PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Alexandra L. J. Freeman AU - John Kerr AU - Gabriel Recchia AU - Claudia R. Schneider AU - Alice C.E. Lawrence AU - Leila Finikarides AU - Giulia Luoni AU - Sarah Dryhurst AU - David J Spiegelhalter TI - Communicating personalised risks from COVID-19: guidelines from an empirical study AID - 10.1101/2020.10.05.20206961 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.10.05.20206961 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/06/2020.10.05.20206961.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/06/2020.10.05.20206961.full AB - As increasing amounts of data accumulate on the effects of the novel coronavirus Sars-CoV-2 and the risk factors that lead to poor outcomes, it is possible to produce personalised estimates of the risks faced by groups of people with different characteristics. The challenge of how to communicate these then becomes apparent. Based on empirical work (total n=5,520, UK) supported by in-person interviews with public and physicians, we make recommendations on the presentation of such information. These include: using predominantly percentages when communicating the absolute risk, but also providing (for balance) a format which conveys a higher perception of risk (expected frequency out of 10,000); using a visual linear scale cut at an appropriate point to illustrate the maximum risk, explained through an illustrative ‘persona’ who might face that highest level of risk; and providing context to the absolute risk through presenting a range of other ‘personas’ illustrating people who would face risks of a wide range of different levels. These ‘personas’ should have their major risk factors (age, existing health conditions) described. By contrast, giving people absolute likelihoods of other risks they face in an attempt to add context was considered less helpful.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was funded by the Winton Centre for Risk & Evidence Communication at the University of Cambridge, which is financed by a donation from the David & Claudia Harding Foundation.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Psychological Research Ethics Committee at the University of Cambridge (PRE.2020.070).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe questionnaires and data for the surveys is available at: https://osf.io/auf8h/ https://osf.io/auf8h/