RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Using a crowdsourcing open call, hackathon and a modified Delphi method to develop a consensus statement and sexual health survey instrument
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.10.02.20205542
DO 10.1101/2020.10.02.20205542
A1 Kpokiri, Eneyi E.
A1 Wu, Dan
A1 Srinivas, Megan L.
A1 Anderson, Juliana
A1 Say, Lale
A1 Kontula, Osmo
A1 Ahmad, Noor Ani
A1 Morroni, Chelsea
A1 Izugbara, Chimaraoke
A1 de Visser, Richard
A1 Yaa-Oduro, Georgina
A1 Gitau, Evelyn
A1 Welbourn, Alice
A1 Andrasik, Michele
A1 Norman, Wendy V.
A1 Clifton, Soazig
A1 Gabster, Amanda
A1 Gesselman, Amanda
A1 Smith, Chantal
A1 Prause, Nicole
A1 Olumide, Adesola
A1 Erausquin, Jennifer T.
A1 Muriuki, Peter
A1 van der Straten, Ariane
A1 Nicholson, Martha
A1 O’Connell, Kathryn A.
A1 Mwoka, Meggie
A1 Bajos, Nathalie
A1 Mercer, Catherine H
A1 Gonsalves, Lianne Marie
A1 Tucker, Joseph D.
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/05/2020.10.02.20205542.abstract
AB Population health surveys are rarely comprehensive in addressing sexual health, and population-representative surveys often lack standardized measures for collecting comparable data across countries. We present a sexual health survey instrument and implementation considerations for population-level sexual health research. The brief, comprehensive sexual health survey and consensus statement was developed via a multi-step process (an open call, a hackathon, and a modified Delphi process). The survey items, domains, entire instruments, and implementation considerations to develop a sexual health survey were solicited via a global crowdsourcing open call. The open call received 175 contributions from 49 countries. Following review of submissions from the open call, 18 finalists and eight facilitators with expertise in sexual health research, especially in low and middle-income countries (LMICs), were invited to a 3-day hackathon to harmonize a survey instrument. Consensus was achieved through an iterative, modified Delphi process that included three rounds of online surveys. The entire process resulted in a 19-item consensus statement and a 10-minute sexual health survey instrument. This is the first global consensus on a sexual and reproductive health survey instrument that can be used to generate cross-national comparative data in both high-income and LMICs. The inclusive process identified priority domains for improvement and can inform the design of sexual and reproductive health programs and contextually relevant data for comparable research across countries.Key points– National population-representative surveys assessing sexual practices, behaviours and health-related outcomes focus on high-income countries and different sexual health measures are often used.– There is a lack of population-level representative sexual health research in low- and middle-income countries.– Existing comparable data on sexual practices and behaviours across countries are limited due to the absence of a standardized global sexual health survey instrument.– We report the global consensus on a set of core sexual health items within a 10-minute survey instrument that accommodates the needs and priorities of people from LMICs and various legal and cultural contexts across countries.– The consensus process breaks new ground in terms of incorporating feedback from diverse individuals using a crowdsourcing open call and hackathon process.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFinancial support for this study was provided by the UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, and the Academy of Medical Sciences and the Newton Fund (Grant number NIF\R1\181020). The funders played no role in the study design, data collection, interpretation of data, the writing of the report, or in the decision to submit the article for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Not applicable.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data referred to in the manuscript is included in supplementary materials.