Skip to main content
Log in

Tolerability of Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers in Patients with Intolerance to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Between 5% and 20% of patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) develop intolerance. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs]) can be used as an alternative treatment.

Objective

In this study we aimed to evaluate the tolerability of ARBs in patients with intolerance to ACE inhibitors.

Data Sources

The electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE/EMBASE via Dialog, CENTRAL, and ISI Web of Knowledge were searched.

Study Selection

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating ARBs in patients with intolerance to ACE inhibitors were selected.

Data Synthesis

Risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated assuming the random effects method. We found 11 RCTs comparing ARBs with ACE inhibitors, diuretics, or placebo, and one RCT comparing high-dose versus low-dose ARB.

Results

ARBs had fewer cough events versus ACE inhibitors (RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.28, 0.48). ARBs had drug discontinuation (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.84, 1.17) and cough risk (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.74, 1.39) rates similar to placebo. Angioedema risk with ARBs was also similar to placebo (RR 1.62; 95% CI 0.17, 15.79). Compared with placebo, hypotension (RR 2.63; 95% CI 1.77, 3.92), renal dysfunction (RR 2.07; 95% CI 1.45, 2.95) and hyperkalemia (RR 3.37; 95% CI 1.60, 7.11) were more frequent with ARBs.

Conclusions

ACE inhibitor rechallenge should be discouraged in patients with previous intolerance to ACE inhibitors due to a higher risk of cough. ARBs had cough and angioedema incidences similar to placebo. Despite a significantly higher incidence of hypotension, renal dysfunction and hyperkalemia, discontinuation of ARBs was similar to placebo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Table I
Table II
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Table III
Table IV
Table V
Fig. 6

References

  1. Atlas SA. The renin-angiotensin aldosterone system: pathophysiological role and pharmacologic inhibition. J Manag Care Pharm 2007; 13: 9–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pitt B. RAAS inhibition/blockade in patients with cardiovascular disease: implications of recent large-scale randomised trials for clinical practice. Heart 2009; 95: 1205–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schmieder RE, Hilgers KF, Schlaich MP, et al. Renin-angiotensin system and cardiovascular risk. Lancet 2007; 369: 1208–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Israili ZH, Hall WD. Cough and angioneurotic edema associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy: a review of the literature and pathophysiology. Ann Intern Med 1992; 117: 234–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bangalore S, Kumar S, Messerli FH. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor associated cough: deceptive information from the Physicians’ Desk Reference. Am J Med 2010; 123: 1016–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Morimoto T, Gandhi TK, Fiskio JM, et al. Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced cough. J Gen Intern Med 2004; 19: 684–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Morimoto T, Gandhi TK, Fiskio JM, et al. An evaluation of risk factors for adverse drug events associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. J Eval Clin Pract 2004; 10: 499–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, et al. 2009 focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2005 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Circulation 2009; 119: e391–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pfeffer MA, McMurray JJ, Velazquez EJ, et al. Valsartan, captopril, or both in myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1893–906

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dickstein K, Kjekshus J, OPTIMAAL Steering Committee of the OPTIMAAL Study Group. Effects of losartan and captopril on mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction: the OPTIMAAL randomised trial. Optimal Trial in Myocardial Infarction with Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan. Lancet 2002; 360: 752–60

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. ONTARGET Investigators, Yusuf S, Teo KK, Pogue J, et al. Telmisartan, ramipril, or both in patients at high risk for vascular events. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1547–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Granger CB, McMurray JJ, Yusuf S, et al. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function intolerant to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Alternative trial. Lancet 2003; 362: 772–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yusuf S, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, et al., CHARM Investigators and Committees. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and preserved left-ventricular ejection fraction: the CHARM-Preserved Trial. Lancet 2003; 362: 777–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996; 17: 1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lacourcière Y, Brunner H, Irwin R, et al. Effects of modulators of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system on cough. Losartan Cough Study Group. J Hypertens 1994; 12: 1387–93

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ramsay LE, Yeo WW. ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II antagonists and cough. The Losartan Cough Study Group. J Hum Hypertens 1995; 9 Suppl. 5: S51–4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ramsay LE, Yeo WW, Losartan Cough Study Group. Double-blind comparison of losartan, lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients with a previous angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor-associated cough. J Hypertens Suppl 1995; 13: S73–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Benz J, Oshrain C, Henry D, et al. Valsartan, a new angiotensin II receptor antagonist: a double-blind study comparing the incidence of cough with lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide. J Clin Pharmacol 1997; 37: 101–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chan P, Tomlinson B, Huang TY, et al. Double-blind comparison of losartan, lisinopril, and metolazone in elderly hypertensive patients with previous angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced cough. J Clin Pharmacol 1997; 37: 253–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Paster RZ, Snavely DB, Sweet AR, et al. Use of losartan in the treatment of hypertensive patients with a history of cough induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Clin Ther 1998; 20: 978–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lacourciére Y. The incidence of cough: a comparison of lisinopril, placebo and telmisartan, a novel angiotensin II antagonist. Telmisartan Cough Study Group. Int J Clin Pract 1999; 53: 99–103

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tanser PH, Campbell LM, Carranza J, et al. Candesartan cilexetil is not associated with cough in hypertensive patients with enalapril-induced cough. Multicentre Cough Study Group. Am J Hypertens 2000; 13: 214–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rake EC, Breeze E, Fletcher AE. Quality of life and cough on antihypertensive treatment: a randomised trial of eprosartan, enalapril and placebo. J Hum Hypertens 2001; 15: 863–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Maggioni AP, Anand I, Gottlieb SO, et al., Val-HeFT Investigators (Valsartan Heart Failure Trial). Effects of valsartan on morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure not receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 1414–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Granger CB, Ertl G, Kuch J, et al. Randomized trial of candesartan cilexetil in the treatment of patients with congestive heart failure and a history of intolerance to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Am Heart J 2000; 139: 609–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Telmisartan Randomised Assessment Study in ACE iNtolerant subjects with cardiovascular Disease (TRANSCEND) Investigators, Yusuf S, Teo K, Anderson C, et al. Effects of the angiotensin-receptor blocker telmisartan on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients intolerant to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2008; 372: 1174–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Konstam MA, Neaton JD, Dickstein K, et al. Effects of high-dose versus low-dose losartan on clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure (HEAAL study): a randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet 2009; 374: 1840–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bradburn MJ, Deeks JJ, Berlin JA, et al. Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events. Stat Med 2007; 26: 53–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Heran BS, Wong MM, Heran IK, et al. Blood pressure lowering efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers for primary hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; CD003822

  30. Charlon V, Dollow S, Fidel J, et al. Reproducibility of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor induced cough: a double-blind randomised study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1995; 39: 125–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tomiyama H, Motobe K, Zaydun G, et al. Insulin sensitivity and endothelial function in hypertension: a comparison of temocapril and candesartan. Am J Hypertens 2005; 18: 178–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Campbell DJ, Krum H, Esler MD. Losartan increases bradykinin levels in hypertensive humans. Circulation 2005; 111: 315–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Grilo A, Sáez-Rosas MP, Santos-Morano J, et al. Identification of genetic factors associated with susceptibility to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors-induced cough. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2011; 21: 10–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mukae S, Itoh S, Aoki S, et al. Association of polymorphisms of the renin-angiotensin system and bradykinin B2 receptor with ACE-inhibitor-related cough. J Hum Hypertens 2002; 16: 857–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Haymore BR, Yoon J, Mikita CP, et al. Risk of angioedema with angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with prior angioedema associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a meta-analysis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2008; 101: 495–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bas M, Adams V, Suvorava T, et al. Nonallergic angioedema: role of bradykinin. Allergy 2007; 62: 842–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bas M, Greve J, Stelter K, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of icatibant in angioedema induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: a case series. Ann Emerg Med 2010; 56: 278–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Winkelmayer WC, Zhang Z, Shahinfar S, et al. Efficacy and safety of angiotensin II receptor blockade in elderly patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 2210–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Bakris GL, Weir MR. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-associated elevations in serum creatinine: is this a cause for concern? Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 685–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Matys T, Pawlak R, Kucharewicz I, et al. Hypotensive effect of angiotensin II after AT1-receptor blockade with losartan. J Physiol Pharmacol 2000; 51: 161–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Sica DA, Gehr TW, Yancy C. Hyperkalemia, congestive heart failure, and aldosterone receptor antagonism. Congest Heart Fail 2003; 9: 224–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Lakhdar R, Al-Mallah MH, Lanfear DE. Safety and tolerability of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor versus the combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Card Fail 2008; 14: 181–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Phillips CO, Kashani A, Ko DK, et al. Adverse effects of combination angiotensin II receptor blockers plus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for left ventricular dysfunction: a quantitative review of data from randomized clinical trials. Arch Intern Med 2007 1; 67: 1930–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Brown NJ, Ray WA, Snowden M, et al. Black Americans have an increased rate of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor-associated angioedema. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1996; 60: 8–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Bas M, Hoffmann TK, Tiemann B, et al. Potential genetic risk factors in angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitor-induced angio-oedema. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2010; 69: 179–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Bender R, Bunce C, Clarke M, et al. Attention should be given to multiplicity issues in systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61: 857–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly related to this review. No funding was received for the preparation of this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Caldeira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caldeira, D., David, C. & Sampaio, C. Tolerability of Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers in Patients with Intolerance to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 12, 263–277 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03261835

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03261835

Keywords

Navigation