Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Medical education: a particularly complex intervention to research

  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous debate has explored whether medical education research should become more like health services research in terms of frameworks, collaborations and methodologies. Notable recent changes in health services research include an increasing emphasis on complex interventions, defined as interventions that involve more than one component. The purpose of this study was to explore the extent of thinking about medical education as a complex intervention and to analyse medical education research to determine whether its collaborations and methodologies are becoming more like health services research. Research articles published in three journals over 2 years were analysed to determine the purpose of the research in relation to a framework for evaluating complex interventions, the degree of collaboration, and the methodology. Most studies aimed to develop theory or assess effectiveness and many categories of the complex interventions framework were not represented in the medical education research literature. Studies usually involved only one research site and were predominantly quantitative but not experimental or quasi-experimental. Whilst medical education research has not moved significantly in the direction of health services research over recent years, the complex interventions lens provided insights into why this might be so (namely the significant challenges associated with researching medical education). We recommend that medical education researchers work within a complex interventions framework and look to research fields with similar challenges (e.g. the study of chronic illness in a changing context) for ideas about theories, frameworks, methodologies and collaborations that can illuminate the field of medical education research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AcademyHealth. (2000). Health Services Research. Retrieved September 10, 2011, from www.academyhealth.org.

  • Baernstein, A., Liss, H. K., Carney, P. A., & Elmore, J. G. (2007). Trends in study methods used in undergraduate medical education research, 1969–2007. Journal of the American Medical Association, 298, 1038–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M., Fitzpatrick, R., Haines, A., Kinmonth, A. L., Sandercock, P., Spiegelhalter, D., et al. (2000). Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. British Medical Journal, 321, 694–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, N. C., Murray, E., Darbyshire, J., Emery, J., Farmer, A., Griffiths, F., et al. (2007). Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care. British Medical Journal, 334, 455–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carline, J. D. (2004). Funding medical education research: Opportunities and issues. Academic Medicine, 79, 918–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clauser, S. B., Taplin, S. H., Foster, M. K., Fagan, P., & Kaluzny, A. D. (2012). Multilevel intervention research. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 44, 127–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coast, J., Flynn, T., Sutton, E., AL-Janabi, H., Vosper, J., Lavender, S., et al. (2008). Investigating choice experiments for preferences of Older People. Health Services Research and Policy, 13, 31–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooksey, D. (2006). A review of UK health research funding. Retrieved September 8, 2011, from http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/other/0118404881/0118404881.pdf.

  • Dieppe, P., & Ades, T. (2008). Why does health services research seem so hard to fund? Health Services Research and Policy, 13, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Sawi, N. I., Sharp, G. F., & Gruppen, L. D. (2009). A small grants program improves medical education research productivity. Academic Medicine, 84, S105–S108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C. M., & Felix-Borlolotti, M. (2010). W(h)ither complexity? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16, 415–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, C. R., Finch, T., Ballini, L., MacFarlane, A., Mair, F., Murray, E., et al. (2011). Evaluating complex interventions and health technologies using normalisation process theory. BMC Health Services Research, 11, 245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, R. K. (2007). Something needs to be done. British Medical Journal. Letter in response to Todres et al. 2007. Retrieved October 14, 2011, from http://www.bmj.com/content/335/7615/333/reply.

  • Medical Research Council (2008) Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. Retrieved September 8, 2011, from http://www.mrc.ac.uk/Utilities/Documentrecord/index.htm?d=MRC004871.

  • Michie, S. (2008). Designing and implementing behaviour change interventions to improve population health. Health Services Research and Policy, 13, 64–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, G. (2010). Is experimental research passé? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15, 297–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, D. A., Cook, D. A., Beckman, T. J., Levine, R. B., Kern, D. E., & Wright, S. M. (2007). Association between funding and quality of published medical education research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 298, 1002–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandars, J. E. (2007). Only half the story! British Medical Journal. Letter in response to Todres et al. 2007. Retrieved October 14, 2011, from http://www.bmj.com/content/335/7615/333/reply.

  • Schuwirth, L. W., & van der Vleuten, C. P. (2006). Challenges for educationalists. British Medical Journal, 333, 544–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J., & Prideaux, D. (2005). Medical education research: Being strategic. Medical Education, 39, 544–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. (2001). Mind the gap: Some reasons why medical education research is different from health services research. Medical Education, 35, 319–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, J. A., Arnold, L., & Mann, K. V. (2004). A RIME perspective on the quality and relevance of current and future medical education research. Academic Medicine, 79, 931–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todres, M., Stephenson, A., & Jones, R. (2007). Medical education research remains the poor relation. British Medical Journal, 335, 333–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt, G. C. M. (2005). Where health services research has led, medical education research may follow. Medical Education, 39, 555–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Bradley Yee and Martin Roberts for their help with the data analysis.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca Barnes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mattick, K., Barnes, R. & Dieppe, P. Medical education: a particularly complex intervention to research. Adv in Health Sci Educ 18, 769–778 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9415-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-012-9415-7

Keywords

Navigation