Abstract
Our study aimed to objectively describe the audiological characteristics of wheeze and crackles in children by using digital stethoscope (DS) auscultation, as well as assess concordance between standard auscultation and two different DS devices in their ability to detect pathological breath sounds. Twenty children were auscultated by a paediatric consultant doctor and digitally recorded using the Littman™ 3200 Digital Electronic Stethoscope and a Clinicloud™ DS with smart device. Using spectrographic analysis, we found those with clinically described wheeze had prominent periodic waveform segments spanning expiration for a period of 0.03–1.2 s at frequencies of 100–1050 Hz, and occasionally spanning shorter inspiratory segments; paediatric crackles were brief discontinuous sounds with a distinguishing waveform. There was moderate concordance with respect to wheeze detection between digital and standard binaural stethoscopes, and 100% concordance for crackle detection. Importantly, DS devices were more sensitive than clinician auscultation in detecting wheeze in our study.
Conclusion: Objective definition of audio characteristics of abnormal paediatric breath sounds was achieved using DS technology. We demonstrated superiority of our DS method compared to traditional auscultation for detection of wheeze.
What is Known: • The audiological characteristics of abnormal breath sounds have been well-described in adult populations but not in children. • Inter-observer agreement for detection of pathological breath sounds using standard auscultation has been shown to be poor, but the clinical value of now easily available digital stethoscopes has not been sufficiently examined. |
What is New: • Digital stethoscopes can objectively define the nature of pathological breath sounds such as wheeze and crackles in children. • Paediatric wheeze was better detected by digital stethoscopes than by standard auscultation performed by an expert paediatric clinician. |
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Abbreviations
- CF:
-
Cystic fibrosis
- DS:
-
Digital stethoscope
References
Brooks D, Thomas J (1995) Interrater reliability of auscultation of breath sounds among physical therapists. Phys Ther [Internet] 75(12):1082–1088. doi:10.1093/ptj/75.12.1082
Ellington LE, Emmanouilidou D, Elhilali M, Gilman RH, Tielsch JM, Chavez M a et al (2014) Developing a reference of normal lung sounds in healthy Peruvian children. Lung 192(5):765–773. doi:10.1007/s00408-014-9608-3
Gurung A, Scrafford CG, Tielsch JM, Levine OS, Checkley W (2011) Computerized lung sound analysis as diagnostic aid for the detection of abnormal lung sounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Med 105(9):1396–1403. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2011.05.007
Holford SK (1981) Discontinuous adventitious lung sounds: measurement, classification and modeling (Thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Kevat AC, Dawson J, Davis PG, Kamlin COF (2015) Evaluation of a digital stethoscope and smart device technology for assessment of heart rate in the newborn infant. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed [Internet] 100(6):F562–F563. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2015-308639
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174
Moussavi ZK, Leopando MT, Rempel GR (1998) Automated detection of respiratory phases by acoustical means. Proc 20th Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Vol20 Biomed Eng Towar Year 2000 Beyond (Cat No98CH36286). 20(1):21–4. doi:10.1109/IEMBS.1998.745812
Pasterkamp H, Kraman SS, Wodicka GR (1997) Respiratory sounds: advances beyond the stethoscope. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 156(3):974–987. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.156.3.9701115
Prodhan P, Dela Rosa RS, Shubina M, Haver KE, Matthews BD, Buck S et al (2008) Wheeze detection in the pediatric intensive care unit: comparison among physician, nurses, respiratory therapists, and a computerized respiratory sound monitor. Respir Care 53(10):1304–1309
Reichert S, Gass R, Brandt C, Andrès E (2008) Analysis of respiratory sounds: state of the art. Clin Med Circ Respirat Pulm Med 2:45–58
Spiteri MA, Cook DG, Clarke SW (1988) Reliability of eliciting physical signs in examination of the chest. Lancet 331(8590):873–875. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(88)91613-3
Taplidou SA, Hadjileontiadis LJ (2007) Wheeze detection based on time-frequency analysis of breath sounds. 37(8):1073–83. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2006.09.007
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Dr. Ajay Kevat conceived the idea for the study. All authors contributed to study design and planning. Dr. Anaath Kalirajah and Dr. Ajay Kevat wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and undertook data collection. All authors were involved in data analysis and writing of the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
No funding to declare.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Monash Health Human Research Ethics Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from a legal guardian of all participants in the study.
Additional information
Communicated by Peter de Winter
Revisions received: 3 May 2017 / 9 May 2017
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
A. Spectrogram of digitally-recorded wheeze, with characteristic rapidly alternating periodic waveform, from a patient with Cystic Fibrosis. (GIF 67 kb).
ESM 2
B. Spectrograms (8.5-s right upper quadrant samples) from first recorded patient with crackles, using Clinicloud (top) and Littman (bottom) devices; multitudinous bright very brief discontinuous crackle waveforms are visible. (GIF 4 kb).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kevat, A.C., Kalirajah, A. & Roseby, R. Digital stethoscopes compared to standard auscultation for detecting abnormal paediatric breath sounds. Eur J Pediatr 176, 989–992 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-017-2929-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-017-2929-5