RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Factor Structure, Reliability and Validity of the Institutional Culture Assessment Scale (ICAS) JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2020.09.28.20203331 DO 10.1101/2020.09.28.20203331 A1 Gabriela Massaro Carneiro Monteiro A1 Carolina Meira Moser A1 Luciana Terra de Oliveira A1 Glen Owens Gabbard A1 Pricilla Braga Laskoski A1 Simone Hauck YR 2020 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/29/2020.09.28.20203331.abstract AB Introduction Work environment can affect the employees, fostering well-being versus emotional burden. The aim of this study was to develop the Institutional Culture Assessment Scale (ICAS), and evaluate its Factor Structure, Reliability and Validity in a Brazilian sample of medical students and physicians in different settings and phases of the medical career.Method 2,537 individuals were evaluated by an online questionnaire. The sample was split in half for independent testing of Exploratory Factor Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. We then used Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to test the best solutions in the second half of the sample. Then, considering a unidimensional model solution, an item response theory (IRT) analysis was conducted. Simple linear regression analysis was performed to investigate associations between ICAS factor scores and internal validators (burnout scores), using again the second half of the sample.Result Parallel analysis revealed two factors. The first factor encompassed items involving the institution and supervisors. The second factor encompassed items involving peers. We decided to performed the next analysis with a unidimensional construct based solely on institution/supervisor items. A unidimensional model including the remaining seven items from the ICAS instrument revealed an excellent fit with the data. All items loaded significantly on the unidimensional latent trait with factor loadings ranging from 0.583 to 0.869. McDonald’s Omega was 0.89, showing a high internal consistency.Conclusion This study presents a valid and reliable scale to assess aspects of institutional culture connected to the relationships with superiors/supervisors and to the relation to the institutions themselves.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding/support: None.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre (Porto Alegre, Brazil) (protocol 70231617.6.0000.5327).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.