Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is NICE guidance for identifying lumbar nerve root compression misguided?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the extent to which the clinical manifestations of a cohort of people undergoing surgery for lumbosacral nerve root compression satisfy those described in The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance.

Method

We studied consecutive admissions for lumbar nerve root decompression surgery at two neurosurgical units. Pre-operatively, each person’s clinical manifestations were documented and compared with NICE’s description. Post-operatively, at three time points (within 48 h, 3 months, 12 months), each person rated their symptoms as either better, the same, or worse.

Results

Pre-operatively, one person (0.8 %), from 123 admissions, under 20 different consultant neurosurgeons, had manifestations consistent with NICE’s clinical description of lumbar nerve root compression. Post-operatively, self-reported benefit associated with surgery appeared high, at all three time points (78–91 %), supporting the diagnosis of symptomatic nerve root compression and the value of surgery.

Conclusions

In this small sample, from two units, NICE’s description of the clinical manifestations of lumbar nerve root compression did not describe 99 % of people having surgery for it. Using NICE’s definition to triage people with low back pain could result in prolonged symptoms and delayed treatment. Diagnosing lumbar nerve root compression is complex. NICE’s guidance requires examination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) is a non-departmental public body of the Department of Health in the United Kingdom, serving both the English NHS and the Welsh NHS.

References

  1. Walker BF (2000) The prevalence of low back pain: a systematic review of the literature from 1966 to 1998. J Spinal Disord 13(3):205–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/11887/44336/44336.pdf

  3. Baron R, Elashaal A, Germon T, Hobart J (2006) Measuring outcomes in cervical spine surgery: think twice before using the SF-36. Spine 31(22):2575–2584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hobart JC, Cano SJ, Zajicek JP, Thompson AJ (2007) Rating scales as outcomes measures for clinical trials in neurology: problems, solutions, and recommendations. Lancet Neurol 6:1094–1105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsang KT, Hobart JC, Sudhakar N, Germon TJ (2010) Spinal surgery: do current measures measure what needs to be measured? J Bone Joint Surg 92(supp III):381

    Google Scholar 

  6. Konstantinou K, Dunn K (2008) Sciatica: review of epidemiological studies and prevalence estimates. Spine 33(22):2462–2472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Waddell G, Main CJ, Morris EW, Venner RM, Rae PS, Sharmy SH, Galloway H (1982) Normality and reliability in the clinical assessment of backache. Br Med J 284(6328):1519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Clinical Standards Advisory Group (1994) Back pain. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Waddell G (1998) The back pain revolution. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vroomen PC, de Krom MC, Wilmink JT, Kester AD, Knottnerus JA (1999) Lack of effectiveness of bed rest for sciatica. N Engl J Med 340:418–423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lewis R, Wiliams N, Matar HE, Din N, Fitzsimmons D, Philips C et al (2011) The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of management strategies for sciatica: systematic review and economic model. Health Technol Assess 15(39):1–578

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Tosteson AN, Blood EA, Abdu WA, Herkowitz H, Hilibrand A, Albert T, Fischgrund J (2008) Surgical versus non-operative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: four-year results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine 33(25):2789–2800

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA, Singer DE (2005) Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: 10 years results from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine 30(8):927–935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Weber H (1983) Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine 8(2):131–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chou R, Baisden J, Carragee EJ, Resnick DK, Shaffer W, Loeser JD (2009) Surgery for low back pain. Spine 34(10):1094–1109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gibson JNA, Waddell G (2007) Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev 1(2):CD001350. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001350.pub4

  17. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/14212/65526/65526.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the people that participated, the neurosurgeons at Derriford and Frenchay Hospitals for allowing us to study their patients, and Professor Simon Rule for helpful comments on early drafts.

Conflict of inerest

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Germon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Germon, T., Singleton, W. & Hobart, J. Is NICE guidance for identifying lumbar nerve root compression misguided?. Eur Spine J 23 (Suppl 1), 20–24 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3233-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3233-y

Keywords

Navigation