Abstract
Data integration of multi-platform based omics data from biospecimen holds promise of improving survival prediction and personalized therapies in cancer. Multi-omics data provide comprehensive descriptions of human genomes regulated by complex interactions of multiple biological processes such as genetic, epigenetic, and transcriptional regulation. Therefore, the integration of multi-omics data is essential to decipher complex mechanisms of human diseases and to enhance treatments based on genetic understanding of each patient in precision medicine. In this paper, we propose a gene- and pathway-based deep neural network for multi-omics data integration (MiNet) to predict cancer survival outcomes. MiNet introduces a multi-omics layer that represents multi-layered biological processes of genetic, epigenetic, and transcriptional regulation, in the gene- and pathway-based neural network. MiNet captures nonlinear effects of multi-omics data to survival outcomes via a neural network framework, while allowing one to biologically interpret the model. In the extensive experiments with multi-omics data of Gliblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients, MiNet outperformed the current cutting-edge methods including SurvivalNet and Cox-nnet. Moreover, MiNet’s model showed the capability to interpret a multi-layered biological system. A number of biological literature in GBM supported the biological interpretation of MiNet. The open-source software of MiNet in PyTorch is publicly available at https://github.com/DataX-JieHao/MiNet.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aure, M.R., et al.: Individual and combined effects of DNA methylation and copy number alterations on miRNA expression in breast tumors. Genome Biol. 14(11), R126 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-11-r126
Bleeker, F.E., et al.: Mutational profiling of kinases in glioblastoma. BMC Cancer 14(1), 718 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-718
Bruder, C.E., et al.: Phenotypically concordant and discordant monozygotic twins display different DNA copy-number-variation profiles. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 82(3), 763–771 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.12.011
Catacuzzeno, L., Franciolini, F.: Role of KCa3.1 channels in modulating Ca\(^{2+}\) oscillations during glioblastoma cell migration and invasion. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19(10), 2970 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19102970
Chaudhary, K., Poirion, O.B., Lu, L., Garmire, L.X.: Deep learning-based multi-omics integration robustly predicts survival in liver cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 24(6), 1248–1259 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0853
Chi, D.D.J., et al.: Molecular detection of tumor-associated antigens shared by human cutaneous melanomas and gliomas. Am. J. Pathol. 150(6), 2143–2152 (1997). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9176405
Ching, T., Zhu, X., Garmire, L.X.: Cox-nnet: an artificial neural network method for prognosis prediction of high-throughput omics data. PLOS Comput. Biol. 14(4), 1–18 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006076
Gründker, C., Emons, G.: The role of gonadotropin-releasing hormone in cancer cell proliferation and metastasis. Front. Endocrinol. 8, 187 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2017.00187
Hao, J., Kim, Y., Mallavarapu, T., Oh, J.H., Kang, M.: Cox-PASNet: pathway-based sparse deep neural network for survival analysis. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), pp. 381–386 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBM.2018.8621345
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Delving deep into rectifiers: surpassing human-level performance on imagenet classification. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 1026–1034 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2015.123
Higdon, R., et al.: The promise of multi-omics and clinical data integration to identify and target personalized healthcare approaches in autism spectrum disorders. OMICS: J. Integr. Biol. 19(4), 197–208 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2015.0020
Huang, S., Chaudhary, K., Garmire, L.X.: More is better: recent progress in multi-omics data integration methods. Front. Genet. 8, 84 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2017.00084
Jayaram, S., Gupta, M.K., Raju, R., Gautam, P., Sirdeshmukh, R.: Multi-omics data integration and mapping of altered kinases to pathways reveal gonadotropin hormone signaling in glioblastoma. OMICS: J. Integr. Biol. 20(12), 736–746 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2016.0142
Kang, M., et al.: Multi-block bipartite graph for integrative genomic analysis. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 14(6), 1350–1358 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCBB.2016.2591521
Kim, D., et al.: Using knowledge-driven genomic interactions for multi-omics data analysis: metadimensional models for predicting clinical outcomes in ovarian carcinoma. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 24(3), 577–587 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw165
Kristensen, V.N., et al.: Principles and methods of integrative genomic analyses in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 14, 299–313 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3721
Lyu, G., et al.: Genome and epigenome analysis of monozygotic twins discordant for congenital heart disease. BMC Genomics 19(1), 428 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4814-7
Reimand, J., et al.: Pathway enrichment analysis and visualization of omics data using g: Profiler, GSEA, Cytoscape and EnrichmentMap. Nat. Protoc. 14(2), 482–517 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-018-0103-9
Ruben, M.C.: BayesOpt: a Bayesian optimization library for nonlinear optimization, experimental design and bandits. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15, 3915–3919 (2014). http://jmlr.org/papers/v15/martinezcantin14a.html
Simon, N., Friedman, J., Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R.: Regularization paths for cox’s proportional hazards model via coordinate descent. J. Stat. Softw. 39(5), 1–13 (2011). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v039.i05
Subramanian, A., et al.: Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102(43), 15545–15550 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506580102
Ulrich, T.A., de Juan Pardo, E.M., Kumar, S.: The mechanical rigidity of the extracellular matrix regulates the structure, motility, and proliferation of glioma cells. Cancer Res. 69(10), 4167–4174 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4859
Wagner, J.R., et al.: The relationship between DNA methylation, genetic and expression inter-individual variation in untransformed human fibroblasts. Genome Biol. 15(2), R37 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r37
Yousefi, S., et al.: Predicting clinical outcomes from large scale cancer genomic profiles with deep survival models. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 11707 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11817-6
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hao, J., Masum, M., Oh, J.H., Kang, M. (2019). Gene- and Pathway-Based Deep Neural Network for Multi-omics Data Integration to Predict Cancer Survival Outcomes. In: Cai, Z., Skums, P., Li, M. (eds) Bioinformatics Research and Applications. ISBRA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11490. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20242-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20242-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-20241-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-20242-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)