Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exercise maintains bone density at spine and hip EFOPS: a 3-year longitudinal study in early postmenopausal women

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is an important aim in the prevention of osteoporosis to stop or decelerate bone loss during the early postmenopausal years. Here we report on results of the 3-year EFOPS exercise trial in osteopenic women. The exercise strategy emphasized low-volume high-resistance strength training and high-impact aerobics. Forty-eight fully compliant women (55.1±3.3 years) with no medication or illness affecting bone metabolism participated in the exercise group (EG); 30 women (55.5±3.0 years) served as non-training controls (CG). At baseline there were no significant between-group differences with respect to physical fitness, bone mineral density, pain and nutritional status. The training consisted of two group training and two home training sessions per week. The study participants of both groups were individually supplemented with calcium and vitamin D (cholecalciferol). Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by DXA at the lumbar spine, proximal femur and distal forearm and by QCT at the lumbar spine. Speed of sound and broadband ultrasound attenuation were determined at the calcaneus by quantitative ultrasound (QUS). Pain frequency and intensity at different skeletal sites were assessed via questionnaire. After 38 months, the following within-group changes were measured: DXA lumbar spine, EG: 0.8% n.s.; CG: −3.3% P <0.001; QCT trabecular ROI, EG: 1.1% n.s; CG: −7.7% P <0.001; QCT cortical ROI, EG: 5.3% P <0.001; CG: −2.6% P <0.001; DXA total hip: EG: −0.2% n.s; CG −1.9%, P <0.001; DXA distal forearm, EG: −2.8% P <0.001; CG: −3.8% P <0.001; BUA, EG: −0.3% n.s; CG −5.4% P <0.001; SOS, EG: 0.3% n.s; CG −1.0% P <0.001. At year 3 between-group differences relative to the exercise group were: DXA lumbar spine: 4.1% P <0.001; QCT trabecular ROI: 8.8% P <0.001; QCT cortical ROI: 7.9% P <0.001; DXA total hip: 2.1%, P <0.001; DXA distal forearm: 1.0% n.s.; BUA: 5.8% P <0.05; SOS: 1.3% P <0.001. Pain frequency and intensity in the spine significantly decreased in the exercise group and increased in the control group, while no between-group differences were detected in the main joints. In summary, over a period of 3 years our low-volume/high-intensity exercise program was successful to maintain bone mineral density at the spine, hip and calcaneus, but not at the forearm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Okano H, Mizunuma H, Soda M, Kagami I, Miyamoto S, Ohsawa M, Ibuki Y, Shiraki M, Suzuki T, Shibata H (1998) The long-term effect of menopause on postmenopausal bone loss in Japanese women: results from a prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 13:303–309

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shipman AJ, Guy GW, Smith I, Ostlere S, Greer W, Smith R (1999) Vertebral bone mineral density, content and area in 8,789 normal women aged 33–73 years who have never had hormone replacement therapy. Osteoporos Int 9:420–426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cauley JA, Robbins J, Chen Z, Cummings SR, Jackson RD, LaCroix AZ, LeBoff M, Lewis CE, McGowan J, Pettinger M, Stefanick ML, Wactawski-Wende J, Watts NB (2003) Effects of estrogen plus progestin on risk of fracture and bone mineral density: the Women’s Health Initiative randomized trial. JAMA 290:1729–1738

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Burghardt M (1999) Exercise at menopause: a critical difference. Medscape Womens Health 4:1

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kelley GA, Kelley KS, Tran ZV (2000) Exercise and bone mineral density in men: a meta-analysis. J Appl Physiol 88:1730–1736

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Vuori IM (2001) Dose-response of physical activity and low back pain, osteoarthritis, and osteoporosis. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:S551–S586

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wolff I, van Croonenborg JJ, Kemper HC, Kostense PJ, Twisk JW (1999) The effect of exercise training programs on bone mass: a meta-analysis of published controlled trials in pre- and postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 9:1–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kemmler W, Engelke K (2004) A critical review of exercise training effects on bone mineral density (BMD) in early postmenopausal women. Int Sportmed J 5:67–77

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kemmler W, Engelke K., Lauber D, Weineck J, Hensen J, Kalender WA (2003) The Erlangen Fitness Osteoporosis Prevention Study (EFOPS)—a controlled exercise trial in early postmenopausal women with low bone density: first year results. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:673–683

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kemmler W, Engelke K, Lauber D, Weineck J, Hensen J, Kalender WA (2004) Impact of intense exercise on physical fitness, quality of life, and bone mineral density in early postmenopausal women. Year 2 results of the Erlangen Fitness Osteoporosis Prevention Study (EFOPS). Arch Int Med 164:1084–1091

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kalender WA, Klotz E, Süss C (1987) Vertebral bone mineral analysis: an integrated approach with CT. Radiology 164:419–423

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Investigators (1997) Measuring quality of life in women with osteoporosis. The Osteoporosis Quality of Life Study Group. Osteoporos Int 7:478–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kemmler W, Riedel H (1998) Körperliche Belastung und Osteoporose—Einfluß einer 10 monatigen Interventionsmaßnahme auf ossäre und extraossäre Risikofaktoren einer Osteoporose. Dtsch Z Sportmed 49:270–277

    Google Scholar 

  14. Turner CH (1991) Homeostatic control of bone structure: an application of feedback theory. Bone 12:203–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Frost HM (1992) The role of changes in mechanical usage set points in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 7:253–261

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Grove KA, Londeree BR (1992) Bone density in postmenopausal women: high impact vs low impact exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 24:1190–1194

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Martin D, Notelovitz M (1993) Effects of aerobic training on bone mineral density of postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 8:931–936

    PubMed  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sugiyama T, Yamaguchi A, Kawai S (2002) Effects of skeletal loading on bone mass and compensation mechanism in bone: a new insight into the “mechanostat” theory. J Bone Miner Metab 20:196–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bemben DA, Fetters NL, Bemben MG, Nabavi N, Koh ET (2000) Musculoskeletal responses to high- and low-intensity resistance training in early postmenopausal women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:1949–1957

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Heikkinen J, Kyllönen E, Kurttila-Matero E, Wilén-Rosenqvist G, Lankinen KS, Rita H, Väänänen HK (1997) HRT and exercise: effects on bone density, muscle strength and lipid metabolism. A placebo controlled 2-year prospective trial on two estrogen-progestin regimens in healthy postmenopausal women. Maturitas 26:139–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pruitt LA, Jackson RD, Bartels RL, Lehnhard HJ (1992) Weight-training effects on bone mineral density in early postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 7:179–185

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cheng S, Sipila S, Taaffe DR, Puolakka J, Suominen H (2002) Change in bone mass distribution induced by hormone replacement therapy and high-impact physical exercise in post-menopausal women. Bone 31:126–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kemmler W (1999) Einfluß unterschiedlicher Lebensabschnitte auf die belastungsabhängige Reaktion ossärer Risikofaktoren einer Osteoporose. Dtsch Z Sportmed 50:114–119

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kelley GA (1998) Exercise and regional bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a meta-analytic review of randomized trials. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 77:76–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wallace BA, Cumming RG (2000) Systematic review of randomized trials of the effect of exercise on bone mass in pre- and postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 67:10–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bailey DA, McCulloch RG (1990) Bone tissue and physical activity. Can J Sport Sci 15:229–239

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Birkhäuser M (1991) Postmenopausale Osteoporose: Pathophysiologie und Prophylaxe. Schweizerische Rundschau Medizin (Praxis) 80:418–422

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ettinger B (1988) Prevention of osteoporosis: treatment of estradiol deficiency. Obstet Gynecol 72:1–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Prevrhal S, Engelke K, Kalender WA (1999) Accuracy limits for the determination of cortical width and density: the influence of object size and CT imaging parameters. Phys Med Bio 44:751–764

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Jones PRM, Hardmann AE, Hudson A, Norgan NG (1991) Influence of brisk walking on the ultrasonic attenuation of the calcaneus in previously sedentary women aged 30–61 years. Calcif Tissue Int 49:112–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Chan K, Qin L, Lau M, Woo J, Au S, Choy W, Lee K, Lee S (2004) A randomized, prospective study of the effects of Tai Chi Chun exercise on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:717–722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kerr D, Morton A, Dick I, Prince R (1996) Exercise effects on bone mass in postmenopausal women are site-specific and load-dependent. J Bone Miner Res 11:218–225

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. McMurdo ME, Mole PA, Paterson CR (1997) Controlled trial of weight bearing exercise in older women in relation to bone density and falls. BMJ 314:569

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Preisinger E, Alacamlioglu Y, Pils K, Saradeth T, Schneider B (1995) Therapeutic exercise in the prevention of bone loss. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 74:120–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Preisinger E, Alacamlioglu Y, Pils K, Bosina E, Metka M, Schneider B, Ernst E (1996) Exercise therapy for osteoporosis: results of a randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med 30:209–212.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Qin L, Au S, Choy W, Leung P, Neff M, Lee K, Lau M, Woo J, Chan K (2002) Regular Tai Chi Chuan exercise may retard bone loss in postmenopausal women: a case-control study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83:1355–1359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Simkin A, Ayalon J, Leichter I (1987) Increased trabecular bone density due to bone-loading exercises in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. Calcif Tissue Int 40:59–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Adami S, Gatti D, Braga V, Bianchini D, Rossini M (1999) Site-specific effects of strength training on bone structure and geometry of ultradistal radius in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 14:120–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Burr DB, Milgrom C, Fyhrie D, Forwood M, Nyska M, Finestone A, Hoshaw S, Saiag E, Simkin A (1996) In vivo measurement of human tibial strains during vigorous activity. Bone 18:405–410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Milgrom C, Miligram M, Simkin A, Burr D, Ekenman I, Finestone A (2001) A home exercise program for tibial bone strengthening based on in vivo strain measurements. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 80:433–438

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Cullen DM, Smith RT, Akhter MP (2001) Bone-loading response varies with strain magnitude and cycle number. J Appl Physiol 91:1971–1976

    PubMed  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Turner CH, Forwood MR, Otter MW (1994) Mechanotransduction in bone: do bone cells act as sensors of fluid flow? Faseb J 8:875–878

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Rubin CT, Lanyon LE (1984) Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:397–402

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Robling AG, Burr DB, Turner CH (2001) Recovery periods restore mechanosensitivity to dynamically loaded bone. J Exp Biol 204:3389–3399

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Srinivasan S, Gross TS (2000) Intermittend rest enhances osteoblastic activation induced by mechanical loading. Trans Orthop Res Soc 25:628

    Google Scholar 

  46. Umemura Y, Sogo N, Honda A (2002) Effects of intervals between jumps or bouts on osteogenic response to loading. J Appl Physiol 93:1345–1348

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Turner CH, Robling AG (2004) Exercise as an anabolic stimulus for bone. Curr Pharm Des 10:2629–2641

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Kraemer WJ (1992) Endocrine responses and adaptions to strength training. In: Komi V (ed) Strength and power in sport. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 291–304

  49. Kemmler W, Wildt L, Engelke K, Pintag P, Pavel M, Bracher B, Weineck J, Kalender W (2003) Acute hormonal responses of a high impact physical exercise session in early postmenopausal women. Eur J Appl Physiol 90:199–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Turner CH (1998) Exercise as a therapy for osteoporosis: the drunk and the street lamp, revisited. Bone 23:83–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Kemmler W, Lauber D, von Stengel S, Weineck J, Kalender WA, Engelke K (2005) Exercise effects on risk factors in early postmenopausal women: 3y EFOPS results. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37:194–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the support of Sanofi-Synthelabo GmbH (Henning, Berlin, Germany) who supplied calcium and vitamin D for all study participants. We also acknowledge the supply of the Therabands by Thera-Band GmbH (Hadamar, Germany) and support by the Universitäts-Bund Erlangen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Medical Physics, University of Erlangen, Henkestrasse 91, 91054, Erlangen, Germany

    K. Engelke, W. Kemmler, C. Beeskow, R. Pintag & W. A. Kalender

  2. Institute of Sport Sciences, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany

    D. Lauber

Authors
  1. K. Engelke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. Kemmler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. Lauber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. Beeskow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R. Pintag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. W. A. Kalender
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Engelke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Engelke, K., Kemmler, W., Lauber, D. et al. Exercise maintains bone density at spine and hip EFOPS: a 3-year longitudinal study in early postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 17, 133–142 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1938-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-1938-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation