Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis: an independent 10-year survival analysis

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

One hundred forty-nine medial prostheses were implanted in 140 patients between 1988 and 1996. After a mean of 67 months 28 patients had died, without the need for revision. Seventeen prostheses were lost to follow-up. Revision surgery using a total knee prosthesis was performed in 16 cases. In four others, a lateral prosthesis was implanted subsequently to a medial one. One of these four was revised to a total knee prosthesis 6 years later. In another four cases, late complications of the meniscal bearing were treated with replacement of this bearing. The surviving prostheses were seen back after a mean of 126 months. The cumulative survival rate at 10 years was 82% for the whole population and 84% when knees with a previous high tibial osteotomy were excluded. Since these results compare poorly to the survival of total knee arthroplasty, this prosthesis is not the first-choice implant. Because it preserves a maximum of bone stock and is revised to a total prosthesis almost without difficulty, it is the first-choice implant for medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis in patients younger than 65. Further research is mandatory to confirm that this prosthesis very rarely needs revision in patients older than 75. It should not be used in osteotomized knees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Vena LM, Baldini A, Mondaini A (2003) High tibial valgus osteotomy for medial gonarthrosis: a 10- to 21-year study. J Knee Surg 16:21–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahlback S (1968) Osteoarthrosis of the knee: a radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) Suppl 277:7–72

    Google Scholar 

  3. Argenson JN, El Kohen A, Aubaniac JM, Svard UC, Sanders RJ, Plat W, O’Connor JJ, Goodfellow JW (1993) Multicentre survival study of 552 unicompartmental arthroplasty using the Oxford meniscal knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75(Supp 2):130–131

    Google Scholar 

  4. Argenson JN, O’Connor JJ (1992) Polyethylene wear in meniscal knee replacement: a one to nine-year retrieval analysis of the Oxford knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:228–232

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barrett DS, Biswas SP, MacKenney RP (1990) The Oxford knee replacement. A review from an independent centre. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72:775–778

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Berman AT, Bosacco SJ, Kirshner S, Avolio A Jr (1991) Factors influencing long-term results in high tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop 272:192–198

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Billings A, Scott DF, Camargo MP, Hofmann AA (2000) High tibial osteotomy with a calibrated osteotomy guide, rigid internal fixation, and early motion: long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:70–79

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bradley J, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1987) A radiographic study of bearing movement in unicompartmental Oxford knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69:598–601

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Buechel FF Sr (2002) Long-term followup after mobile-bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 404:40–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carr A, Keyes G, Miller R, O’Connor J, Goodfellow J (1993) Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a survival study of the Oxford meniscal knee. Clin Orthop 295:205–213

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chakrabarty G, Newman JH, Ackroyd CE (1998) Revision of unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee: clinical and technical considerations. J Arthroplasty 13:191–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Diduch DR, Insall JN, Scott WN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez D (1997) Total knee replacement in young, active patients: long-term follow-up and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:575–582

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goodfellow J, O’Connor J (1978) The mechanics of the knee and prosthesis design. J Bone Joint Surg Br 60:358–369

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goodfellow J, O’Connor J (1992) The anterior cruciate ligament in knee arthroplasty: a risk-factor with unconstrained meniscal prostheses. Clin Orthop 276:245–252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Goodfellow JW, Tibrewal SB, Sherman KP, O’Connor JJ (1987) Unicompartmental Oxford Meniscal knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2:1–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hernborg JS, Nilsson BE (1977) The natural course of untreated osteoarthritis of the knee. Clin Orthop 123:130–137

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 248:13–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jackson M, Sarangi PP, Newman JH (1994) Revision total knee arthroplasty: comparison of outcome following primary proximal tibial osteotomy or unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 9:539–542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Keating EM, Meding JB, Faris PM, Ritter MA (2002) Long-term followup of nonmodular total knee replacements. Clin Orthop 404:34–39

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kennedy WR, White RP (1987) Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee: postoperative alignment and its influence on overall results. Clin Orthop 221:278–285

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kozinn SC, Scott R (1989) Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:145–150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lewold S, Goodman S, Knutson K, Robertsson O, Lidgren L (1995) Oxford meniscal bearing knee versus the Marmor knee in unicompartmental arthroplasty for arthrosis: a Swedish multicenter survival study. J Arthroplasty 10:722–731

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:983–989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nationaal Instituut voor de Statistiek - FOD Economie, KMO Middenstand en Energie (http://statbel.fgov.be/home_nl.htm) (2004) Sterftetafels 2001 België. http://www.statbel.fgov.be/downloads/mt2001bel_nl.xls

  25. Psychoyios V, Crawford RW, O’Connor JJ, Murray DW (1998) Wear of congruent meniscal bearings in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a retrieval study of 16 specimens. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:976–982

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ranawat CS, Boachie-Adjei O (1988) Survivorship analysis and results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. Eight- to 11-year follow-up period. Clin Orthop 226:6–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ranawat CS, Flynn WF Jr, Saddler S, Hansraj KK, Maynard MJ (1993) Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty: a 15-year survivorship study. Clin Orthop 286:94–102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rees JL, Price AJ, Lynskey TG, Svard UC, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2001) Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:1034–1036

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ritter MA, Berend ME, Meding JB, Keating EM, Faris PM, Crites BM (2001) Long-term followup of anatomic graduated components posterior cruciate-retaining total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 388:51–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ritter MA, Campbell E, Faris PM, Keating EM (1989) Long-term survival analysis of the posterior cruciate condylar total knee arthroplasty. A 10-year evaluation. J Arthroplasty 4:293–296

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sprenger TR, Doerzbacher JF (2003) Tibial osteotomy for the treatment of varus gonarthrosis: survival and failure analysis to twenty-two years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:469–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Stern SH, Insall JN (1992) Posterior stabilized prosthesis: results after follow-up of nine to twelve years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:980–986

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Svard UC, Price AJ (2001) Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:191–194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. van Loon CJ, Pluk C, de Waal Malefijt MC, de Kock M, Veth RP (2001) The GSB total knee arthroplasty. A medium- and long-term follow-up and survival analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121:26–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Verhaven E, Casteleyn PP, Haentjens P, Handelberg F, De Boeck H, Van Betten F, Opdecam P (1989) Dome osteotomy of the tibia for osteoarthritis of the knee. Acta Orthop Belg 55:547–555

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Weale AE, Halabi OA, Jones PW, White SH (2001) Perceptions of outcomes after unicompartmental and total knee replacements. Clin Orthop 382:143–153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Professor L. Kaufman, Department of Medical Statistics, V.U.B. for his advice about the statistical analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vrije Universiteit Brussel—University Hospital, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium

    Peter Vorlat, Tom Van Isacker, Nicole Pouliart, Frank Handelberg & Pierre-Paul Casteleyn

  2. Orthopedisch Centrum Kortrijk, AZ Groeninge – Campus Sint Maarten, Burgemeester Vercruysselaan 5, 8500, Kortrijk, Belgium

    Guy Putzeys & Filip Gheysen

  3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Gent, Belgium

    Dominique Cottenie & René Verdonk

Authors
  1. Peter Vorlat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guy Putzeys
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dominique Cottenie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tom Van Isacker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nicole Pouliart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Frank Handelberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Pierre-Paul Casteleyn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Filip Gheysen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. René Verdonk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Vorlat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vorlat, P., Putzeys, G., Cottenie, D. et al. The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis: an independent 10-year survival analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14, 40–45 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-005-0621-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-005-0621-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation