Skip to main content
Log in

Neonatal brain MRI: how reliable is the radiologist’s eye?

  • Paediatric Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 16 November 2015

Abstract

Introduction

White matter (WM) analysis in neonatal brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is challenging, as demonstrated by the issue of diffuse excessive high signal intensity (DEHSI). We evaluated the reliability of the radiologist’s eye in this context.

Methods

Three experienced observers graded the WM signal intensity on axial T2-weighted 1.5T images from 60 different premature newborns on 2 occasions 4 weeks apart with a semi-quantitative classification under identical viewing conditions.

Results

The intra- and inter-observer correlation coefficients were fair to moderate (Fleiss’ kappa between 0.21 and 0.60).

Conclusion

This is a serious limitation of which we need to be aware, as it can lead to contradictory conclusions in the challenging context of term-equivalent age brain MRI in premature infants. These results highlight the need for a semiautomatic tool to help in objectively analyzing MRI signal intensity in the neonatal brain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Girard N, Raybaud C, du Lac P (1991) MRI study of brain myelination. J Neuroradiol 18:291–307

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barkovich AJ (1998) MR of the normal neonatal brain: assessment of deep structures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19:1397–1403

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kidokoro H, Neil JJ, Inder TE (2013) New MR imaging assessment tool to define brain abnormalities in very preterm infants at term. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:2208–2214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Counsell SJ, Shen Y, Boardman JP et al (2006) Axial and radial diffusivity in preterm infants who have diffuse white matter changes on magnetic resonance imaging at term-equivalent age. Pediatrics 117:376–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Counsell SJ, Allsop JM, Harrison MC et al (2003) Diffusion-weighted imaging of the brain in preterm infants with focal and diffuse white matter abnormality. Pediatrics 112:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dyet LE, Kennea N, Counsell SJ et al (2006) Natural history of brain lesions in extremely preterm infants studied with serial magnetic resonance imaging from birth and neurodevelopmental assessment. Pediatrics 118:536–548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeon TY, Kim JH, Yoo S-Y et al (2012) Neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants: comparison of infants with and without diffuse excessive high signal intensity on MR images at near-term-equivalent age. Radiology 263:518–526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. de Bruïne FT, van den Berg-Huysmans AA, Leijser LM et al (2011) Clinical implications of MR imaging findings in the white matter in very preterm infants: a 2-year follow-up study. Radiology 261:899–906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Woodward LJ, Anderson PJ, Austin NC et al (2006) Neonatal MRI to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. N Engl J Med 355:685–694

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Parikh NA, He L, Bonfante-Mejia E et al (2013) Automatically quantified diffuse excessive high signal intensity on MRI predicts cognitive development in preterm infants. Pediatr Neurol 49:424–430

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Leitner Y, Weinstein M, Myers V et al (2014) Diffuse excessive high signal intensity in low-risk preterm infants at term-equivalent age does not predict outcome at 1 year: a prospective study. Neuroradiology 56(8):669–678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Van’t Hooft J, van der Lee JH, Opmeer BC et al (2015) Predicting developmental outcomes in premature infants by term equivalent MRI: systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 4:71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Meth 9:671–675

  14. Team RC (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0

  15. Baxter B, Ravindra H, Normann RA (1982) Changes in lesion detectability caused by light adaptation in retinal photoreceptors. Investig Radiol 17:394–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Calloni S, Cinnante C, Bassi L et al (2015) Neurodevelopmental outcome at 36 months in very low birth weight premature infants with MR diffuse excessive high signal intensity (DEHSI) of cerebral white matter. Radiol Med (Torino) 1–8

  17. Hart AR, Smith MF, Rigby AS et al (2010) Appearances of diffuse excessive high signal intensity (DEHSI) on MR imaging following preterm birth. Pediatr Radiol 40:1390–1396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank N. Friedman for English language assistance and N. Girard for her friendly and contributive support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Morel.

Ethics declarations

We declare that all human studies have been approved by the local Ethics Committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. We declare that all patients gave informed consent prior to inclusion in this study.

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

IB and CA contributed equally to this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morel, B., Antoni, G., Teglas, J.P. et al. Neonatal brain MRI: how reliable is the radiologist’s eye?. Neuroradiology 58, 189–193 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-015-1609-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-015-1609-2

Keywords

Navigation