@article {Liu2020.10.01.20205302, author = {Laura Liu and Zahra Goodarzi and Aaron Jones and Ron Posno and Sharon Straus and Jennifer Watt}, title = {Factors associated with access to virtual care in older adults: A cross-sectional study}, elocation-id = {2020.10.01.20205302}, year = {2020}, doi = {10.1101/2020.10.01.20205302}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press}, abstract = {Background During the COVID-19 pandemic, virtual care (i.e. telephone or videoconference) has played a critical role. However, concerns were raised regarding equitable access for older adults, in particular, given potential advantages of videoconference-as opposed to telephone-based assessment. Our objective was to describe patient-specific factors associated with different modes of virtual healthcare.Methods We reviewed medical records of all patients assessed virtually in the geriatric medicine clinic at St. Michael{\textquoteright}s Hospital, Toronto, Canada, between March 17 and July 13, 2020. We derived adjusted odds ratios (OR), risk differences (RD), and marginal and predicted probabilities, with 95\% confidence intervals, from a multivariable logistic regression model, which tested the association between having a videoconference assessment (vs. a telephone assessment) and patient age, sex, ability to use a computer, education, frailty (measured on the Clinical Frailty Scale), history of cognitive impairment, and immigration history; language of assessment, and caregiver involvement in assessment.Results Our study included 330 patients (227 telephone and 103 videoconference assessments). Frailty (adjusted OR 0.62, 0.45 to 0.85; adjusted RD -0.08, -0.09 to -0.06) and absence of a caregiver (adjusted OR 0.12, 0.06 to 0.24; adjusted RD -0.35, -0.43 to -0.26) were associated with lower odds of videoconference assessment. For example, an 80-year-old woman with mild frailty who immigrated to Canada, speaks English, attained a post-secondary education, does not have cognitive impairment, and uses a computer had a 60\% (39\% to 80\%) predicted probability of videoconference assessment if a caregiver was present compared to 15\% (3\% to 26\%) without a caregiver. Only 32 of 98 (32.7\%) patients who could independently use a computer participated in videoconference assessments.Conclusion Given the recent expansion of virtual care, we must urgently implement and evaluate strategies that optimise equitable access to videoconference-based virtual care for older adults.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was not funded.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:We obtained ethics approval for this study from the Unity Health Toronto Research Ethics Board.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesInterested researchers should contact the corresponding author for further information.}, URL = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/04/2020.10.01.20205302}, eprint = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/04/2020.10.01.20205302.full.pdf}, journal = {medRxiv} }