Abstract
Introduction
White matter (WM) analysis in neonatal brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is challenging, as demonstrated by the issue of diffuse excessive high signal intensity (DEHSI). We evaluated the reliability of the radiologist’s eye in this context.
Methods
Three experienced observers graded the WM signal intensity on axial T2-weighted 1.5T images from 60 different premature newborns on 2 occasions 4 weeks apart with a semi-quantitative classification under identical viewing conditions.
Results
The intra- and inter-observer correlation coefficients were fair to moderate (Fleiss’ kappa between 0.21 and 0.60).
Conclusion
This is a serious limitation of which we need to be aware, as it can lead to contradictory conclusions in the challenging context of term-equivalent age brain MRI in premature infants. These results highlight the need for a semiautomatic tool to help in objectively analyzing MRI signal intensity in the neonatal brain.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Girard N, Raybaud C, du Lac P (1991) MRI study of brain myelination. J Neuroradiol 18:291–307
Barkovich AJ (1998) MR of the normal neonatal brain: assessment of deep structures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19:1397–1403
Kidokoro H, Neil JJ, Inder TE (2013) New MR imaging assessment tool to define brain abnormalities in very preterm infants at term. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:2208–2214
Counsell SJ, Shen Y, Boardman JP et al (2006) Axial and radial diffusivity in preterm infants who have diffuse white matter changes on magnetic resonance imaging at term-equivalent age. Pediatrics 117:376–386
Counsell SJ, Allsop JM, Harrison MC et al (2003) Diffusion-weighted imaging of the brain in preterm infants with focal and diffuse white matter abnormality. Pediatrics 112:1–7
Dyet LE, Kennea N, Counsell SJ et al (2006) Natural history of brain lesions in extremely preterm infants studied with serial magnetic resonance imaging from birth and neurodevelopmental assessment. Pediatrics 118:536–548
Jeon TY, Kim JH, Yoo S-Y et al (2012) Neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants: comparison of infants with and without diffuse excessive high signal intensity on MR images at near-term-equivalent age. Radiology 263:518–526
de Bruïne FT, van den Berg-Huysmans AA, Leijser LM et al (2011) Clinical implications of MR imaging findings in the white matter in very preterm infants: a 2-year follow-up study. Radiology 261:899–906
Woodward LJ, Anderson PJ, Austin NC et al (2006) Neonatal MRI to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. N Engl J Med 355:685–694
Parikh NA, He L, Bonfante-Mejia E et al (2013) Automatically quantified diffuse excessive high signal intensity on MRI predicts cognitive development in preterm infants. Pediatr Neurol 49:424–430
Leitner Y, Weinstein M, Myers V et al (2014) Diffuse excessive high signal intensity in low-risk preterm infants at term-equivalent age does not predict outcome at 1 year: a prospective study. Neuroradiology 56(8):669–678
Van’t Hooft J, van der Lee JH, Opmeer BC et al (2015) Predicting developmental outcomes in premature infants by term equivalent MRI: systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 4:71
Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Meth 9:671–675
Team RC (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0
Baxter B, Ravindra H, Normann RA (1982) Changes in lesion detectability caused by light adaptation in retinal photoreceptors. Investig Radiol 17:394–401
Calloni S, Cinnante C, Bassi L et al (2015) Neurodevelopmental outcome at 36 months in very low birth weight premature infants with MR diffuse excessive high signal intensity (DEHSI) of cerebral white matter. Radiol Med (Torino) 1–8
Hart AR, Smith MF, Rigby AS et al (2010) Appearances of diffuse excessive high signal intensity (DEHSI) on MR imaging following preterm birth. Pediatr Radiol 40:1390–1396
Acknowledgments
The authors thank N. Friedman for English language assistance and N. Girard for her friendly and contributive support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
We declare that all human studies have been approved by the local Ethics Committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. We declare that all patients gave informed consent prior to inclusion in this study.
Conflict of interest
We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
IB and CA contributed equally to this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morel, B., Antoni, G., Teglas, J.P. et al. Neonatal brain MRI: how reliable is the radiologist’s eye?. Neuroradiology 58, 189–193 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-015-1609-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-015-1609-2