Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Off-site training of laparoscopic skills, a scoping review using a thematic analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The focus of research in simulation-based laparoscopic training has changed from examining whether simulation training works to examining how best to implement it. In laparoscopic skills training, portable and affordable box trainers allow for off-site training. Training outside simulation centers and hospitals can increase access to training, but also poses new challenges to implementation. This review aims to guide implementation of off-site training of laparoscopic skills by critically reviewing the existing literature.

Methods

An iterative systematic search was carried out in MEDLINE, EMBASE, ERIC, Scopus, and PsychINFO, following a scoping review methodology. The included literature was analyzed iteratively using a thematic analysis approach. The study was reported in accordance with the STructured apprOach to the Reporting In healthcare education of Evidence Synthesis statement.

Results

From the search, 22 records were identified and included for analysis. A thematic analysis revealed the themes: access to training, protected training time, distribution of training, goal setting and testing, task design, and unsupervised training. The identified themes were based on learning theories including proficiency-based learning, deliberate practice, and self-regulated learning.

Conclusions

Methods of instructional design vary widely in off-site training of laparoscopic skills. Implementation can be facilitated by organizing courses and training curricula following sound education theories such as proficiency-based learning and deliberate practice. Directed self-regulated learning has the potential to improve off-site laparoscopic skills training; however, further studies are needed to demonstrate the effect of this type of instructional design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Soper NJ, Fried GM (2008) The fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery: its time has come. Bull Am Coll Surg 93(9):30–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zendejas B, Brydges R, Hamstra SJ, Cook DA (2013) State of the evidence on simulation-based training for laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg 257(4):586–593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nagendran M, Toon C, Davidson B, Gurusamy K (2014) Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with no prior laparoscopic experience. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010479.pub2

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gurusamy KS, Nagendran M, Toon CD, Davidson BR (2014) Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with limited prior laparoscopic experience. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010478.pub2

    Google Scholar 

  5. Thinggaard E, Bjerrum F, Strandbygaard J, Gogenur I, Konge L (2015) Validity of a cross-specialty test in basic laparoscopic techniques (TABLT). Br J Surg 102(9):1106–1113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gordon M, Gibbs T (2014) STORIES statement: publication standards for healthcare education evidence synthesis. doi:10.1186/s12916-014-0143-0

  7. Arksey H, O’Malley L (2005) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol Theory Pract 8(1):19–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK (2010) Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-69

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, Young B, Sutton A (2005) Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy 10(1):45–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Bello F, Darzi A (2003) Motion analysis in the training and assessment of minimally invasive surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 12(3):137–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Partridge R, Hughes M, Brennan P, Hennessey I (2015) There is a worldwide shortfall of simulation platforms for minimally invasive surgery. J Surg Simul. doi:10.1102/2051-7726.2015.0003

    Google Scholar 

  12. Benjamin AS, Tullis J (2010) What makes distributed practice effective? Cogn Psychol 61(3):228–247

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Champion H, Higgins G, Fried MP, Moses G, Smith CD, Satava RM (2005) Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg 241(2):364–372

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Gue S (1995) Home-made videoscopic trainer for operative laparoscopic surgery. Aust N Z J Surg 65:820–821

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Russo MA, Tsuda S (2010) Portable, self-practice laparoscopic box trainers underutilized by surgical trainees. In Paper presented at the 2010 scientific session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons, SAGES 2010, National Harbor, MD United States, 14 April 2010

  16. Russo M, Tsuda S (2011) Assessment of a mandatory curriculum for laparoscopic skills using a portable, self-practice box trainer outside of duty hours. In Paper presented at the 2011 Scientific Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons, SAGES San Antonio, TX United States, 30 March 2011

  17. Harvey LFB, King L, Hur HC (2013) Challenges associated with a self-contained simulation curriculum using a home laparoscopic skills trainer. In Paper presented at the 42nd Global Congress of Minimally Invasive Gynecology AAGL 2013, Washington, DC United States, 10 November 2013

  18. Zapf M, Ujiki M (2013) Surgical resident evaluations of portable laparoscopic box trainers. Surg Innov. doi:10.1177/1553350614535858

    Google Scholar 

  19. Griffin S, Kumar A, Burgess N, Donaldson P (2006) Development of laparoscopic suturing skills: a prospective trial. J Endourol 20(2):144–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Korndorffer JR Jr, Bellows CF, Tekian A, Harris IB, Downing SM (2012) Effective home laparoscopic simulation training: a preliminary evaluation of an improved training paradigm. Am J Surg 203(1):1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. De Win G, Van Bruwaene S, De Ridder D, Miserez M (2013) The optimal frequency of endoscopic skill labs for training and skill retention on suturing: a randomized controlled trial. J Surg Educ 70(3):384–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Stefanidis D, Walters KC, Mostafavi A, Heniford BT (2009) What is the ideal interval between training sessions during proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training? Am J Surg 197(1):126–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. van Empel PJ, Verdam MG, Strypet M, van Rijssen LB, Huirne JA, Scheele F, Bonjer HJ, Meijerink WJ (2012) Voluntary autonomous simulator based training in minimally invasive surgery, residents’ compliance and reflection. J Surg Educ 69(4):564–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kromann CB, Jensen ML, Ringsted C (2009) The effect of testing on skills learning. Med Educ 43(1):21–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Downing SM (2003) Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ 37(9):830–837

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Norcini JJ, Shea JA (1997) The credibility and comparability of standards. Appl Meas Educ 10(1):39–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236(4):458–463 (discussion 463–454)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Fayez R, Fried GM (2010) Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room-a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg 199(1):115–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Strandbygaard J, Bjerrum F, Maagaard M, Rifbjerg Larsen C, Ottesen B, Sorensen JL (2014) A structured four-step curriculum in basic laparoscopy: development and validation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 93(4):359–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ericsson KA (2004) Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 79(10 Suppl):S70–S81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nakamura LY, Martin GL, Fox JC, Andrews PE, Humphreys M, Castle EP (2012) Comparing the portable laparoscopic trainer with a standardized trainer in surgically naïve subjects. J Endourol 26(1):67–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Morgan D, O’Sullivan R, Prendiville W (2010) A study of a novel ‘take-home’ Laparoscopic simulator and program. In Paper presented at the 39th Global Congress of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, AAGL 2010, Las Vegas, NV United States, 11 August 2010

  33. Morgan D, Prendiville W, O’Sullivan R (2010) A laparoscopic surgical skills program utilising a ‘take-home’ laparoscopic simulator. In Paper presented at the 39th Global Congress of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, AAGL 2010, Las Vegas, NV United States, 08 November 2010

  34. Chummun K, Burke JP, O’Sullivan R, Prendiville W (2012) The influence of a ‘take home’ box trainer on laparoscopic performance for gynaecological surgeons. Gynecol Surg 9:303–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Okrainec A, Henao O, Azzie G (2010) Telesimulation: an effective method for teaching the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery in resource-restricted countries. Surg Endosc 24(2):417–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, MacRae H, Murnaghan J, Hutchison C, Brown M (1997) Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 84(2):273–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG, Bergman S, Leffondre K, Stanbridge D, Fried GM (2005) A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 190(1):107–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Butler R (1987) Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance. J Educ Psychol 79(4):474–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Manzone J, Tremblay L, You-Ten KE, Desai D, Brydges R (2014) Task- versus ego-oriented feedback delivered as numbers or comments during intubation training. Med Educ 48(4):430–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Strandbygaard J, Bjerrum F, Maagaard M, Winkel P, Larsen CR, Ringsted C, Gluud C, Grantcharov T, Ottesen B, Sorensen JL (2013) Instructor feedback versus no instructor feedback on performance in a laparoscopic virtual reality simulator: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 257(5):839–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Snyder CW, Vandromme MJ, Tyra SL, Hawn MT (2009) Proficiency-based laparoscopic and endoscopic training with virtual reality simulators: a comparison of proctored and independent approaches. J Surg Educ 66(4):201–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ritter EM, Scott DJ (2007) Design of a proficiency-based skills training curriculum for the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov 14(2):107–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Scott DJ, Ritter EM, Tesfay ST, Pimentel EA, Nagji A, Fried GM (2008) Certification pass rate of 100% for fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skills after proficiency-based training. Surg Endosc 22(8):1887–1893

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Brydges R, Manzone J, Shanks D, Hatala R, Hamstra SJ, Zendejas B, Cook DA (2015) Self-regulated learning in simulation-based training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ 49(4):368–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Brydges R, Nair P, Ma I, Shanks D, Hatala R (2012) Directed self-regulated learning versus instructor-regulated learning in simulation training. Med Educ 46(7):648–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Robinson JK, Kushner DM (2006) Development and validation of a home-based, mirrored, gynecologic laparoscopy trainer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13(2):102–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Arden D, Hacker MR, Jones DB, Awtrey CS (2008) Description and validation of the Pelv-Sim: a training model designed to improve gynecologic minimally invasive suturing skills. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15:707–711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Stovall DW, Redick DL, Prettyman ST (2010) The usefulness of a personal laparoscopic trainer in resident education. In Paper presented at the 39th Global Congress of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, AAGL 2010, Las Vegas, NV United States, 08 November 2010

  49. Rabie ME (2010) Acquiring laparoscopic suturing skills using a homemade trainer. 42 (Rabie) Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia, pp 149–151

  50. Kobayashi SA, Jamshidi R, O’Sullivan P, Palmer B, Hirose S, Stewart L, Kim EH (2011) Bringing the skills laboratory home: an affordable webcam-based personal trainer for developing laparoscopic skills. J Surg Educ 68:105–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Harrity C, Prendiville W, Ahmed S, Reus E, O’Sullivan R (2011) The benefits of a take-home trainer on the development of laparoscopic surgical skills. In Paper presented at the 20th Annual Congress ESGE, London, United Kingdom, 21 September 2011

  52. Harrity C, O’Sullivan R, Prendiville W (2012) Effects of a home-based simulation programme. In Paper presented at the 21st Annual Congress ESGE, Paris France, 14 September 2012

  53. Arthur LM, Moug SJ, Gough V, Vella M, Renwick A (2012) Laparoscopic training at home: a pilot study. In Paper presented at the 19th international congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, EAES 2011, Torino, Italy, 15 June 2011

  54. Caban AM, Guido C, Silver M, Rossidis G, Sarosi G, Ben-David K (2013) Use of collapsible box trainer as a module for Resident Education. J Soc Laparoendo 17:440–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the staff at the Hospital Research Library, Rigshospitalet, for their help and support in conducting this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ebbe Thinggaard.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Ebbe Thinggaard reports non-restricted educational grant from Johnson and Johnson. Dr. E. Matthew Ritter reports educational grant support from the Henry M. Jackson foundation for the advancement of military medicine. Drs. Jakob Kleif, Flemming Bjerrum, Jeanett Strandbygaard, Ismail Gögenur, and Lars Konge have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 84 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thinggaard, E., Kleif, J., Bjerrum, F. et al. Off-site training of laparoscopic skills, a scoping review using a thematic analysis. Surg Endosc 30, 4733–4741 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4834-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4834-9

Keywords

Navigation