Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Accuracy of Un-supervised Versus Provider-Supervised Self-administered HIV Testing in Uganda: A Randomized Implementation Trial

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unsupervised HIV self-testing (HST) has potential to increase knowledge of HIV status; however, its accuracy is unknown. To estimate the accuracy of unsupervised HST in field settings in Uganda, we performed a non-blinded, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial of unsupervised compared with supervised HST among selected high HIV risk fisherfolk (22.1 % HIV Prevalence) in three fishing villages in Uganda between July and September 2013. The study enrolled 246 participants and randomized them in a 1:1 ratio to unsupervised HST or provider-supervised HST. In an intent-to-treat analysis, the HST sensitivity was 90 % in the unsupervised arm and 100 % among the provider-supervised, yielding a difference 0f −10 % (90 % CI −21, 1 %); non-inferiority was not shown. In a per protocol analysis, the difference in sensitivity was −5.6 % (90 % CI −14.4, 3.3 %) and did show non-inferiority. We conclude that unsupervised HST is feasible in rural Africa and may be non-inferior to provider-supervised HST.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. UNAIDS. UNAIDS report on the Global AIDS epidemic 2013. 2013.

  2. Bajunirwe F, Muzoora M. Barriers to the implementation of programs for the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV: a cross-sectional survey in rural and urban Uganda. AIDS Res Ther. 2005;2(1):10.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mugisha E, van Rensburg GH, Potgieter E. Factors influencing utilization of voluntary counseling and testing service in Kasenyi fishing community in Uganda. JANAC. 2010;21(6):503–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wanyenze RK, Kamya MR, Fatch R, Mayanja-Kizza H, Baveewo S, Sawires S, et al. Missed opportunities for HIV testing and late-stage diagnosis among HIV-infected patients in Uganda. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(7):e21794.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Choko AT, Desmond N, Webb EL, Chavula K, Napierala-Mavedzenge S, Gaydos CA, et al. The uptake and accuracy of oral kits for HIV self-testing in high HIV prevalence setting: a cross-sectional feasibility study in Blantyre, Malawi. PLoS Med. 2011;8(10):e1001102.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Spielberg F, Levine RO, Weaver M. Self-testing for HIV: a new option for HIV prevention? Lancet Infect Dis. 2004;4(10):640–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Asiki G, Mpendo J, Abaasa A, Agaba C, Nanvubya A, Nielsen L, et al. HIV and syphilis prevalence and associated risk factors among fishing communities of Lake Victoria, Uganda. Sex Transm Infect. 2011;87(6):511–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Seeley J, Nakiyingi-Miiro J, Kamali A, Mpendo J, Asiki G, Abaasa A, et al. High HIV incidence and socio-behavioral risk patterns in fishing communities on the shores of Lake Victoria, Uganda. Sex Transm Dis. 2012;39(6):433–9 Epub 2012/05/18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kiwanuka N, Ssetaala A, Mpendo J, Wambuzi M, Nanvubya A, Sigirenda S, et al. High HIV-1 prevalence, risk behaviours, and willingness to participate in HIV vaccine trials in fishing communities on Lake Victoria, Uganda, 2013.

  10. Kalibala STW, Muraah TW, Cherutich P, Oweya E, Oluoch P. ‘Knowing myself first’: feasibility of self-testing among health workers in Kenya. Nairobi: The Population Council Inc; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Napierala Mavedzenge S, Baggaley R, Corbett EL. A review of self-testing for HIV: research and policy priorities in a new era of HIV prevention. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57(1):126–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lemke MR, Mendonca RJ. A question of accessibility: understanding lay users of medical devices. Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology/Association For The Advancement Of Medical Instrumentation. 2013;Suppl:20–25.

  13. Galiwango RM, Musoke R, Lubyayi L, Ssekubugu R, Kalibbala S, Ssekweyama V, et al. Evaluation of current rapid HIV test algorithms in Rakai, Uganda. J Virol Met. 2013;192(1–2):25–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. OraSure Technologies I. Summary of safety and effectiveness, Oraquick. http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/BloodBloodProducts/ApprovedProducts/PremarketApprovalsPMAs/ucm310436.htm. Accessed 3 July 2012.

  15. Ng OT, Chow AL, Lee VJ, Chen MIC, Win MK, Tan HH, et al. Accuracy and user-acceptability of HIV self-testing using an oral fluid-based HIV rapid test. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(9):e45168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Delaney KP, Branson BM, Uniyal A, Kerndt PR, Keenan PA, Jafa K, et al. Performance of an oral fluid rapid HIV-1/2 test: experience from four CDC studies. Aids. 2006;20(12):1655–1660. doi:10.097/01.aids.0000238412.75324.82.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wesolowski LG, MacKellar DA, Facente SN, Dowling T, Ethridge SF, Zhu JH, et al. Post-marketing surveillance of OraQuick whole blood and oral fluid rapid HIV testing. Aids. 2006;20(12):1661–1666 doi:10.097/01.aids.0000238413.13442.ed.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pant Pai N, Balram B, Shivkumar S, Martinez-Cajas JL, Claessens C, Lambert G, et al. Head-to-head comparison of accuracy of a rapid point-of-care HIV test with oral versus whole-blood specimens: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12(5):373–380.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pascoe SJ, Langhaug LF, Mudzori J, Burke E, Hayes R, Cowan FM. Field evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of an oral fluid rapid test for HIV, tested at point-of-service sites in rural Zimbabwe. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2009;23(7):571–6 Epub 2009/06/18.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lu Y, Jin H, Genant HK. On the non-inferiority of a diagnostic test based on paired observations. Stat Med. 2003;22(19):3029–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank our research assistants Orishaba Carol, Tumusiime Obed and Ms Merabu. We received very useful comments from the departmental Epidemiology in Action research group led by Christopher Whalen, as well as Doctors Amara E Ezeamama, Ruanne V Barnabas, Elioda Tumwesigye and Connie Celum. Our gratitude extends to the research staff of Kabwohe Clinical Research Center, Uganda and our study participants in the fishing villages for providing us these data. This study was supported by the NIH Fogarty International Center AIDS International Training and Research Program (TW 000011-24).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Health Sciences Campus, 101 Buck Road, Miller Hall, Athens, GA, 30602, USA

    Stephen Asiimwe, James Oloya, Xiao Song & Christopher C. Whalen

  2. Kabwohe Clinical Research Center (KCRC), Kabwohe-Ishaka Road, Kabwohe, Uganda

    Stephen Asiimwe

Authors
  1. Stephen Asiimwe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James Oloya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiao Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christopher C. Whalen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Asiimwe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Asiimwe, S., Oloya, J., Song, X. et al. Accuracy of Un-supervised Versus Provider-Supervised Self-administered HIV Testing in Uganda: A Randomized Implementation Trial. AIDS Behav 18, 2477–2484 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-014-0765-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-014-0765-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation