PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Stewart, Robert AU - Martin, Evangelia AU - Bakolis, Ioannis AU - Broadbent, Matthew AU - Byrne, Nicola AU - Landau, Sabine TI - Comparison of mental health service activity before and shortly after UK social distancing responses to the COVID-19 pandemic: February-March 2020 AID - 10.1101/2020.09.26.20202150 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.09.26.20202150 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/28/2020.09.26.20202150.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/28/2020.09.26.20202150.full AB - This study sought to provide an early description of mental health service activity before and after national implementation of social distancing for COVID-19. A time series analysis was carried out of daily service-level activity on data from a large mental healthcare provider in southeast London, from 01.02.2020 to 31.03.2020, comparing activity before and after 16.03.2020: i) inpatient admissions, discharges and numbers, ii) contact numbers and daily caseloads (Liaison, Home Treatment Teams, Community Mental Health Teams); iii) numbers of deaths for past and present patients. Daily face-to-face contact numbers fell for liaison, home treatment and community services with incomplete compensatory rises in non-face-to-face contacts. Daily caseloads fell for all services, apart from working age and child/adolescent community teams. Inpatient numbers fell 13.6% after 16th March, and daily numbers of deaths increased by 61.8%.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe research leading to these results has received support from the Medical Research Council Mental Health Data Pathfinder Award to Kings College London, and a grant from Kings Together. EM is supported by the ESRC-funded DETERMIND project. The CRIS data resource, and RS, IB, MB and SL are part-funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Kings College London. SL and IB are also supported by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South London (NIHR ARC South London) at Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. The views expressed are those of the author[s] and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:CRIS has received approval as a data source for secondary analyses (Oxford Research Ethics Committee C, reference 18/SC/0372)All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are available on request from the corresponding author.