Abstract
Purpose
To determine the extent to which the clinical manifestations of a cohort of people undergoing surgery for lumbosacral nerve root compression satisfy those described in The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance.
Method
We studied consecutive admissions for lumbar nerve root decompression surgery at two neurosurgical units. Pre-operatively, each person’s clinical manifestations were documented and compared with NICE’s description. Post-operatively, at three time points (within 48 h, 3 months, 12 months), each person rated their symptoms as either better, the same, or worse.
Results
Pre-operatively, one person (0.8 %), from 123 admissions, under 20 different consultant neurosurgeons, had manifestations consistent with NICE’s clinical description of lumbar nerve root compression. Post-operatively, self-reported benefit associated with surgery appeared high, at all three time points (78–91 %), supporting the diagnosis of symptomatic nerve root compression and the value of surgery.
Conclusions
In this small sample, from two units, NICE’s description of the clinical manifestations of lumbar nerve root compression did not describe 99 % of people having surgery for it. Using NICE’s definition to triage people with low back pain could result in prolonged symptoms and delayed treatment. Diagnosing lumbar nerve root compression is complex. NICE’s guidance requires examination.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) is a non-departmental public body of the Department of Health in the United Kingdom, serving both the English NHS and the Welsh NHS.
References
Walker BF (2000) The prevalence of low back pain: a systematic review of the literature from 1966 to 1998. J Spinal Disord 13(3):205–217
Baron R, Elashaal A, Germon T, Hobart J (2006) Measuring outcomes in cervical spine surgery: think twice before using the SF-36. Spine 31(22):2575–2584
Hobart JC, Cano SJ, Zajicek JP, Thompson AJ (2007) Rating scales as outcomes measures for clinical trials in neurology: problems, solutions, and recommendations. Lancet Neurol 6:1094–1105
Tsang KT, Hobart JC, Sudhakar N, Germon TJ (2010) Spinal surgery: do current measures measure what needs to be measured? J Bone Joint Surg 92(supp III):381
Konstantinou K, Dunn K (2008) Sciatica: review of epidemiological studies and prevalence estimates. Spine 33(22):2462–2472
Waddell G, Main CJ, Morris EW, Venner RM, Rae PS, Sharmy SH, Galloway H (1982) Normality and reliability in the clinical assessment of backache. Br Med J 284(6328):1519
Clinical Standards Advisory Group (1994) Back pain. HMSO, London
Waddell G (1998) The back pain revolution. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh
Vroomen PC, de Krom MC, Wilmink JT, Kester AD, Knottnerus JA (1999) Lack of effectiveness of bed rest for sciatica. N Engl J Med 340:418–423
Lewis R, Wiliams N, Matar HE, Din N, Fitzsimmons D, Philips C et al (2011) The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of management strategies for sciatica: systematic review and economic model. Health Technol Assess 15(39):1–578
Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Tosteson AN, Blood EA, Abdu WA, Herkowitz H, Hilibrand A, Albert T, Fischgrund J (2008) Surgical versus non-operative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: four-year results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine 33(25):2789–2800
Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA, Singer DE (2005) Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: 10 years results from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine 30(8):927–935
Weber H (1983) Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine 8(2):131–140
Chou R, Baisden J, Carragee EJ, Resnick DK, Shaffer W, Loeser JD (2009) Surgery for low back pain. Spine 34(10):1094–1109
Gibson JNA, Waddell G (2007) Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev 1(2):CD001350. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001350.pub4
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the people that participated, the neurosurgeons at Derriford and Frenchay Hospitals for allowing us to study their patients, and Professor Simon Rule for helpful comments on early drafts.
Conflict of inerest
None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Germon, T., Singleton, W. & Hobart, J. Is NICE guidance for identifying lumbar nerve root compression misguided?. Eur Spine J 23 (Suppl 1), 20–24 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3233-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3233-y