Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Informal coercion in psychiatry: a focus group study of attitudes and experiences of mental health professionals in ten countries

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Whilst formal coercion in psychiatry is regulated by legislation, other interventions that are often referred to as informal coercion are less regulated. It remains unclear to what extent these interventions are, and how they are used, in mental healthcare. This paper aims to identify the attitudes and experiences of mental health professionals towards the use of informal coercion across countries with differing sociocultural contexts.

Method

Focus groups with mental health professionals were conducted in ten countries with different sociocultural contexts (Canada, Chile, Croatia, Germany, Italy, Mexico, Norway, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom).

Results

Five common themes were identified: (a) a belief that informal coercion is effective; (b) an often uncomfortable feeling using it; (c) an explicit as well as (d) implicit dissonance between attitudes and practice—with wider use of informal coercion than is thought right in theory; (e) a link to principles of paternalism and responsibility versus respect for the patient’s autonomy.

Conclusions

A disapproval of informal coercion in theory is often overridden in practice. This dissonance occurs across different sociocultural contexts, tends to make professionals feel uneasy, and requires more debate and guidance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Appelbaum PS, Le Melle S (2008) Techniques used by Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) teams to encourage adherence: patient and staff perceptions. Community Ment Health J 44:459–464. doi:10.1007/s10597-008-9149-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Appelbaum PS, Redlich A (2006) Use of leverage over patients’ money to promote adherence to psychiatric treatment. J Nerv Ment Dis 194:294–302. doi:10.1097/01.nmd.0000207368.14133.0c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Beauchamp TL, Childress J (1979) Principles of biomedical ethics, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bloch S, Green SA (2006) An ethical framework for psychiatry. Br J Psychiatry 188:12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3:77–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burns T, Rugkasa J, Molodynski A, Dawson J, Yeeles K, Vazquez-Montes M, Voysey M, Sinclair J, Priebe S (2013) Community treatment orders for patients with psychosis (OCTET): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 381:1627–1633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burns T, Yeeles K, Molodynski A, Nightingale H, Vazquez-Montes M, Sheehan K, Linsell L (2011) Pressures to adhere to treatment (‘leverage’) in English mental healthcare. Br J Psychiatry 199:145–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Claassen D, Fakhoury WK, Ford R, Priebe S (2007) Money for medication: financial incentives to improve medication adherence in assertive outreach. Psychiatr Bull 31:4–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Green SA, Bloch S (2001) Working in a flawed mental health care system: an ethical challenge. Am J Psychiatry 158:1378–1383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoge SK, Lidz C, Eisenberg M, Gardner W, Monahan J, Mulvey E et al (1997) Perceptions of coercion in the admission of voluntary and involuntary psychiatric patients. Int J Law Psychiatry 20:167–181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoge SK, Lidz C, Mulvey E, Roth L, Bennett N, Siminoff L et al (1993) Patient, family, and staff perceptions of coercion in mental hospital admission: an exploratory study. Behav Sci Law 11:281–293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jaeger M, Rossler W (2010) Enhancement of outpatient treatment adherence: patients; perceptions of coercion, fairness and effectiveness. Psychiatr Res 180:48–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Katsakou C, Marougka S, Garabette J, Rost F, Yeeles K, Priebe S (2011) Why do some voluntary patients feel coerced into hospitalisation? A mixed-methods study. Psychiatr Res 187:275–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kisely SR, Campbell LA, Preston NJ (2011) Compulsory community and involuntary outpatient treatment for people with severe mental disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, Issue 3. Art No.: CD004408. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004408.pub3

  15. Kyung SM, Hyun KS, Rhee M (2013) The impact of coercion on treatment outcome: one-year follow-up survey. Int J Psychiatry Med 45:279–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lidz CW (1998) Coercion in psychiatric care: what have we learned from research? J Am ACAD Psychiatry 26:631–637

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. McNeil DE, Gormley B, Binder RL (2013) Leverage, the treatment relationship, and treatment participation. Psychiatr Serv 64:431–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mendez J (2013) Report of the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. United Nations: Human Rights Council, 22nd session. Available at http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G13/105/77/PDF/G1310577.pdf?OpenElement. Accessed 01 Aug 2014

  19. Molodynski A, Rugkåsa J, Burns T (2010) Coercion and compulsion in community mental health care. Brit Med Bull 95:105–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Monahan J, Hoge SK, Lidz C, Roth LH, Bennett N, Gardner W, Mulvey E (1995) Coercion and commitment: understanding involuntary mental hospital admission. Int J Law Pyschiat 18:249–263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Monahan J, Redlich AD, Swanson J, Robbins PC, Appelbaum PS, Petrila J, Steadman HJ, Swartz M, Angell B, McNiel DE (2005) Use of leverage to improve adherence to psychiatric treatment in the community. Psychiatr Serv 56:37–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Neale M, Rosenheck R (2000) Therapeutic limit setting in an assertive community treatment program. Psychiatr Serv 51:499–505

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. O’Brien AJ, McKenna BG, Kydd RR (2009) Compulsory community mental health treatment: literature review. Int J Nurs Stud 46:1245–1255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Okasha A (2000) The impact of Arab culture on psychiatric ethics. In: Okasha A, Arboleda-Florez J, Sartorius N (eds) Ethics, culture and psychiatry: international perspectives. American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC, pp 15–28

    Google Scholar 

  25. Okasha A (2002) The new ethical context of psychiatry. In: Sartorius N, Gaebel W, Lopez-Ibor JJ, Maj M (eds) Psychiatry in society. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, pp 101–130

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Onwuegbuzie AJ, Dickinson WB, Leech NL, Zoran AG (2009) A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research. Int J Qual Methods 8:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  27. Priebe S, Katsakou C, Glöckner M, Dembinskas A, Fiorillo A, Karastergiou A, Kiejna A, Kjellin L, Nawka P, Schuetzwohl M, Solomon Z, Torres-Gonzalez F, Wang D, Kallert T (2010) Patients’ views of involuntary hospital admission after 1 and 3 months: prospective study in 11 European countries. Br J Psychiatry 196:179–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Priebe S, Sinclair J, Burton A, Marougka S, Larsen J, Firn M, Ashcroft R (2010) Acceptability of offering financial incentives to achieve medication adherence in patients with severe mental illness: a focus group study. J Med Ethics 36:463–468

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Priebe S, Yeeles K, Bremner S, Lauber C, Eldridge S, Ashby D, David AS, O’Connell N, Forrest A, Burns T (2013) Effectiveness of financial incentives to improve adherence to maintenance treatment with antipsychotics: cluster randomised controlled trial. Br Med J 347:f5847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rugkåsa J, Canvin K, Sinclair J, Sulman A, Burns T (2014) Trust, deals and authority: community mental health professionals’ experiences of influencing reluctant patients. Community Ment Health J. doi:10.1007/s10597-014-9720-0 (Epub ahead of print 25 Mar 2014)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Spencer M, Gregoire A (2002) Specialist registrars’ views on the proposed reform of the Mental Health Act (1983): potential impact on recruitment and retention of consultant psychiatrists. Psychiat Bull 26:374–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Szmukler G, Appelbaum PS (2008) Treatment pressures, leverage, coercion, and compulsion in mental health care. J Ment Health 17:233–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Szasz T (2007) Coercion as cure: a critical history of psychiatry. Transaction Publishers, Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dunn M, Sinclair J, Canvin K, Rugkasa J, Burns T (2015) The use of leverage in community mental health care: Ethical guidance for practitioners. Int J Soc Psychiatr 60:759–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Priebe.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 14 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valenti, E., Banks, C., Calcedo-Barba, A. et al. Informal coercion in psychiatry: a focus group study of attitudes and experiences of mental health professionals in ten countries. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 50, 1297–1308 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-015-1032-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-015-1032-3

Keywords

Navigation