters produced drag lesion volumes equal to or larger than those created by a point-by-point method. We also found decreased lesion size due to intermittent contact can be overcome by increasing duration of ablation time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nakagawa, H., Yamanashi, W. S., Pitha, J. V., Arruda, M., Wang, X., Ohtomo, K., et al. (1995). Comparison of in vivo tissue temperature profile and lesion geometry for radiofrequency ablation with a saline-irrigated electrode versus temperature control in a canine thigh muscle preparation. Circulation, 91, 2264–2273.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wood, M. A., Goldberg, S. M., Parvez, B., Pathak, V., Holland, K., Ellenbogen, A. L., et al. (2009). Effect of electrode orientation on lesion sizes produced by irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheters. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 20, 1262–1268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thiagalingam, A., D’avila, A., Foley, L., Guerrero, J. L., Lambert, H., Leo, G., et al. (2010). Importance of catheter contact force during irrigated radiofrequency ablation: evaluation in a porcine ex vivo model using a force-sensing catheter. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 21, 806–811.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shah, D. C., Lambert, H., Nakagawa, H., Langenkamp, A., Aeby, N., & Leo, G. (2010). Area under the real-time contact force curve (force–time integral) predicts radiofrequency lesion size in an in vitro contractile model. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 21, 1038–1043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Demazumder, D., Mirotznik, M. S., & Schwartzman, D. (2001). Comparison of irrigated electrode designs for radiofrequency ablation of myocardium. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 5, 391–400.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nakagawa, H., Wittkampf, F. H. M., Yamanashi, W. S., Pitha, J. V., Imai, S., Campbell, B., et al. (1998). Inverse relationship between electrode size and lesion size during radiofrequency ablation with active electrode cooling. Circulation, 98, 458–465.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jaïs, P., Hocini, M., Hsu, L.-F., Sanders, P., Scavee, C., Weerasooriya, R., et al. (2004). Technique and results of linear ablation at the mitral isthmus. Circulation, 110, 2996–3002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miyazaki, S., Takahashi, A., Kuwahara, T., Kobori, A., Yokoyama, Y., Nozato, T., et al. (2007). Randomized comparison of the continuous vs point-by-point radiofrequency ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus for atrial flutter. Circulation Journal, 71, 1922–1926.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Okumura, Y., Johnson, S. B., Bunch, T. J., Henz, B. D., O’brien, C. J., & Packer, D. L. (2008). A systematical analysis of in vivo contact forces on virtual catheter tip/tissue surface contact during cardiac mapping and intervention. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 19, 632–640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yokokawa, M., Bhandari, A. K., Tada, H., Suzuki, A., Kawamura, M., Ho, I., et al. (2011). Comparison of the point-by-point versus catheter dragging technique for curative radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 34, 15–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ernst, S., Ouyang, F., Löber, F., Antz, M., & Kuck, K.-H. (2003). Catheter-induced linear lesions in the left atrium in patients with atrial fibrillation: an electroanatomic study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 42, 1271–1282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. van Rensburg, H., Willems, R., Holemans, P., Anné, W., Ector, H., & Heidbüchel, H. (2002). Simultaneous creation and evaluation of linear radiofrequency lesions. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 6, 215–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Everett, T. H., IV, Lee, K. W., Wilson, E. E., Guerra, J. M., Varosy, P. D., & Olgin, J. E. (2009). Safety profiles and lesion size of different radiofrequency ablation technologies: a comparison of large tip, open and closed irrigation catheters. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 20, 325–335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Demazumder, D., Mirotznik, M. S., & Schwartzman, D. (2001). Biophysics of radiofrequency ablation using an irrigated electrode. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 5, 377–389.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Su, W. W., Johnson, S. B., Jain, M. K., Hall, J., & Packer, D. L. (2005). Creating continuous linear lesions in the atria: a comparison of the multipolar ablation technique versus the conventional drag-and-burn. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 16, 905–911.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McRury, I. D., Panescu, D., Mitchell, M. A., & Haines, D. E. (1997). Nonuniform heating during radiofrequency catheter ablation with long electrodes monitoring the edge effect. Circulation, 96, 4057–4064.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yokoyama, K., Nakagawa, H., Shah, D. C., Lambert, H., Leo, G., Aeby, N., et al. (2008). Novel contact force sensor incorporated in irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter predicts lesion size and incidence of steam pop and thrombus. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 1, 354–362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Bonnie Neltner for assistance in experimental setup and maintenance of the University of Colorado Ablation Biophysics Laboratory.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12401 East 17th Avenue, B136, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA

    Matthew D. Olson, Nicholas Phreaner, Joseph L. Schuller, Duy T. Nguyen, David F. Katz, Ryan G. Aleong, Wendy S. Tzou, Raphael Sung, Paul D. Varosy & William H. Sauer

Authors
  1. Matthew D. Olson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicholas Phreaner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joseph L. Schuller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Duy T. Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. David F. Katz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ryan G. Aleong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Wendy S. Tzou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Raphael Sung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Paul D. Varosy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. William H. Sauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William H. Sauer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olson, M.D., Phreaner, N., Schuller, J.L. et al. Effect of catheter movement and contact during application of radiofrequency energy on ablation lesion characteristics. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 38, 123–129 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-013-9824-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-013-9824-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation