Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The efficacy of diluted topical povidone-iodine rinses in the management of recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective cohort study

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis is a persistent inflammatory condition of the sinonasal mucosa despite adequate medical therapy and sinus surgery. This study aimed to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of dilute povidone-iodine (PVP-I) sinonasal rinses as an adjunctive therapy.

Methods

Prospective cohort study. Twenty-nine recalcitrant CRS patients with endoscopic evidence of ongoing inflammation and purulent discharge were prescribed 0.08% diluted PVP-I rinses. Changes to endoscopic modified Lund–Kennedy (MLK) scores at 7 weeks post-PVP-I rinsing served as the primary outcome measure.

Results

The median MLK-discharge score significantly decreased in all patients by 1.50 points post-PVP-I rinsing (p value < 0.01). The total MLK score significantly decreased in all patients by 1.50 points (p value = 0.01). Up to a 17% reduction in serum inflammatory markers was measured post-PVP-I rinsing. Sinonasal culture revealed a shift from moderate–heavy growth to lighter bacterial growth overall. Subjective SNOT-22 scores significantly improved overall by ≥ 1 minimal clinically important difference (MCID > 12; baseline median = 33; follow-up median = 20; p value < 0.01; n = 22). TSH levels increased non-significantly within normal ranges (baseline median = 1.59 mU/L; follow-up median = 1.92 mU/L; p = 0.10; n = 15). Mucociliary clearance time increased non-significantly within normal ranges (baseline median = 9 min; follow-up median = 10 min; p value = 0.53; n = 17). Olfactory Sniffin’16 scores non-significantly decreased within age-related normal ranges (baseline median = 14; follow-up median = 13; p value = 0.72; n = 18).

Conclusion

A dilute 0.08% PVP-I sinonasal rinse as an ancillary therapy in recalcitrant CRS significantly reduces signs of infection alongside notable symptom improvement, without affecting thyroid function, mucociliary clearance or olfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maina IW, Patel NN, Cohen NA (2018) Understanding the role of biofilms and superantigens in chronic rhinosinusitis. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep 6(3):253–262

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaplan A (2013) Canadian guidelines for chronic rhinosinusitis: clinical summary. Can Fam Physician 59(12):1275–1281, e528–34

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Rudmik L, Soler ZM, Hopkins C, Schlosser RJ, Peters A, White AA et al (2016) Defining appropriateness criteria for endoscopic sinus surgery during management of uncomplicated adult chronic rhinosinusitis: a RAND/UCLA appropriateness study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 6(6):557–567

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ramakrishnan Y, Shields RC, Elbadawey MR, Wilson JA (2015) Biofilms in chronic rhinosinusitis: what is new and where next? J Laryngol Otol 129(8):744–751

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Varshney R, Lee JT (2016) Current trends in topical therapies for chronic rhinosinusitis: update and literature review. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 14(2):257–271

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bigliardi PL, Alsagoff SAL, El-Kafrawi HY, Pyon J-K, Wa CTC, Villa MA (2017) Povidone iodine in wound healing: a review of current concepts and practices. Int J Surg 44:260–268

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Percival SL, Finnegan S, Donelli G, Vuotto C, Rimmer S, Lipsky BA (2016) Antiseptics for treating infected wounds: efficacy on biofilms and effect of pH. Crit Rev Microbiol 42(2):293–309

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Desrosiers M, Evans GA, Keith PK, Wright ED, Kaplan A, Bouchard J et al (2011) Canadian clinical practice guidelines for acute and chronic rhinosinusitis. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol BioMed Central 7(1):2

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gan EC, Javer AR (2018) Fungal rhinosinusitis. In: Watkinson JC, Clarke RW (eds) Scott–Brown's otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hopkins C, Gillett S, Slack R, Lund VJ, Browne JP (2009) Psychometric validity of the 22-item sinonasal outcome test. Clin Otolaryngol 34(5):447–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/imm.13090

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hopkins C, Slack R, Lund V, Brown P, Copley L, Browne J (2009) Long-term outcomes from the English national comparative audit of surgery for nasal polyposis and chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 119(12):2459–2465

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lind H, Joergensen G, Lange B, Svendstrup F, Kjeldsen AD (2015) Efficacy of ESS in chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyposis: a Danish cohort study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273(4):911–919

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim JH, Rimmer J, Mrad N, Ahmadzada S, Harvey RJ (2015) Betadine has a ciliotoxic effect on ciliated human respiratory cells. J Laryngol Otol 129(Suppl 1):S45–S50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Berkelman RL, Holland BW, Anderson RL (1982) Increased bactericidal activity of dilute preparations of povidone-iodine solutions. J Clin Microbiol 15(4):635–639

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Reimer K, Wichelhaus TA, Schäfer V, Rudolph P, Kramer A, Wutzler P et al (2002) Antimicrobial effectiveness of povidone-iodine and consequences for new application areas. Dermatology (Basel) 204(Suppl 1):114–120

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Psaltis AJ, Li G, Vaezeafshar R, Cho K-S, Hwang PH (2014) Modification of the Lund-Kennedy endoscopic scoring system improves its reliability and correlation with patient-reported outcome measures. Laryngoscope 124(10):2216–2223

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Deborah S, Prathibha K (2014) Measurement of nasal mucociliary clearance. Clin Res Pulmonol 2(2):1019

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hummel T, Kobal G, Gudziol H, Mackay-Sim A (2006) Normative data for the “Sniffin’ Sticks” including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264(3):237–243

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Doty RL, Shaman P, Dann M (1984) Development of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test: a standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function. Physiol Behav 32(3):489–502

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lawton M, Hu MTM, Baig F, Ruffmann C, Barron E, Swallow DMA et al (2016) Equating scores of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test and Sniffin’ Sticks test in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 33(C):96–101

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Gray ST, Phillips KM, Hoehle LP, Caradonna DS, Sedaghat AR (2017) The 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test accurately reflects patient-reported control of chronic rhinosinusitis symptomatology. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 7(10):945–951

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Phillips KM, Hoehle LP, Caradonna DS, Gray ST, Sedaghat AR (2018) Minimal clinically important difference for the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test in medically managed patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Clin Otolaryngol 43(5):1328–1334

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gudziol V, Lotsch JR, Hahner A, Zahnert T, Hummel T (2006) Clinical significance of results from olfactory testing. Laryngoscope 116(10):1858–1863

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lachapelle J-M, Castel O, Casado AF, Leroy B, Micali G, Tennstedt D et al (2013) Antiseptics in the era of bacterial resistance: a focus on povidone iodine. Clin Pract 10(5):579–592

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kanagalingam J, Feliciano R, Hah JH, Labib H, Le TA, Lin JC (2015) Practical use of povidone-iodine antiseptic in the maintenance of oral health and in the prevention and treatment of common oropharyngeal infections. Int J Clin Pract 69(11):1247–1256

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Isenberg SJ, Apt L, Valenton M, Sharma S, Garg P, Thomas PA et al (2017) Prospective, randomized clinical trial of povidone-iodine 1.25% solution versus topical antibiotics for treatment of bacterial keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol 176:244–253

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Foreman A, Jervis-Bardy J, Wormald P-J (2011) Do biofilms contribute to the initiation and recalcitrance of chronic rhinosinusitis? Laryngoscope 121(5):1085–1091

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Prince AA, Steiger JD, Khalid AN, Dogrhamji L, Reger C, Eau Claire S et al (2008) Prevalence of biofilm-forming bacteria in chronic rhinosinusitis. Am J Rhinol 22(3):239–245

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hoekstra MJ, Westgate SJ, Mueller S (2016) Povidone-iodine ointment demonstrates in vitro efficacy against biofilm formation. Int Wound J 14(1):172–179

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Oduwole KO, Glynn AA, Molony DC, Murray D, Rowe S, Holland LM et al (2010) Anti-biofilm activity of sub-inhibitory povidone-iodine concentrations against Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus. J Orthop Res 28(9):1252–1256

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Haley CE, Marling-Cason M, Smith JW, Luby JP, Mackowiak PA (1985) Bactericidal activity of antiseptics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 21(6):991–992

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Brugger SD, Bomar L, Lemon KP (2016) Commensal-pathogen interactions along the human nasal passages. PLoS Pathog 12(7):e1005633

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Michalová K, Moyes AL, Cameron S, Juni BA, Obritsch WF, Dvorak JA et al (1996) Povidone-iodine (betadine) in the treatment of experimental Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis. Cornea 15(5):533–536

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Huynh E, Tran P, Pham P, Hamood A (2014) 5% Betadine solution in not effective in inhibiting the growth of different gram negative and gram positive pathogens in vitro. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55(13):5787

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yoneyama A, Shimizu M, Tabata M, Yashiro J, Takata T, Hikida M (2006) In vitro short-time killing activity of povidone-iodine (Isodine Gargle) in the presence of oral organic matter. Dermatology (Basel) 212(Suppl 1):103–108

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Michalik M, Samet A, Marszałek A, Krawczyk B, Kotłowski R, Nowicki A et al (2018) Intra-operative biopsy in chronic sinusitis detects pathogenic Escherichia coli that carry fimG/H, fyuA and agn43 genes coding biofilm formation. PLoS ONE 13(3):e0192899-11

    Google Scholar 

  37. Musumeci R, Bandello F, Martinelli M, Calaresu E, Cocuzza CE (2018) In vitro bactericidal activity of 0.6% povidone-iodine eye drops formulation. Eur J Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672118802541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Payne DN, Gibson SA, Lewis R (1998) Antiseptics: a forgotten weapon in the control of antibiotic resistant bacteria in hospital and community settings? J R Soc Health 118(1):18–22

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ader AW, Paul TL, Reinhardt W, Safran M, Pino S, McArthur W et al (1988) Effect of mouth rinsing with two polyvinylpyrrolidone-iodine mixtures on iodine absorption and thyroid function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 66(3):632–635

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wolff J (1989) Excess iodide inhibits the thyroid by multiple mechanisms. Adv Exp Med Biol 261:211–244

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Nobukuni K, Kawahara S (2002) Thyroid function in nurses: the influence of povidone-iodine hand washing and gargling. Dermatology (Basel) 204(Suppl 1):99–102

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Wu D (2018) Temporary olfactory improvement in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps after treatment. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 275(9):2193–2202

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Arakeri G, Brennan PA (2011) Povidone-iodine: an anti-oedematous agent? Int J Maxillofac Surg 40(2):173–176

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pade J, Hummel T (2008) Olfactory function following nasal surgery. Laryngoscope 118(7):1260–1264

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Sara Derikvand and India Dhillon for assistance with ethics application as well as the conduct of the study.

Funding

No sources of funding were received for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Otolaryngology, St. Paul’s Sinus Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Rikesh Panchmatia, Jennifer Payandeh, Rami Al-Salman, Emily Kakande, Al-Rahim Habib, Warren Mullings & Amin R. Javer

Authors
  1. Rikesh Panchmatia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jennifer Payandeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rami Al-Salman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Emily Kakande
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Al-Rahim Habib
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Warren Mullings
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Amin R. Javer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RP: study design, data collection, data analysis and manuscript preparation. JP: study design, data collection, data analysis and manuscript preparation. RA: data collection and manuscript review. EK: data collection and manuscript review. AH: sample size calculation and manuscript review. WM: study design, data collection and manuscript review. ARJ (primary investigator): study design, manuscript review.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amin R. Javer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rikesh Panchmatia and Jennifer Payandeh are joint first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Panchmatia, R., Payandeh, J., Al-Salman, R. et al. The efficacy of diluted topical povidone-iodine rinses in the management of recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective cohort study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276, 3373–3381 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05628-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05628-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation