Abstract
Recent technological advances have greatly diversified the platforms that are available for high-dimensional single-cell immunophenotyping, including mass cytometry, single-cell RNA sequencing, and fluorescent-based flow cytometry. The latter is currently the most commonly used approach, and modern instrumentation allows for the measurement of up to 30 parameters, revealing deep insights into the complexity of the immune system.
Here, we provide a practical guidebook for the successful design and execution of complex fluorescence-based immunophenotyping panels. We address common misconceptions and caveats, and also discuss challenges that are associated with the quality control and analysis of these data sets.
Key words
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Fulwyler MJ (1965) Electronic separation of biological cells by volume. Science 150:910–911
Robinson JP, Roederer M (2015) History of science flow cytometry strikes gold. Science 350:739–740. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad6770
Bandura DR, Baranov VI, Ornatsky OI et al (2009) Mass cytometry: technique for real time single cell multitarget immunoassay based on inductively coupled plasma time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 81:6813–6822. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac901049w
Bendall SC, Simonds EF, Qiu P et al (2011) Single-cell mass cytometry of differential immune and drug responses across a human hematopoietic continuum. Science 332:687–696. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1198704
Spitzer MH, Nolan GP (2016) Mass cytometry: single cells, many features. Cell 165:780–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.019
Tang F, Barbacioru C, Wang Y et al (2009) mRNA-Seq whole-transcriptome analysis of a single cell. Nat Methods 6:377–382. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1315
Shalek AK, Satija R, Adiconis X et al (2013) Single-cell transcriptomics reveals bimodality in expression and splicing in immune cells. Nature 498:236–240. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12172
Klein AM, Mazutis L, Akartuna I et al (2015) Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell 161:1187–1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.044
Zheng GXY, Terry JM, Belgrader P et al (2017) Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat Commun 8:14049. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14049
Brodie TM, Tosevski V (2017) High-dimensional single-cell analysis with mass cytometry. Curr Protoc Immunol 118:5.11.1–5.11.25. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpim.31
Papalexi E, Satija R (2017) Single-cell RNA sequencing to explore immune cell heterogeneity. Nat Rev Immunol 510:363. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri.2017.76
Chattopadhyay PK, Roederer M (2012) Cytometry: today’s technology and tomorrow’s horizons. Methods 57:251–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.02.009
Mair F, Prlic M (2018) OMIP-044: 28-color immunophenotyping of the human dendritic cell compartment. Cytometry A 106:255. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23331
Grégori G, Patsekin V, Rajwa B et al (2012) Hyperspectral cytometry at the single-cell level using a 32-channel photodetector. Cytometry A 81:35–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.21120
Futamura K, Sekino M, Hata A et al (2015) Novel full-spectral flow cytometry with multiple spectrally-adjacent fluorescent proteins and fluorochromes and visualization of in vivo cellular movement. Cytometry A 87:830–842. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.22725
Feher K, Volkmann von K, Kirsch J et al (2016) Multispectral flow cytometry: the consequences of increased light collection. Cytometry A 89:681–689. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.22888
Kvistborg P, Gouttefangeas C, Aghaeepour N et al (2015) Thinking outside the gate: single-cell assessments in multiple dimensions. Immunity 42:591–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2015.04.006
Saeys Y, Gassen SV, Lambrecht BN (2016) Computational flow cytometry: helping to make sense of high-dimensional immunology data. Nat Rev Immunol 16:449–462. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri.2016.56
Mair F, Hartmann FJ, Mrdjen D et al (2016) The end of gating? An introduction to automated analysis of high dimensional cytometry data. Eur J Immunol 46:34–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201545774
Chester C, Maecker HT (2015) Algorithmic tools for mining high-dimensional cytometry data. J Immunol 195:773–779. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1500633
Aghaeepour N, Finak G, FlowCAP Consortium et al (2013) Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques. Nat Methods 10:228–238. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2365
Brinkman RR, Aghaeepour N, Finak G et al (2016) Automated analysis of flow cytometry data comes of age. Cytometry A 89:13–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.22810
Cossarizza A, Chang H-D, Radbruch A et al (2017) Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies. Eur J Immunol 47:1584–1797. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201646632
Roederer M (2015) A proposal for unified flow cytometer parameter naming. Cytometry A. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.22670
Perfetto SP, Chattopadhyay PK, Wood J et al (2014) Q and B values are critical measurements required for inter-instrument standardization and development of multicolor flow cytometry staining panels. Cytometry A 85:1037–1048. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.22579
Lawrence WG, Varadi G, Entine G et al (2008) Enhanced red and near infrared detection in flow cytometry using avalanche photodiodes. Cytometry A 73:767–776. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.20595
Meinelt E, Reunanen M, Edinger M et al Standardizing application setup across multiple flow cytometers using BD FACSDiva™ Version 6 Software: technical bulletin
Perfetto SP, Ambrozak D, Nguyen R et al (2012) Quality assurance for polychromatic flow cytometry using a suite of calibration beads. Nat Protoc 7:2067–2079. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2012.126
Bagwell CB, Adams EG (1993) Fluorescence spectral overlap compensation for any number of flow cytometry parameters. Ann N Y Acad Sci 677:167–184
Roederer M (2001) Spectral compensation for flow cytometry: visualization artifacts, limitations, and caveats. Cytometry 45:194–205
Ashhurst TM, Smith AL, King NJC (2017) High-dimensional fluorescence cytometry. Curr Protoc Immunol 10:5.8.1–5.8.38. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpim.37
Nguyen R, Perfetto S, Mahnke YD et al (2013) Quantifying spillover spreading for comparing instrument performance and aiding in multicolor panel design. Cytometry A 83:306–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.22251
Roederer M, Tárnok A (2010) OMIPs—orchestrating multiplexity in polychromatic science. Cytometry A 77:811–812. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.20959
Mahnke Y, Chattopadhyay P, Roederer M (2010) Publication of optimized multicolor immunofluorescence panels. Cytometry A 77:814–818. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.20916
Liechti T, Günthard HF, Trkola A (2018) OMIP-047: high-dimensional phenotypic characterization of B cells. Cytometry A 103:2262–2596. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23488
Moncunill G, Han H, Dobaño C et al (2014) OMIP-024: pan-leukocyte immunophenotypic characterization of PBMC subsets in human samples. Cytometry A 85:995–998. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.22580
Hulspas R (2010) Titration of fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies for labeling cell surface markers on live cells. Curr Protoc Cytom Chapter 6:Unit 6.29–6.29.9. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142956.cy0629s54
Perfetto SP, Chattopadhyay PK, Roederer M (2004) Seventeen-colour flow cytometry: unravelling the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 4:648–655. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri1416
Mahnke YD, Roederer M (2007) Optimizing a multicolor immunophenotyping assay. Clin Lab Med 27:469–485. v. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cll.2007.05.002
Parks DR, Roederer M, Moore WA (2006) A new “Logicle” display method avoids deceptive effects of logarithmic scaling for low signals and compensated data. Cytometry A 69:541–551. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.20258
Trotter J (2007) Alternatives to log-scale data display. Curr Protoc Cytom Chapter 10:Unit 10.16–10.16.11. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142956.cy1016s42
Herzenberg LA, Tung J, Moore WA et al (2006) Interpreting flow cytometry data: a guide for the perplexed. Nat Immunol 7:681–685. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni0706-681
Roederer M (2016) Distributions of autofluorescence after compensation: be panglossian, fret not. Cytometry A 89:398–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.22820
Andersen MN, Al-Karradi SNH, Kragstrup TW, Hokland M (2016) Elimination of erroneous results in flow cytometry caused by antibody binding to Fc receptors on human monocytes and macrophages. Cytometry A 89:1001–1009. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.22995
Chattopadhyay PK, Gaylord B, Palmer A et al (2012) Brilliant violet fluorophores: a new class of ultrabright fluorescent compounds for immunofluorescence experiments. Cytometry A 81A:456–466. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.22043
Acknowledgments
The authors thank all members of the Prlic lab and Dr. Sabine Spath for critical reading of the manuscript. F.M. and A.J.T. are supported by a Marylou scholarship from the International Society for Advancement of Cytometry (ISAC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Mair, F., Tyznik, A.J. (2019). High-Dimensional Immunophenotyping with Fluorescence-Based Cytometry: A Practical Guidebook. In: McCoy, Jr, J. (eds) Immunophenotyping. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2032. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9650-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9650-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-9649-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-9650-6
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols