Abstract
Neurons in vitro and in vivo have epochs of bursting or “up state” activity during which firing rates are dramatically elevated. Various methods of detecting bursts in extracellular spike trains have appeared in the literature, the most widely used apparently being Poisson Surprise (PS). A natural description of the phenomenon assumes (1) there are two hidden states, which we label “burst” and “non-burst,” (2) the neuron evolves stochastically, switching at random between these two states, and (3) within each state the spike train follows a time-homogeneous point process. If in (2) the transitions from non-burst to burst and burst to non-burst states are memoryless, this becomes a hidden Markov model (HMM). For HMMs, the state transitions follow exponential distributions, and are highly irregular. Because observed bursting may in some cases be fairly regular—exhibiting inter-burst intervals with small variation—we relaxed this assumption. When more general probability distributions are used to describe the state transitions the two-state point process model becomes a hidden semi-Markov model (HSMM). We developed an efficient Bayesian computational scheme to fit HSMMs to spike train data. Numerical simulations indicate the method can perform well, sometimes yielding very different results than those based on PS.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abeles, M., Bergman, H., Gat, I., Meilijson, I., Seidemann, E., Thishby, N., et al. (1995). Cortical activity flips among quasi stationary states. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 92, 8616–8620.
Baum, L. E., & Petrie, T. (1966). Statistical Inference for probabilistic functions of finite state Markov chains. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 37, 1554–1563.
Brown, E. N., Barbieri, R., Eden, U. T., & Frank, L. M. (2004). Likelihood methods for neural spike train data analysis. In J. Feng (Ed.), Computational neuroscience: A comprehensive approach (pp. 253–286). Boca Raton: CRC.
Brown, B. N., Barbieri, R., Ventura, V., Kass, R. E., & Frank, L. M. (2002). The time -rescaling theorem and its applications to neural spike train data analysis. Neural Computation, 14, 325–346.
Chen, Z., Vijayan, S., Barbieri, R., Wilson, M. A., & Brown, E. N. (2009). Discrete- and continuous-time probabilistic models and inference algorithms for neuronal decoding of up and down states. Neural Computation, 21, 1797–1862.
Chib, S. (1996). Calculating posterior distributions and modal estimates in Markov mixture models. Journal of Econometrics, 75, 79–97.
Cooper, D. C., Chung, S., & Spruston, N. (2005). Output-mode transitions are controlled by prolonged inactivation of sodium channels in pyramidal neurons of subiculum. PLoS Biology, 3, 1123–1129.
Corner, M. A., van Pelt, J., Wolters, P. S., Baker, R. E., & Nuytinck, R. H. (2002). Physiological effects of sustained blockade of excitatory synaptic transmission on spontaneously active developing neuronal networks-an inquiry into the reciprocal linkage between intrinsic biorhythms and neuroplasticity in early ontogeny. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 26, 127–185.
Doiron, B., Chacron, M. J., Maler, L., Longtin, A., & Bastian, J. (2003). Inhibitory feedback required for network oscillatory responses to communication but not prey stimuli. Nature, 421, 539–543.
Gourevitch, B., & Eggermont, J. J. (2007). A nonparametric approach for detection of bursts in spike trains. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 160, 349–358.
Iyengar, S., & Liao, Q. (1997). Modeling neural activity using the generalized inverse Gaussian distribution. Biological Cybernetics, 77, 289–295.
Izhikevich, E. M., Desai, N. S., Walcott, E. C., & Hoppensteadt, F. C. (2003). Bursts as a unit of neural information: Selective communication via resonance. Trends in Neuroscience, 26, 161–167.
Koch, C. (2004). Biophysics of computation: Information processing in single neurons. New York: Oxford University Press.
Legendy, C. R., & Salcman, M. (1985). Bursts and recurrences of bursts in the spike trains of spontaneously active striate cortex neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 53, 926–939.
Levine, M. W. (1991). The distribution of intervals between neural impulses in the maintained discharges of retinal ganglion cells. Biological Cybernetics, 65, 459–467.
Liu, J. S., Liang, F., & Wong, W. H. (2000). The use of multiple-try method and local optimization in Metropolis sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96(454), 561–573.
Lo, F.-S., Lu, S.-M., & Sherman, S. M. (1991). Intracellular and extracellular in vivo recording of different response modes for relay cells of the cat’s lateral geniculate nucleus. Experimental Brain Research, 83(3), 17–328.
Martinson, J., Webster, H., Myasnikov, A., & Dykes, W. (1997). Recognition of temporaly structured activity in spontaneously discharging neurons in the somatosensory cortex in waking cats. Brain Research, 750, 129–140.
Rabiner, L. R. (1989). A tutorial on hidden markov modelss and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 77(2), 257–286.
Scott, S. L. (1999). Bayesian analysis of a two-state markov modulated poisson process. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 8, 662–670.
Tam, D. C. (2002). An alternate burst analysis for detecting intra-burst firings based on inter-burst periods. Neurocomputing, 44–46(C), 1155–1159.
Turnbull, L., & Gross, G. W. (2005). The string method of burst identification in neuronal spike trains. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 145, 23–35.
Wilson, H. R., & Cowan, J. D. (1972). Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. Biophysical Journal, 12, 1–24.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Action Editor: Frances K. Skinner
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tokdar, S., Xi, P., Kelly, R.C. et al. Detection of bursts in extracellular spike trains using hidden semi-Markov point process models. J Comput Neurosci 29, 203–212 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-009-0182-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-009-0182-2