Abstract
Purpose
To assess T2-weighted (T2W) MRI to differentiate transition zone (TZ) prostate cancer (PCa) from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
Materials and methods
With IRB approval, 22 consecutive TZ PCa were retrospectively compared with 30 consecutive BPH (15 stromal, 15 glandular) nodules diagnosed using radical prostatectomy MRI maps. Two blinded radiologists (R1/R2) subjectively assessed the shape (round/oval vs. lenticular) and margin (circumscribed vs. blurred/indistinct) and for a T2W hypointense rim. Both radiologists segmented lesions extracting quantitative shape features (circularity, convexity and topology/skeletal branching). Statistical tests were performed using chi-square (subjective features), Mann-Whitney U (quantitative features), Cohen’s kappa/Bland-Altman and receiver-operator characteristic analysis.
Results
There were differences in the subjective analysis of the shape, margin and absence of a T2W-rim comparing TZ PCa with BPH (p < 0.0001) with moderate to almost perfect agreement [kappa = 0.56 (shape), 0.72 (margin), 0.97 (T2W-rim)]. Area under the curve (AUC ± standard error) for diagnosis of TZ PCas was shape = 0.88 ± 0.05, margin = 0.89 ± 0.04, and T2W-rim = 0.91 ± 0.04. Shape, judged subjectively, was specific (100%/94% R1/R2) with low-to-moderate sensitivity (55%/88% R1/R2). Circularity and convexity differed between groups (p < 0.001) with no difference in topology/skeletal branches (p = 0.31). Agreement in measurements was substantial for significant quantitative variables and AUC ± SE, sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of TZ PCa were: circularity = 0.98 ± 0.01, 90%/96%; convexity = 0.85 ± 0.06, 68%/97%. AUCs for circularity were higher than for subjective analysis (p = 0.01 and 0.26).
Conclusion
Subjective analysis of T2W-MRI accurately diagnoses TZ PCa with high accuracy also demonstrated for quantitative shape analysis, which may be useful for future radiogenomic analysis of transition zone tumors.
Key points
• Presence of a complete T2-weighted hypointense circumscribed rim accurately diagnoses BPH.
• Round shape accurately diagnoses BPH and can be assessed quantitatively using circularity.
• Lenticular shape accurately diagnoses TZ PCa and can be assessed quantitatively using convexity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AS:
-
Active surveillance
- AUC:
-
Area under the curve
- BPH:
-
Benign prostatic hyperplasia
- DCE:
-
Dynamic contrast enhanced
- DICOM:
-
Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine
- DWI:
-
Diffusion weighted imaging
- GU:
-
Urogenital
- IQR:
-
Interquartile range
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- PACS:
-
Picture archiving and communication system
- PCa:
-
Prostate cancer
- PI-RADS v2:
-
Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System – version 2
- PZ:
-
Peripheral zone
- ROC:
-
Receiver-operator characteristic
- RP:
-
Radical prostatectomy
- T2W:
-
T2 weighted
- TRUS:
-
Trans-rectal ultrasound
- TZ:
-
Transition zone
References
Haas GP, Sakr WA (1997) Epidemiology of prostate cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 47:273–287
Reissigl A, Pointner J, Strasser H, Ennemoser O, Klocker H, Bartsch G (1997) Frequency and clinical significance of transition zone cancer in prostate cancer screening. Prostate 30:130–135
Durkan GC, Sheikh N, Johnson P, Hildreth AJ, Greene DR (2002) Improving prostate cancer detection with an extended-core transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy protocol. BJU Int 89:33–39
Kim K, Lee JK, Choe G, Hong SK (2016) Intraprostatic locations of tumor foci of higher grade missed by diagnostic prostate biopsy among potential candidates for active surveillance. Sci Rep 6:36781
Duffield AS, Lee TK, Miyamoto H, Carter HB, Epstein JI (2009) Radical prostatectomy findings in patients in whom active surveillance of prostate cancer fails. J Urol 182:2274–2278
Quon JS, Moosavi B, Khanna M, Flood TA, Lim CS, Schieda N (2015) False positive and false negative diagnoses of prostate cancer at multi-parametric prostate MRI in active surveillance. Insights Imaging 6:449–463
Hegde JV, Mulkern RV, Panych LP et al (2013) Multiparametric MRI of prostate cancer: an update on state-of-the-art techniques and their performance in detecting and localizing prostate cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:1035–1054
de Rooij M, Hamoen EH, Fütterer JJ, Barentsz JO, Rovers MM (2014) Accuracy of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:343–351
Fusco R, Sansone M, Granata V, Setola SV, Petrillo A (2017) A systematic review on multiparametric MR imaging in prostate cancer detection. Infect Agent Cancer 12:57
Abd-Alazeez M, Ahmed HU, Arya M et al (2014) The accuracy of multiparametric MRI in men with negative biopsy and elevated PSA level--can it rule out clinically significant prostate cancer? Urol Oncol 32(45):e17–e22
Barrett T, Haider MA (2017) The emerging role of MRI in prostate cancer active surveillance and ongoing challenges. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208:131–139
Hoeks CM, Hambrock T, Yakar D et al (2013) Transition zone prostate cancer: detection and localization with 3-T multiparametric MR imaging. Radiology 266:207–217
Rosenkrantz AB, Taneja SS (2014) Radiologist, be aware: ten pitfalls that confound the interpretation of multiparametric prostate MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:109–120
Elbuluk O, Muradyan N, Shih J et al (2016) Differentiating transition zone cancers from benign prostatic hyperplasia by quantitative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 40:218–224
Chesnais AL, Niaf E, Bratan F et al (2013) Differentiation of transitional zone prostate cancer from benign hyperplasia nodules: evaluation of discriminant criteria at multiparametric MRI. Clin Radiol 68:e323–e330
Barentsz JO, Weinreb JC, Verma S et al (2016) Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 guidelines for multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging and recommendations for use. Eur Urol 69:41–49
Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL et al (2016) PI-RADS prostate imaging - reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur Urol 69:16–40
Oto A, Kayhan A, Jiang Y et al (2010) Prostate cancer: differentiation of central gland cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia by using diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 257:715–723
Sidhu HS, Benigno S, Ganeshan B et al (2017) Textural analysis of multiparametric MRI detects transition zone prostate cancer. Eur Radiol 27:2348–2358
Rosenkrantz AB, Ginocchio LA, Cornfeld D et al (2016) Interobserver reproducibility of the PI-RADS version 2 lexicon: a multicenter study of six experienced prostate radiologists. Radiology 280:793–804. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2016152542
Dinh CV, Steenbergen P, Ghobadi G et al (2016) Magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer radiotherapy. Phys Med 32:446–451
Niu XK, Chen ZF, Chen L, Li J, Peng T, Li X (2017) Clinical application of biparametric MRI texture analysis for detection and evaluation of high-grade prostate cancer in zone-specific regions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 210:549–556
Stamatakis L, Siddiqui MM, Nix JW et al (2013) Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in confirming eligibility for active surveillance for men with prostate cancer. Cancer 119:3359–3366
Montironi R, Hammond EH, Lin DW et al (2014) Consensus statement with recommendations on active surveillance inclusion criteria and definition of progression in men with localized prostate cancer: the critical role of the pathologist. Virchows Arch 465:623–628
Turkbey B, Mani H, Aras O et al (2012) Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging tumor volume with histopathology. J Urol 188:1157–1163
Amin MB, Lin DW, Gore JL et al (2014) The critical role of the pathologist in determining eligibility for active surveillance as a management option in patients with prostate cancer: consensus statement with recommendations supported by the College of American Pathologists, International Society of Urological Pathology, Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology, the New Zealand Society of Pathologists, and the Prostate Cancer Foundation. Arch Pathol Lab Med 138:1387–1405
Johnson LM, Choyke PL, Figg WD, Turkbey B (2014) The role of MRI in prostate cancer active surveillance. Biomed Res Int 2014:203906
Krishna S, Lim CS, McInnes MDF et al (2017) Evaluation of MRI for diagnosis of extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25729
Rozenberg R, Thornhill RE, Flood TA, Hakim SW, Lim C, Schieda N (2016) Whole- tumor quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient histogram and texture analysis to predict gleason score upgrading in intermediate-risk 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 206:775–782
Liu X, Zhou L, Peng W, Wang C, Wang H (2013) Differentiation of central gland prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia using monoexponential and biexponential diffusion-weighted imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 31:1318–1324
Roehrborn CG (2008) Pathology of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Int J Impot Res 20(Suppl 3):S11–S18
Schiebler ML, Tomaszewski JE, Bezzi M et al (1989) Prostatic carcinoma and benign prostatic hyperplasia: correlation of high-resolution MR and histopathologic findings. Radiology 172:131–137
Bao J, Wang X, Hu C, Hou J, Dong F, Guo L (2017) Differentiation of prostate cancer lesions in the transition zone by diffusion-weighted MRI. Eur J Radiol Open 4:123–128
Pena E, Ojiaku M, Inacio JR et al (2017) Can CT and MR shape and textural features differentiate benign versus malignant pleural lesions? Acad Radiol 24:1277–1287
Thornhill RE, Lum C, Jaberi A et al (2014) Can shape analysis differentiate free-floating internal carotid artery thrombus from atherosclerotic plaque in patients evaluated with CTA for stroke or transient ischemic attack? Acad Radiol 21:345–354
Szczypiński PM, Strzelecki M, Materka A, Klepaczko A (2009) MaZda−a software package for image texture analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 94:66–76
Akin O, Sala E, Moskowitz CS et al (2006) Transition zone prostate cancers: features, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging. Radiology 239:784–792
Lemaitre L, Puech P, Poncelet E et al (2009) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of anterior prostate cancer: morphometric assessment and correlation with radical prostatectomy findings. Eur Radiol 19:470–480
Rusu M, Purysko AS, Verma S et al (2017) Computational imaging reveals shape differences between normal and malignant prostates on MRI. Sci Rep 7:41261
Dinh AH, Melodelima C, Souchon R et al (2018) Characterization of prostate cancer with Gleason score of at least 7 by using quantitative multiparametric MR imaging: validation of a computer-aided diagnosis system in patients referred for prostate biopsy. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017171265
Le MH, Chen J, Wang L et al (2017) Automated diagnosis of prostate cancer in multi-parametric MRI based on multimodal convolutional neural networks. Phys Med Biol 62:6497–6514
Funding
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Guarantor
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Nicola Schieda, MD FRCP(C).
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and biometry
No complex statistical methods were necessary for this article. One of the authors, Dr. Rebecca E. Thornhill, provided statistical advice for this manuscript.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.
Ethical approval
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
Methodology
• retrospective
• case-control study
• performed at one institution
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krishna, S., Schieda, N., McInnes, M.D. et al. Diagnosis of transition zone prostate cancer using T2-weighted (T2W) MRI: comparison of subjective features and quantitative shape analysis. Eur Radiol 29, 1133–1143 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5664-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5664-z