Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Socioeconomic differences in lung cancer incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the associations between various socioeconomic indicators and lung cancer incidence.

Methods

We searched PubMed and EMBASE databases for studies on socioeconomic position (SEP) and lung cancer incidence published through October 2007. Random-effect model was used to pool the risk estimates from the individual studies. We stratified the analysis by adjustment strategy to investigate the influence of smoking on socioeconomic gradient in lung cancer incidence.

Results

Out of 3,288 citations, we identified 64 studies eligible for inclusion. Compared to the highest SEP level, we observed an overall increased risk in lung cancer incidence among people with low educational SEP (61%), low occupational SEP (48%), and low income-based SEP (37%). The negative social gradient for lung cancer incidence remained for most of the possible sets of pooled estimates obtained in subgroup analyses for occupational and educational SEP with less consistency for SEP based on income in studies adjusted and unadjusted for smoking. No evidence of publication bias was apparent.

Conclusion

Lung cancer incidence was associated with low educational, occupational, and income-based SEP. The association, adjusted or unadjusted for smoking, points out the importance of social position to be addressed in all discussions on cancer preventive measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF (2006) Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol 24(14):2137–2150. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.05.2308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alberg AJ, Ford JG, Samet JM (2007) Epidemiology of lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest 132(3 Suppl):29S–55S. doi:10.1378/chest.07-1347

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Parkin DM (2004) International variation. Oncogene 23(38):6329–6340. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207726

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Alberg AJ, Brock MV, Samet JM (2005) Epidemiology of lung cancer: looking to the future. J Clin Oncol 23(14):3175–3185. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.10.462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Faggiano F, Partanen T, Kogevinas M, Boffetta P (1997) Socioeconomic differences in cancer incidence and mortality, vol 138. IARC Scientific Publications, Lyon, pp 65–176

  6. Krieger N, Williams DR, Moss NE (1997) Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health 18:341–378. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.18.1.341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Galobardes B, Lynch JW, Davey Smith G (2004) Childhood socioeconomic circumstances and cause-specific mortality in adulthood: systematic review and interpretation. Epidemiol Rev 26:7–21. doi:10.1093/epirev/mxh008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ocke MC, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Feskens EJ, van Staveren WA, Kromhout D (1997) Repeated measurements of vegetables, fruits, beta-carotene, and vitamins C and E in relation to lung cancer The Zutphen Study. Am J Epidemiol 145(4):358–365

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. van Loon AJ, Brug J, Goldbohm RA, van den Brandt PA, Burg J (1995) Differences in cancer incidence and mortality among socio-economic groups (erratum appears in Scand J Soc Med 23(3):155). Scand J Soc Med 23(2):110–20

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dai XD, Lin CY, Sun XW, Shi YB, Lin YJ (1996) The etiology of lung cancer in nonsmoking females in Harbin, China. Lung cancer 14(Suppl 1):S85–S91. doi:10.1016/S0169-5002(96)90213-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. De Stefani E, Boffetta P, Brennan P et al (2005) Occupational exposures and risk of adenocarcinoma of the lung in Uruguay. Cancer Causes Control 16(7):851–856. doi:10.1007/s10552-005-2819-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dosemeci M, Hayes RB, Vetter R et al (1993) Occupational physical activity, socioeconomic status, and risks of 15 cancer sites in Turkey. Cancer Causes Control 4(4):313–321. doi:10.1007/BF00051333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hinds MW, Stemmermann GN, Yang HY et al (1981) Differences in lung cancer risk from smoking among Japanese, Chinese and Hawaiian women in Hawaii. Int J Cancer 27(3):297–302. doi:10.1002/ijc.2910270307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Katsouyanni K, Trichopoulos D, Kalandidi A, Tomos P, Riboli E (1991) A case–control study of air pollution and tobacco smoking in lung cancer among women in Athens. Prev Med 20(2):271–278. doi:10.1016/0091-7435(91)90026-Z

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. MacLennan R, Da Costa J, Day NE et al (1977) Risk factors for lung cancer in Singapore Chinese, a population with high female incidence rates. Int J Cancer 20(6):854–860. doi:10.1002/ijc.2910200606

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wunsch-Filho V, Moncau JE, Mirabelli D, Boffetta P (1998) Occupational risk factors of lung cancer in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Scand J Work Environ Health 24(2):118–124

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mathers CD, Loncar D (2006) Projections of global mortality, burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS medicine 3(11):e442. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7(3):177–188. doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21(11):1539–1558. doi:10.1002/sim.1186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Thompson SG, Sharp SJ (1999) Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods. Stat Med 18(20):2693–2708. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19991030)18:20<2693::AID-SIM235>3.0.CO;2-V

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. van Houwelingen HC, Arends LR, Stijnen T (2002) Advanced methods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression. Stat Med 21(4):589–624. doi:10.1002/sim.1040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (see comment). BMJ 315(7109):629–634

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG (2001) Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context, 2nd edn. BMJ, London

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bardin-Mikolajczak A, Lissowska J, Zaridze D et al (2007) Occupation and risk of lung cancer in Central and Eastern Europe: the IARC multi-center case–control study. Cancer Causes Control 18(6):645–654. doi:10.1007/s10552-007-9010-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brownson RC, Reif JS, Keefe TJ, Ferguson SW, Pritzl JA (1987) Risk factors for adenocarcinoma of the lung. Am J Epidemiol 125(1):25–34

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ekberg-Aronsson M, Nilsson PM, Nilsson JA, Pehrsson K, Lofdahl CG (2006) Socio-economic status and lung cancer risk including histologic subtyping-a longitudinal study. Lung cancer 51(1):21–29. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.08.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Faggiano F, Zanetti R, Costa G (1994) Cancer risk and social inequalities in Italy. J Epidemiol Community Health 48(5):447–452. doi:10.1136/jech.48.5.447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Goodman MT, Kolonel LN, Yoshizawa CN, Hankin JH (1988) The effect of dietary cholesterol and fat on the risk of lung cancer in Hawaii. Am J Epidemiol 128(6):1241–1255

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Krieger N, Quesenberry C Jr, Peng T et al (1999) Social class, race/ethnicity, and incidence of breast, cervix, colon, lung, and prostate cancer among Asian, Black, Hispanic, and White residents of the San Francisco Bay Area, 1988–92 United States. Cancer Causes Control 10(6):525–537. doi:10.1023/A:1008950210967

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu Q, Sasco AJ, Riboli E, Hu MX (1993) Indoor air pollution and lung cancer in Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China. Am J Epidemiol 137(2):145–154

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mackillop WJ, Zhang-Salomons J, Boyd CJ, Groome PA (2000) Associations between community income and cancer incidence in Canada and the United States. Cancer 89(4):901–912. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(20000815)89:4<901::AID-CNCR25>3.0.CO;2-I

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mao Y, Hu J, Ugnat AM, Semenciw R, Fincham S (2001) Socioeconomic status and lung cancer risk in Canada. Int J Epidemiol 30(4):809–817. doi:10.1093/ije/30.4.809

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Shaw GL, Falk RT, Pickle LW, Mason TJ, Buffler PA (1991) Lung cancer risk associated with cancer in relatives. J Clin Epidemiol 44(4–5):429–437. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(91)90082-K

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Stellman SD, Chen Y, Muscat JE et al (2003) Lung cancer risk in white and black Americans. Ann Epidemiol 13(4):294–302. doi:10.1016/S1047-2797(02)00420-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Xu ZY, Blot WJ, Xiao HP et al (1989) Smoking, air pollution, and the high rates of lung cancer in Shenyang, China. J Natl Cancer Inst 81(23):1800–1806. doi:10.1093/jnci/81.23.1800

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Marshall B, Chevalier A, Garillon C, Goldberg M, Coing F (1999) Socioeconomic status, social mobility and cancer occurrence during working life: a case–control study among French electricity and gas workers. Cancer Causes Control 10(6):495–502. doi:10.1023/A:1008921720493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kubik A, Zatloukal P, Tomasek L et al (2004) Lung cancer risk among nonsmoking women in relation to diet and physical activity. Neoplasma 51(2):136–143

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Djousse L, Dorgan JF, Zhang Y et al (2002) Alcohol consumption and risk of lung cancer: the Framingham Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(24):1877–1882

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Akhmedkhanov A, Toniolo P, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Koenig KL, Shore RE (2002) Aspirin and lung cancer in women. Br J Cancer 87(1):49–53. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6600370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Beeson WL, Abbey DE, Knutsen SF (1998) Long-term concentrations of ambient air pollutants and incident lung cancer in California adults: results from the AHSMOG study Adventist Health Study on Smog. Environ Health Perspect 106(12):813–823. doi:10.2307/3434125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Boffetta P, Harris RE, Wynder EL (1990) Case–control study on occupational exposure to diesel exhaust and lung cancer risk. Am J Ind Med 17(5):577–591. doi:10.1002/ajim.4700170504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Braaten T, Weiderpass E, Kumle M, Lund E (2005) Explaining the socioeconomic variation in cancer risk in the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14(11 Pt 1):2591–2597. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Brennan P, Buffler PA, Reynolds P et al (2004) Secondhand smoke exposure in adulthood and risk of lung cancer among never smokers: a pooled analysis of two large studies. Int J Cancer 109(1):125–131. doi:10.1002/ijc.11682

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Brenner AV, Wang Z, Kleinerman RA et al (2001) Previous pulmonary diseases and risk of lung cancer in Gansu Province, China. Int J Epidemiol 30(1):118–124. doi:10.1093/ije/30.1.118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Bruske-Hohlfeld I, Mohner M, Pohlabeln H et al (2000) Occupational lung cancer risk for men in Germany: results from a pooled case–control study. Am J Epidemiol 151(4):384–395

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Droste JH, Weyler JJ, Van Meerbeeck JP, Vermeire PA, van Sprundel MP (1999) Occupational risk factors of lung cancer: a hospital based case–control study. Occup Environ Med 56(5):322–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Fortes C, Forastiere F, Farchi S et al (2003) The protective effect of the Mediterranean diet on lung cancer. Nutr Cancer 46(1):30–37. doi:10.1207/S15327914NC4601_04

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ger LP, Hsu WL, Chen KT, Chen CJ (1993) Risk factors of lung cancer by histological category in Taiwan. Anticancer Res 13(5):1491–1500

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Hayes JH, Anderson KE, Folsom AR (2006) Association between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and the incidence of lung cancer in the Iowa women’s health study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15(11):2226–2231. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Jackson LA, Wang SP, Nazar-Stewart V, Grayston JT, Vaughan TL (2000) Association of Chlamydia pneumoniae immunoglobulin A seropositivity and risk of lung cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 9(11):1263–1266

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Jahn I, Ahrens W, Bruske-Hohlfeld I et al (1999) Occupational risk factors for lung cancer in women: results of a case–control study in Germany. Am J Ind Med 36(1):90–100. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199907)36:1<90::AID-AJIM13>3.0.CO;2-V

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Knekt P, Raitasalo R, Heliovaara M et al (1996) Elevated lung cancer risk among persons with depressed mood. Am J Epidemiol 144(12):1096–1103

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Kreienbrock L, Kreuzer M, Gerken M et al (2001) Case–control study on lung cancer and residential radon in western Germany. Am J Epidemiol 153(1):42–52. doi:10.1093/aje/153.1.42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Krewski D, Lubin JH, Zielinski JM et al (2005) Residential radon and risk of lung cancer: a combined analysis of 7 North American case–control studies. Epidemiology 16(2):137–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Louwman WJ, van Lenthe FJ, Coebergh JW, Mackenbach JP (2004) Behaviour partly explains educational differences in cancer incidence in the south-eastern Netherlands: the longitudinal GLOBE study. Eur J Cancer Prev 13(2):119–125. doi:10.1097/00008469-200404000-00005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Luo RX, Wu B, Yi YN, Huang ZW, Lin RT (1996) Indoor burning coal air pollution and lung cancer—a case–control study in Fuzhou, China. Lung cancer 14(Suppl 1):S113–S119. doi:10.1016/S0169-5002(96)90217-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Moysich KB, Menezes RJ, Ronsani A et al (2002) Regular aspirin use and lung cancer risk. BMC cancer 2:31. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-2-31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Muscat JE, Stellman SD, Wynder EL (1995) Insulation, asbestos, smoking habits, and lung cancer cell types. Am J Ind Med 27(2):257–269. doi:10.1002/ajim.4700270210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Richiardi L, Boffetta P, Simonato L et al (2004) Occupational risk factors for lung cancer in men and women: a population-based case–control study in Italy. Cancer Causes Control 15(3):285–294. doi:10.1023/B:CACO.0000024223.91059.ed

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Strom SS, Wu S, Sigurdson AJ et al (1995) Lung cancer, smoking patterns, and mutagen sensitivity in Mexican–Americans. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 18:29–33

    Google Scholar 

  61. Suzuki I, Hamada GS, Zamboni MM et al (1994) Risk factors for lung cancer in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: a case–control study. Lung cancer 11(3–4):179–190. doi:10.1016/0169-5002(94)90538-X

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Trichopoulos D, Kalandidi A, Sparros L, MacMahon B (1981) Lung cancer and passive smoking. Int J Cancer 27(1):1–4. doi:10.1002/ijc.2910270102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. van Loon AJ, Goldbohm RA, Kant IJ et al (1997) Socioeconomic status and lung cancer incidence in men in The Netherlands: is there a role for occupational exposure? J Epidemiol Community Health 51(1):24–29. doi:10.1136/jech.51.1.24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Xu X, Kelsey KT, Wiencke JK, Wain JC, Christiani DC (1996) Cytochrome P450 CYP1A1 MspI polymorphism and lung cancer susceptibility. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 5(9):687–692

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Xu Z, Brown LM, Pan GW et al (1996) Cancer risks among iron and steel workers in Anshan, China, Part II: case–control studies of lung and stomach cancer. Am J Ind Med 30(1):7–15. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199607)30:1<7::AID-AJIM2>3.0.CO;2-#

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Akiba S, Kato H, Blot WJ (1986) Passive smoking and lung cancer among Japanese women. Cancer Res 46(9):4804–4807

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Armadans-Gil L, Vaque-Rafart J, Rossello J, Olona M, Alseda M (1999) Cigarette smoking and male lung cancer risk with special regard to type of tobacco. Int J Epidemiol 28(4):614–619. doi:10.1093/ije/28.4.614

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Cassidy A, Myles JP, Duffy SW, Liloglou T, Field JK (2006) Family history and risk of lung cancer: age-at-diagnosis in cases and first-degree relatives. Br J Cancer 95(9):1288–1290. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Darby S, Whitley E, Doll R, Key T, Silcocks P (2001) Diet, smoking and lung cancer: a case–control study of 1000 cases and 1500 controls in South-West England. Br J Cancer 84(5):728–735. doi:10.1054/bjoc.2000.1668

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Holst PA, Kromhout D, Brand R (1988) For debate: pet birds as an independent risk factor for lung cancer. BMJ 297(6659):1319–1321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Martin JC, Imbernon E, Goldberg M, Chevalier A, Bonenfant S (2000) Occupational risk factors for lung cancer in the French electricity and gas industry: a case–control survey nested in a cohort of active employees. Am J Epidemiol 151(9):902–912

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Nyberg F, Gustavsson P, Jarup L et al (2000) Urban air pollution and lung cancer in Stockholm. Epidemiology 11(5):487–495

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Pukkala E, Guo J, Kyyronen P et al (2005) National job-exposure matrix in analyses of census-based estimates of occupational cancer risk. Scand J Work Environ Health 31(2):97–107

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Fontham ET, Correa P, Reynolds P et al (1994) Environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer in nonsmoking women. A multicenter study. JAMA 271(22):1752–1759. doi:10.1001/jama.271.22.1752

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Gorlova OY, Zhang Y, Schabath MB et al (2006) Never smokers and lung cancer risk: a case–control study of epidemiological factors. Int J Cancer 118(7):1798–1804. doi:10.1002/ijc.21561

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Parent ME, Siemiatycki J, Renaud G (1996) Case–control study of exposure to carbon black in the occupational setting and risk of lung cancer. Am J Ind Med 30(3):285–292. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199609)30:3<285::AID-AJIM6>3.0.CO;2-Y

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Pillow PC, Hursting SD, Duphorne CM et al (1997) Case–control assessment of diet and lung cancer risk in African Americans and Mexican Americans. Nutr Cancer 29(2):169–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Hein HO, Suadicani P, Gyntelberg F (1992) Lung cancer risk and social class. The Copenhagen male study-17-year follow up. Dan Med Bull 39(2):173–176

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Knekt P, Heliovaara M, Rissanen A et al (1991) Leanness and lung-cancer risk. Int J Cancer 49(2):208–213. doi:10.1002/ijc.2910490211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Geyer S, Hemstrom O, Peter R, Vagero D (2006) Education, income, and occupational class cannot be used interchangeably in social epidemiology. Empirical evidence against a common practice. J Epidemiol Community Health 60(9):804–810. doi:10.1136/jech.2005.041319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Davey Smith G, Hart C, Hole D et al (1998) Education and occupational social class: which is the more important indicator of mortality risk? J Epidemiol Community Health 52(3):153–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Boffetta P, Kogevinas M, Westerholm P, Saracci R (1997) Exposure to occupational carcinogens and social class differences in cancer occurrence, vol 138. IARC Scientific Publications, Lyon, pp 331–41

  83. Potter JD (1997) Diet and cancer: possible explanations for the higher risk of cancer in the poor, vol 138. IARC Scientific Publications, Lyon, pp 265–83

  84. Kawaski I, Lochner K (1997) Socioeconomic status. Cancer Causes Control 8(Suppl 1):S39–S42. doi:10.1023/A:1018479020716

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. de Kok IM, van Lenthe FJ, Avendano M et al (2008) Childhood social class and cancer incidence: results of the globe study. Soc Sci Med 66(5):1131–1139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Hanson MD, Chen E (2007) Socioeconomic status and health behaviors in adolescence: a review of the literature. J Behav Med 30(3):263–285. doi:10.1007/s10865-007-9098-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Hegewald MJ, Crapo RO (2007) Socioeconomic status and lung function. Chest 132(5):1608–1614. doi:10.1378/chest.07-1405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Laaksonen M, Rahkonen O, Karvonen S, Lahelma E (2005) Socioeconomic status and smoking: analysing inequalities with multiple indicators. Eur J Pub Health 15(3):262–269. doi:10.1093/eurpub/cki115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Schaap MM, van Agt HM, Kunst AE (2008) Identification of socioeconomic groups at increased risk for smoking in European countries: looking beyond educational level. Nicotine Tob Res 10(2):359–369. doi:10.1080/14622200701825098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Banks J, Marmot M, Oldfield Z, Smith JP (2006) Disease and disadvantage in the United States and in England. JAMA 295(17):2037–2045. doi:10.1001/jama.295.17.2037

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Smith GD, Phillips AN (1992) Confounding in epidemiological studies: why “independent” effects may not be all they seem. BMJ 305(6856):757–759

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Molarius A, Parsons RW, Dobson AJ et al (2001) Trends in cigarette smoking in 36 populations from the early 1980s to the mid-1990s: findings from the WHO MONICA Project. Am J Public Health 91(2):206–212. doi:10.2105/AJPH.91.2.206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Brennan P, Fortes C, Butler J et al (2000) A multicenter case–control study of diet and lung cancer among non-smokers. Cancer Causes Control 11(1):49–58. doi:10.1023/A:1008909519435

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. van Loon AJ, Goldbohm RA, van den Brandt PA (1995) Lung cancer: is there an association with socioeconomic status in The Netherlands? J Epidemiol Community Health 49(1):65–69. doi:10.1136/jech.49.1.65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Bentley R, Kavanagh AM, Subramanian SV, Turrell G (2008) Area disadvantage, individual socio-economic position, and premature cancer mortality in Australia 1998 to 2000: a multilevel analysis. Cancer Causes Control 19(2):183–193. doi:10.1007/s10552-007-9084-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Hart CL, Hole DJ, Gillis CR et al (2001) Social class differences in lung cancer mortality: risk factor explanations using two Scottish cohort studies. Int J Epidemiol 30(2):268–274. doi:10.1093/ije/30.2.268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Devesa SS, Diamond EL (1983) Socioeconomic and racial differences in lung cancer incidence. Am J Epidemiol 118(6):818–831

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Meta-analysis was supported by grant from the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (FAS 2006-0230). The study founder had no role in the design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data, or in the writing or decision to submit the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Social Medicine, Unit of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Norrbacka, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, 17176, Sweden

    Anna Sidorchuk, Emilie E. Agardh, Olatunde Aremu, Peter Allebeck & Tahereh Moradi

  2. Division of Public Health Epidemiology, Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Norrbacka, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, 17176, Sweden

    Johan Hallqvist

  3. Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

    Johan Hallqvist

Authors
  1. Anna Sidorchuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emilie E. Agardh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Olatunde Aremu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Johan Hallqvist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Peter Allebeck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tahereh Moradi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Sidorchuk.

Additional information

This work was performed in the Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Social Medicine/Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(DOC 279 kb)

(DOC 72 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sidorchuk, A., Agardh, E.E., Aremu, O. et al. Socioeconomic differences in lung cancer incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Causes Control 20, 459–471 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-009-9300-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-009-9300-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation