Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk in a Mediterranean population: a nested case–control study in the EPIC Florence cohort

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Mammographic breast density (MBD) has been consistently associated with breast cancer (BC) risk, and at the same time it is modulated by established BC risk factors related to reproductive and hormonal history and to lifestyle. We aimed to evaluate the association between the clinical breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), a qualitative MBD classification used in clinical setting, and BC risk through a case–control nested in the EPIC Florence cohort where baseline information on reproductive history, lifestyle and anthropometry were collected.

Methods

The study includes 136 newly diagnosed BC cases and 635 controls from the 10,083 healthy women enroled in the cohort between 1993 and 1998 and followed for 6 years on average. MBD was assessed on a negative mammogram performed at least one year before diagnosis in cases and on a mammogram performed in the same period for controls matched for age, enrolment date and menopausal status. Multivariate analyses adjusted for education, body mass index, parity, number of children, breastfeeding, BC family history, history of breast biopsies and Hormone Replacement Therapy use were performed.

Results

An increase in BC risk across BI-RADS categories emerged with adjusted odds ratios (OR) 1.79 (95% CI 1.06–3.01), OR 2.09 (95% CI 1.17–3.74) and OR 2.67 (95% CI 1.08–6.62) for categories 2, 3 and 4 in comparison with the reference category (p for trend = 0.008).

Conclusions

We confirm in this Mediterranean population the association of increasing MBD, classified according to BI-RADS with BC risk also taking into account other well-known risk factors for this neoplasm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BC:

Breast cancer

BI-RADS:

Breast imaging reporting and data system

BMI:

Body mass index

EPIC:

European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition

HRT:

Hormone replacement therapy

MBD:

Mammographic breast density

OR:

Odds ratio

References

  1. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, Sun L, Stone J, Fishell E, Jong RA, Hislop G, Chiarelli A, Minkin S, Yaffe MJ (2007) Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356:227–236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I (2006) Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 15:1159–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eng A, Gallant Z, Sherpherd J, McCormack V, Li J, Dowsett M, Vinnicombe S, Allen S, dos Santos Silva I (2014) Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case control study of six alternative density assessment methods. Breast Cancer Res 16:349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Olson JE, Sellers TA, Scott CG, Schueler BA, Brandt KR, Serie DJ, Jensen MR, Wu FF, Morton MJ, Heine JJ, Couch FJ, Pankratz VS, Vachon CM (2012) The influence of mammogram acquisition on the mammographic density and breast cancer association in the Mayo Mammography Health Study cohort. Breast Cancer Res 14:R147

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Engmann NJ, Golmakani MK, Miglioretti DL, Sprague BL, Kerlikowske K, Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (2017) Population-attributable risk proportion of clinical risk factors for breast cancer. JAMA Oncol. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.6326

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Sun L, Guo H, Chiarelli A, Hislop G, Yaffe M, Minkin S (2006) Body size, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 15:2086–2092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tice JA, Miglioretti DL, Li CS, Vachon CM, Gard CC, Kerlikowske K (2015) Breast density and benign breast disease: risk assessment to identify women at high risk of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 33:3137–3143

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Palli D, Berrino F, Vineis P, Tumino R, Panico S, Saieva C, Masala G, Salvini S, Ceroti M, Decarli A, Krogh V, on behalf of EPIC-Italy (2003) A molecular epidemiology project on diet and cancer: the EPIC-Italy prospective study. Design and baseline characteristics of participants. Tumori 89:586–593

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Masala G, Ambrogetti D, Assedi M, Giorgi D, Rosselli Del Turco M, Palli D (2006) Dietary and life-style determinants of mammographic breast density. A longitudinal study in a Mediterranean population. Int J Cancer 118:1782–1789

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. American College of Radiology (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS®), 4th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  11. Assi V, Warwick J, Cuzick J, Duffy SW (2011) Clinical and epidemiological issues in mammographic density. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 9:33–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Winkel RR, von Euler-Chelpin M, Nielsen M, Petersen K, Lillholm M, Nielsen MB, Lynge E, Uldall WY, Vejborg I (2016) Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study. BMC Cancer 16:414

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Razzaghi H, Troester MA, Gierach GL, Olshan AF, Yankaskas BC, Millikan RC (2012) Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in White and African American Women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 135:571–580

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Jeffers AM, Sieh W, Lipson JA, Rothstein JH, McGuire V, Whittemore AS, Rubin DL (2017) Breast cancer risk and mammographic density assessed with semiautomated and fully automated methods and BI-RADS. Radiology 282:348–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ziv E, Tice J, Smith-Bindman R, Shepherd J, Cummings S, Kerlikowske K (2004) Mammographic density and estrogen receptor status of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 13:2090–2095

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Phipps AI, Buist DS, Malone KE, Barlow WE, Porter PL, Kerlikowske K, O’Meara ES, Li CI (2012) Breast density, body mass index, and risk of tumor marker-defined subtypes of breast cancer. Ann Epidemiol 22:340–348

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, Corle DK, Green SB, Schairer C, Mulvihill JJ (1989) Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1879–1886

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Decarli A, Calza S, Masala G, Specchia C, Palli D, Gail MH (2006) Gail model for prediction of absolute risk of invasive breast cancer: independent evaluation in the Florence-European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition cohort. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1686–1693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tice JA, Cummings SR, Smith-Bindman R, Ichikawa L, Barlow WE, Kerlikowske K (2008) Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model. Ann Intern Med 148:337–347

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Tice JA (2013) o’Meara ES, Weaver DL, Vachon C, Ballard-Barbash R, Kerilowske K (2013) Benign breast disease, mammographic breast density, and the risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 105:1043–1049

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all EPIC Florence participants. The study has been supported by a grant from Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC, Milan, Italy).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cancer Risk Factors and Lifestyle Epidemiology Unit, Cancer Research and Prevention Institute – ISPO, Florence, Italy

    Giovanna Masala, Melania Assedi, Benedetta Bendinelli, Saverio Caini & Domenico Palli

  2. Breast Cancer Screening Branch, Cancer Research and Prevention Institute – ISPO, Florence, Italy

    Daniela Ambrogetti

Authors
  1. Giovanna Masala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniela Ambrogetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Melania Assedi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Benedetta Bendinelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Saverio Caini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Domenico Palli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanna Masala.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study has been approved by the local Florence Ethical Committee (2001/96) and have been performed in accordance with the ethical standard as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Masala, G., Ambrogetti, D., Assedi, M. et al. Mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk in a Mediterranean population: a nested case–control study in the EPIC Florence cohort. Breast Cancer Res Treat 164, 467–473 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4274-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4274-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation