PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Moosaie, Fatemeh AU - Fatemi Abhari, Seyede Marzie AU - Deravi, Niloofar AU - Behnagh, Arman Karimi AU - Esteghamati, Sadaf AU - Firouzabadi, Fatemeh Dehghani AU - Rabizadeh, Soghra AU - Nakhjavani, Manouchehr AU - Esteghamati, Alireza TI - Waist-to-height ratio is a more accurate screening tool for hypertension than waist-to-hip circumference and BMI in type 2 diabetes: A prospective study AID - 10.1101/2020.09.29.20203752 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.09.29.20203752 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/29/2020.09.29.20203752.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/29/2020.09.29.20203752.full AB - Background To date, anthropometric measures (i.e. body mass index (BMI), waist to hip ratio (WHR) and waist to height ratio (WHtR) have shown to be associated with prediction of incident hypertension. However, the difference in accuracy of these measures has been of controversy. We aimed to determine whether WHtR is a more accurate tool for HTN than WHR and BMI in patients with type 2 diabetes.Material and Methods The study population consisted of 1685 normotensive patients with T2DM. They were followed up for hypertension incidence for a mean of 4.8 years from April 2002 to January 2020. Cox regression was performed to assess the association between anthropometric measures (i.e., BMI, WHR, and WHtR) and incident hypertension during the follow-up period. Area under the ROC curve analysis was performed and optimal cutoff values were calculated using Youden index.Results WHtR and BMI were significantly associated with an increased risk of hypertension (HR=3.296(0.936-12.857), P < 0.001 and HR:1.050 (1.030-1.070), P < 0.001, respectively). The discriminative powers of each anthropometric index for HTN were 0.571 (0.540–0.602) for BMI, 0.518 (0.486–0.550) for WHR, and 0.609 (0.578–0.639) for WHtR. The optimal cutoff points for predicting HTN in patients with T2DM were 26.94 (sensitivity=0.739, specificity=0.380) for BMI, 0.90 (sensitivity=0.718, specificity=0.279) for WHR and 0.59 (sensitivity=0.676, specificity=0.517) for WHtR.Conclusion In the current study WHtR was a more accurate screening tool for HTN compared to WHR and BMI in patients with type 2 diabetes.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The ethics committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences approved the study. The study complied with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data could be provided by request.