TY - JOUR T1 - Pre-school childcare and inequalities in child development JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.10.05.20206946 SP - 2020.10.05.20206946 AU - Michael J Green AU - Anna Pearce AU - Alison Parkes AU - Elaine Robertson AU - S Vittal Katikireddi Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/06/2020.10.05.20206946.abstract N2 - Centre-based childcare may benefit pre-school children and alleviate inequalities in early childhood development, but evidence on socio-emotional and physical health outcomes is limited. Data were from the UK Millennium Cohort Study (n=14,376). Inverse-probability weighting was used to estimate confounder-adjusted population-average effects of centre and non-centre-based childcare (compared to parental care only) between ages 26-31 months on (age 3): internalising and externalising symptoms, pro-social behaviour, independence, emotional dysregulation, vocabulary, school readiness, and body mass index. To assess impacts on inequalities, controlled direct effects of low parental education and lone parenthood on all outcomes were estimated under two hypothetical scenarios: 1) universal take-up of centre-based childcare; and 2) parental care only. On average, non-centre based childcare improved vocabulary and centre-based care improved school readiness, with little evidence of other benefits. However, socio-economic inequalities were observed for all outcomes and were attenuated in scenario 1 (universal take-up). For example, inequalities in externalising symptoms (according to low parental education) were reduced from a confounder-adjusted standard deviation difference of 7.8 (95% confidence intervals: 6.7, 8.8), to 1.7 (0.6, 2.7). Inequalities by parental education in scenario 2 (parental care only) were wider than in scenario 1 for externalising symptoms (at 3.4 (2.4, 4.4)), and for emotional dysregulation and school readiness. Inequalities by lone parenthood, which were smaller, fell in scenario 1, and fell further in scenario 2. Universal access to centre-based pre-school care may alleviate inequalities, while restricted access (e.g. during lockdown for a pandemic such as Covid-19) may widen some inequalities in socioemotional and cognitive development.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12017/11, MC_UU_12017/13) and the Scottish Government Chief Scientist Office (SPHSU11, SPHSU13). Anna Pearce was additionally supported by the Wellcome Trust (205412/Z/16/Z) and S Vittal Katikireddi had support from a National Health Service Research Scotland Senior Clinical Fellowship (SCAF/15/02).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Each wave of the Millennium Cohort Study has had ethical approval from a National Health Service Research Ethics Committee.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are available from the UK Data Service. https://beta.ukdataservice.ac.uk/datacatalogue/series/series?id=2000031 ER -