Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Volume of activity and occupancy rate in intensive care units. Association with mortality

  • Original
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Mortality after many procedures is lower in centers where more procedures are done. It is controversial whether this is true for intensive care units, too. We examined the relationship between the volume of activity of intensive care units (ICUs) and mortality by a measure of risk-adjusted volume of activity specific for ICUs.

Design

Prospective, multicenter, observational study.

Setting

Eighty-nine ICUs in 12 European countries.

Patients

During a 4-month study period, 12,615 patients were enrolled.

Interventions

Demographic and clinical statistics, severity at admission and a score of nursing complexity and workload were collected.

Results

Total volume of activity was defined as the number of patients admitted per bed per year, high-risk volume as the number of high-risk patients admitted per bed per year (selected combining of length of stay and severity of illness). A multi-step risk-adjustment process was planned. ICU volume corresponding both to overall [odds ratio (OR) 0.966] and 3,838 high-risk (OR 0.830) patients was negatively correlated with mortality. Relative mortality decreased by 3.4 and 17.0% for every five extra patients treated per bed per year in overall volume and high-risk volume, respectively. A direct relationship was found between mortality and the ICU occupancy rate (OR 1.324 and 1.351, respectively).

Conclusions

Intensive care patients, whatever their level of risk, are best treated where more high-risk patients are treated. Moreover, the higher the ICU occupancy rate, the higher is the mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith RF, Frateschi L, Sloan EP, Campbell L, Krieg R, Edwards LC, Barrett JA (1990) The impact of volume on outcome in seriously injured trauma patients: 2 years experience of the Chicago Trauma System. J Trauma 30:1066–1075

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hosenpud JD, Breen TJ, Edwards EB, Daily OP, Hunsicker LG (1994) The effect of transplant center volume on cardiac transplant outcome: a report of the United Network for Organ Sharing registry. JAMA 271:1844–1849

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gordon TA, Burleyson GP, Tielsch JM, Cameron JL (1995) The effect of regionalisation on cost and outcome for one general high-risk surgical procedure. Ann Surg 221:43–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kazmers A, Jacobs L, Perkins A, Lindenauer SM, Bates E (1996) Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Veterans Affairs medical centers. J Vasc Surg 23:191–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Edwards EB, Roberts JP, McBride MA, Schulak JA, Hunsicker LG (1999) The effect of the volume of procedures at transplantation centers on mortality after liver transplantation. N Engl J Med 341:2049–2053

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Provonost JP, Jenckes MW, Dorman T, Garrett E, Breslow MJ, Rosenfeld BA, Lipsett PA, Bass E (1999) Organizational characteristics of Intensive Care Units related to outcomes of abdominal aortic surgery. JAMA 281:1310–1317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Thiemann DR, Coresh J, Oetgen WJ, Powe NR (1999) The association between hospital volume and survival after acute myocardial infarction in elderly patients. N Engl J Med 340:1640–1648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bach PB, Cramer LD, Schrag D, Downey RJ, Gelfand SE, Begg CB (2001) The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer. N Engl J Med 345:181–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EVA, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, Welch HG, Wenneberg DE (2002) Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 346:1128–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tilford JM, Simpson PM, Green JW, Lensing S, Fiser DH (2000) Volume-outcome relationship in pediatric intensive care units. Pediatrics 106:289–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Phibbs CS, Bronstein JM, Buxton E, Phibbs RH (1996) The effect of patient volume and level of care at the hospital of birth on neonatal mortality. JAMA 276:1054–1059

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. The UK Neonatal Staffing Study Group (2002) Patient volume, staffing, and workload in relation to risk-adjusted outcomes in a random stratified sample of UK neonatal intensive care units: a prospective evaluation. Lancet 359:99–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jones J, Rowan K (1995) Is there a relationship between the volume of work carried out in intensive care and its outcome? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 11:762–769

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sowden A, Aletras V, Place M, Rice N, Eastwood A, Grilli R, Ferguson B, Posnett J, Sheldon T (1997) Volume of clinical activity in hospitals and healthcare outcomes, costs, and patient access. Quality Health Care 6:109–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hewitt M (2000) Workshop summary. In: Interpreting the volume-outcome relationship in the context of healthy care quality. National Academy of Science, Washington, DC, pp 1–18

  16. Epstein AM (2002) Volume and outcome. It is time to move ahead. N Engl J Med 346:1161–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Miranda DR, Ryan DW, Schaufeli WB, Fidler V (1998) Organisation and management of intensive care. A prospective study in 12 European countries. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

  18. Iapichino G, Radrizzani D, Bertolini G, Ferla L, Pasetti G, Pezzi A, Porta F, Miranda DR (2001) Daily classification of the level of care. A method to describe clinical course of illness, use of resources and quality of intensive care assistance. Intensive Care Med 27:131–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European-North American multicenter study. JAMA 270:2957–2963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. J Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 84–106

  21. Cohen J, Guyatt G, Bernard GR, Calandra T, Cook D, Elbourne D, Marshall J, Nunn A, Opal S (2001) New strategies for clinical trials in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 29:880–886

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tarnow-Mordi WO, Hau C, Warden A, Shearer A (2000) Hospital mortality in relation to staff workload: a 4-year study in an adult intensive-care unit. Lancet 355:1138–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Blendon RJ, DesRoches CM, Brodie M, Benson JM, Rosen AB, Schneider E (2002) Views of practicing physicians and public on medical errors. N Engl J Med 347:1933–1940

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by the Foundation for Research on Intensive Care in Europe (FRICE) and by a grant from the Commission of the European communities (BMH1-CT93-1340). ICUs participating in EURICUS I are: Town and ICU Head Edgem, Prof. L. Boassaert; Antwerpen, Dr. J. Alexander; Antwerpen, Dr. J. Nagler; Boom, Dr. J. Steppè; Ekeren, Dr. W. Fassin; Antwerpen, Dr. R. Rutsaert; Glostrup, Dr. J. Strøm; Hillerød, Dr. H. Blom; Frederiksberg, Dr. T. Pedesen; Kuopio, Dr. M. Niskanen; Iyväskylä, Dr. K. Hersio; North Carelia, Dr. S. Karlsson; Mikkeli, Dr. M. Suistomaa; Savonlinna, Dr. M. Suvela; Paris, Dr. B. Guidet; Bry sur Marne, Dr. D. Tardy; Creteil, Prof. F. Lemaire; Creteil, Dr. L. Beydon; Paris, Dr. Y. Ravaud; Berlin, Dr. H. Wauer; Bremen, Prof. D. W. Kuckelt; Schwerin, Dr. I. Kleit; Milano, Dr. M. Langer; Monza, Dr. R. Fumagalli; Desio, Dr. S. Vesconi; Vimercate, Dr. F. Bassi; Melegnano, Dr. A. Guarino; Rho, Dr. M. Panozzo; Garbagnate, Dr. B. Allaria; Luxembourg, Dr. M. Hemmer; Utrecht, Dr. P.E. Hulstaert; Amersfoort, Dr. A.K.M. Bartelink; Emmen, Mr. A.J. Kűhne; Utrecht, H.D. Eggink; Gorichem, Dr. M.van Berkel; Amsterdam, Dr. D.F. Zandstra; Den Haag, Dr. J. de Haas; Kraków, Dr. M. Kostarczyk; Kraków, Dr. E. Bisaga; Rzeszów, Dr. T. Nowosad; Sucha Beskidzka, Dr. J. Jawor; Kraków, Dr. M. Kula; Tarnobrzeg, Dr. M. Sulik; Kraków, Dr. T. Zelazny; Kraków, Prof. J. Pach; Kraków, Dr. M. Zajac; Kraków, Dr. J. Pokorski; Porto, Dr. M. Brandão; Porto, Dr. J. Duarte; Guimarães, Dr. E. Lafuenre; Vaina do Castelo, Dr. P. Meireles; Vila Nova de Gaia, Dr. J. Reis; Barcelona, Dr. M. Guirado Alaiz; Terrassa, Dr. H. Bravo; Barcelona, Dr. M. Nolla-Salas; Terrassa, Dr. J.M. Caballero; Barcelona, Dr. J. Aguiló; Valencia, J. Cebrian Domeneck; Valencia, J. Cunat de la Hoz; Oviedo, F. Toboada; Valladolid, Dr. J. Pino Rebolledo; Granada, Dr. G. Vazquez Mata; Valencia, M. Garcia Sanz; Xátiva, Dr. M. Rodriguez Serra; Alicante, J. Cardona Peretu; Castello, Dr. R. Abizanda; Castellon, O. Aznar Orti; Elche, A. Mota Lopez; Alcoy, Dr. F. Guarajola Navarro; Sama de Langreo, J. Alfonso Magido; Ponferrada, Dr. C. Ruiz Pardo; Valencia, Dr. A. Valverde Conde; Murcia, F. Felices Abad; Granada, Dr. E. Fernandez Mondejar; Ferrol, I. Alvarez Dieguez; Santiago de Compostela, Dr. C. Galban Rodriguez; Newcastle upon Tyne, Dr. D. W. Ryan; South Shields, Dr. I.A. Andrews; Ashington, Dr. A.G. Conn; Sheffield, Dr. D. L. Edbrooke; Rotherham, Dr. D.M. Newby; Sheffield, Dr. N. Appleyard; Chesterfield, Dr. C. Cooper; Doncaster, Dr. T. Kirkpatrick. We would like to thank Dr. David Edbrooke (Intensive Care Unit, The Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK), and Dr. Elizabeth Coates (Medical Economics and Research Centre, Sheffield, UK) for their advice and help in preparing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaetano lapichino.

Appendix

Appendix

Logistic regression models analyze ICU mortality of the whole population according to total (model 1: overall patients per bed per year) and high-risk volume (model 2: high-risk patients per bed per year) of intensive care unit activity (Tables 7, 8, 9, 10).

Table 7 Model 1. Dependent variable: ICU mortality
Table 8 Model 1. Interaction terms
Table 9 Model 2. Dependent variable: ICU mortality
Table 10 Model 2. Interaction terms

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

lapichino, G., Gattinoni, L., Radrizzani, D. et al. Volume of activity and occupancy rate in intensive care units. Association with mortality. Intensive Care Med 30, 290–297 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-2113-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-2113-4

Keywords

Navigation