RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 The effect of mobile applications for menstrual cycle or fertility trackers on women’s health: protocol for a systematic review JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2020.09.25.20201251 DO 10.1101/2020.09.25.20201251 A1 Andrea I. Nomura-Sakata A1 Cinthya I. Mogrovejo-Navas A1 Alejandra Navarro-Grau A1 Jessica Hanae Zafra-Tanaka YR 2020 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/27/2020.09.25.20201251.abstract AB Background Nowadays the use of smartphones and the development of health-related mobile applications has increased worldwide. Menstrual cycle tracking applications (MCTAs) have become especially popular among women because of their practicality in recording menstrual cycles, characteristics of bleeding and prediction of cycle stages. There are various studies regarding the use of MCTAs for different aspects of women’s health such as estimating a fertility window for both conception and contraception, help register last menstrual period for calculation of gestational age, record pre-menstrual symptoms, among others. However, effects of MCTAs have not been analyzed in a systematic review.Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of mobile applications for menstrual cycle or fertility trackers on women’s health.Methods A systematic review will be conducted, starting with a search in PubMed, CENTRAL and Scopus using search terms related to mobile applications and menstrual or fertility tracking. Only randomized controlled trials will be screened with a sample of child-bearing aged women that use menstrual or fertility tracking mobile applications. Selected studies will be fully analyzed and the results will be recorded on a spread sheet. Study selection and data extraction will be conducted by two reviewers independently and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for RCT will be used for assessment of risk of bias. Discrepancies will be reviewed with a third reviewer.Conclusion Currently, there is a lack of information on the effects of using MCTAs on women’s health. This systematic review aims to provide an analysis on the outcomes of the usage of these applications and evaluate any potential effects.Conflicts of interest All authors declare to have no conflicts of interest.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding provided for this studyAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This is a systematic review protocol and no human subjects were involved in this project. Therefore, this study was classified as non-human subject research and no approval was needed from an IRB/ethics committeeAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll relevant information will be published as supplementary materials