Skip to main content
Log in

Classical conditioning and retention in normal and mutantDrosophila melanogaster

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

By changing the conditioned discrimination paradigm of Quinn et al. (1974) from an instrumental procedure to a classical (Pavlovian) one, we have demonstrated strong learning in type flies. About 150 flies were sequestered in a closed chamber and trained by explosing them sequentially to two odors in air currents. Flies received twelve electric shock pulses in the presence of the first odor (CS+) but not in the presence of the second odor (CS−). To test for conditioned avoidance responses, flies were transported to a Tmaze choice point, between converging currents of the two odors. Typically, 95% of trained flies avoided the shock-associated odor (CS+).

Acquisition of learning was a function of the number of shock pulses received during CS+ presentation and was asymptotic within one training cycle. Conditioned avoidance increased with increasing shock intensity or odor concentration and was very resistant to extinction. Learning was best when CS+ presentations overlap shock (delay conditioning) and then decreased with increasing CS-US interstimulus intervals. Shocking flies immediately before CS+ presentation (backward conditioning) produced no learning. Nonassociative control procedures (CS Alone, US Alone and Explicitly Unpaired) produced slight decreases in avoidance responses, but these affected both odors equally and did not alter our associative learning index (A).

Memory in wild-type flies decayed gradually over the first seven hours after training and still was present 24 h later. The mutantsamnesiac, rutabaga anddunce showed appreciable learning acquisition, but their memories decayed very rapidly during the first 30 min. After this, the rates of decay slowed sharply; conditioned avoidance still was measurable at least three hours after training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

OCT :

3-octanol

MCH :

4-methylcyclohexanol

C-S :

Canton-Special

CS :

conditioned stimulus

US :

unconditioned stimulus

References

  • Aceves-Pina EO, Quinn WG (1979) Learning in normal and mutantDrosophila larvae. Science 206:93–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Aceves-Pina EO, Booker R, Duerr JS, Livingstone MS, Quinn WG, Smith RF, Sziber PP, Tempel BL, Tully TP (1983) Learning and memory inDrosophila, studied with mutants. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 48:831–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Booker R, Quinn WG (1981) Conditioning of leg position in normal and mutantDrosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:3940–3944

    Google Scholar 

  • Brostrom CO, Brostrom MA, Wolff DJ (1977) Calciumdependent adenylate cyclase from rat cerebral cortex. J Biol Chem 252:5677–5685

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers D (1980) Studies on learning and cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase of thedunce mutant ofDrosophila melanogaster. Doctoral Dissertation. California Institute of Technology, Pasedina

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers D, Davis RL, Kiger JA (1981) Defect in cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase due to thedunce mutation of learning inDrosophila melanogaster. Nature 289:79–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Camardo JS, Shuster MS, Siegelbaum SA, Kandel ER (1983) Modulation of a specific K+ channel in sensory neurons ofAplysia by serotonin and cyclic AMP dependent protein phosphorylation. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 48:213–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Carew TJ, Hawkins, RD, Kandel ER (1983) Differential classical conditioning of a defensive withdrawal reflex inAplysia californica. Science 219:397–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellucci VF, Nairn AC, Greengard P, Schwartz JH, Kandel ER (1982) Inhibitor of adenosine 3′∶5-monophosphate-dependent protein kinase blocks presynaptic facilitation inAplysia. J Neurosci 2:1673

    Google Scholar 

  • Cline TW (1978) Two closely linked mutations inDrosophila melanogaster that are lethal to opposite sexes and interact with daughterless. Genetics 90:683–698

    Google Scholar 

  • DeJianne D, McGuire TR, Pruzan-Hotchkiss A (1985) Pavlovian counterconditioning of proboscis extension inDrosophila melanogaster. J Comp Psychol 99:74–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewhurst SA, Croker SG, Ikeda K, McCaman RE (1972) Metabolism of biogenic amines inDrosophila nervous tissue. Comp Biochem Physiol 438:975–981

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudai Y (1977) Properties of learning and memory inDrosophila melanogaster. J Comp Physiol 114:69–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudai Y (1979) Behavioral plasticity in aDrosophila mutant, dunceDB276. J Comp Physiol 130:271–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudai Y (1983) Mutations affect storage and use of memory differentially inDrosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:5445–5448

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudai Y (1984) A calcium-stimulated subpopulation of adenylate cyclase is a putative component of a memory apparatus inDrosophila. Neurosc Abstr 10:269

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudai Y, Bicker (1978) Comparison of visual and olfactory learning inDrosophila. Naturwissenschaften 65:494–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudai Y, Jan YN, Byers D, Quinn WG, Benzer S (1976)dunce, a mutant ofDrosophila deficient in learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 73:1684–1688

    Google Scholar 

  • Duerr JS, Quinn WG (1982) ThreeDrosophila mutations which block associative learning also affect habituation and sensitization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:3646–3650

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkers E (1982) Visual learning and memory ofDrosophila melanogaster wild-type C-S and the mutantsdunce amnesiac turnip andrutabaga. J Insect Physiol 28:535–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Gailey DA, Jackson FR, Siegel RW (1982) Male courtship inDrosophila: The conditioned response to immature males and its genetic control. Genetics 102:771–782

    Google Scholar 

  • Gailey DA, Jackson FR, Siegel RW (1984) Conditioning mutations inDrosophila melanogaster affect an experiencedependent behavioral modification in courting males. Genetics 106:613–625

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelperin A (1983) Neuroethological studies of associative learning in feeding control systems. In: Huber F, Markl H (eds) Neuroethology and behavioral physiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 189–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert RM, Sutherland NS (1969) Animal discrimination learning. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins RD, Abrams SW, Carew TJ, Kandel ER (1983) A cellular mechanism of classical conditioning inAplysia: activity-dependent enhancement of presynaptic facilitation. Science 219:400–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Horridge GA (1962) Learning of leg position by headless insects. Nature 193:697–698

    Google Scholar 

  • Jellies JA (1981) Associative olfactory conditioning inDrosophila melanogaster and memory retention through metamorphosis. Masters Thesis. Illinois State University, Normal

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel ER, Abrams T, Bernier L, Carew TJ, Hawkins RD, Schwartz JH (1983) Classical conditioning and sensitization share aspects of the same molecular cascade inAplysia. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 48:821–830

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauvar LM (1982) Defective cyclic adenosine 3′5′ monophosphate phosphodiesterase in theDrosophila memory mutantdunce. J Neurosci 3:1347–1358

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiger JA, Golanty E (1979) A genetically distinct form of cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase associated with chromomere 3D4 inDrosophila melanogaster. Genetics 91:521–535

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley DL, Grell EH (1968) Genetic variations ofDrosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Inst Washington. Publ 627

  • Livingstone MS, Tempel BL (1983) Genetic dissection of monoamine transmitter synthesis inDrosophila. Nature 303:67–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone MS, Sziber PP, Quinn WG (1984) Loss of calcium/calmodulin responsiveness in adenylate cyclase ofrutabaga, aDrosophila learning mutant. Cell 37:205–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh NJ (1974) The psychology of animal learning. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire TR (1984) Learning in three species of Diptera: the blow flyPhormia regina, the fruit flyDrosophila melanogaster and the house flyMusca domestica. Behav Genet 14:479–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Medioni J, Vaysse G (1975) Suppression conditionnelle d'un réflexe chez la Drosophile (Drosophila melanogaster): acquisition et extinction. CR Acad Sci (Paris) 169:1386–1391

    Google Scholar 

  • Menne D, Spatz HC (1977) Colour vision inDrosophila melanogaster. J Comp Physiol 114:301–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel R, Bitterman ME (1983) Learning by honeybees in an unnatural situation. In: Huber F, Markl H (eds) Neuroethology and behavioral physiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 206–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlov IP (1927) Conditioned Reflexes. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt SA, Holliday M, Drudge OW (1980) Discrimination learning of an instrumental response in individualDrosophila melanogaster. J Exp Psychol: Animal behavior processes 6:301–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn WG, Dudai Y (1976) Memory phases inDrosophila. Nature 262:576–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn WG, Harris WA, Benzer S (1974) Conditioned behavior inDrosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71:708–712

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn WG, Sziber PP, Booker R (1979) TheDrosophila memory mutantamnesiac. Nature 277:212–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescorla RA (1967) Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures. Psychol Rev 74:71–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescorla RA (1969) Pavlovian conditioned inhibition. Psychol Bull 72:77–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz JH, Bernier L, Castellucci VF, Palazzolo M, Saitoh T, Stapleton A, Kandel ER (1983) What molecular steps determine the time course of the memory for short-term sensitization inAplysia? Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 48:811–819

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel RW, Hall JC (1979) Conditioned responses in courtship behavior of normal and mutantDrosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:3430–3434

    Google Scholar 

  • Shotwell SL (1983) Cyclic adenosine 3′5′monophosphate phosphodiesterase and its role in learning inDrosophila. J Neurosci 3:739–747

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempel BL, Bonini N, Dawson DR, Quinn WG (1983) Reward learning in normal and mutantDrosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:1482–1486

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempel BL, Livingstone MS, Quinn WG (1984) Mutations in the dopa decarboxylase gene affect learning inDrosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:3577–3581

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins L, Siegel RW, Gailey DA, Hall JC (1983) Conditioned courtship inDrosophila and its mediation by association of chemical cues. Behav Genet 13:565–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Tully T (1984)Drosophila learning: behavior and biochemistry. Behav Genet 14:527–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Tully T, Zawistowski S, Hirsch J (1982) Behavior-genetic analysis ofPhormia regina: III. A phenotypic correlation between the central excitatory state (CES) and conditioning remains in replicated F2 generations of hybrid crosses. Behav Genet 12:181–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo MA (1984) The behavior-genetic analysis ofDrosophila melanogaster using the central excitatory state. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Illinois, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters ET, Byrne JH (1983) Associative conditioning of single sensory neurons suggest a cellular mechanism for learning. Science 219:405–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright TRF (1977) The genetics of dopa decarboxylase and methyl dopa sensitivity inDrosophila melanogaster. Am Zool 17:707–721

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tully, T., Quinn, W.G. Classical conditioning and retention in normal and mutantDrosophila melanogaster . J. Comp. Physiol. 157, 263–277 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01350033

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01350033

Keywords

Navigation