RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials on the Effectiveness of Ecotherapy Interventions for Treating Mental Disorders JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2020.09.25.20201525 DO 10.1101/2020.09.25.20201525 A1 T. Williams A1 G.C. Barnwell A1 D.J. Stein YR 2020 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/27/2020.09.25.20201525.abstract AB Background Systematic reviews on ecotherapy interventions (i.e. environmental therapies and animal-assisted therapies) in the general population have demonstrated promising findings. However, there is a need for systematic assessment of the evidence for the use of these interventions in people living with mental disorders. Hence, we conducted a systematic review of randomised control trials (RCTs) on exposure to ecotherapy interventions (i.e. environmental therapy, animal-assisted therapy, wilderness therapy) for individuals with mental disorders.Methods The search was completed in September 2019 and comprised: Science Direct, PubMed Central, EBSCOHOST (via Academic Search Premier), the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. The primary outcomes that were assessed include: treatment efficacy (on the CGI-I or similar), symptom severity, and/or dropout rates. Secondary outcome measures assessed included self-efficacy, perceived control, hope, quality of life, life skills, and coping.Results A total of 2415 reports were identified, of which 94 were assessed for eligibility. Eight environmental therapy trials (i.e. gardening, forest therapy, horticultural therapy, nature adventure rehabilitation, and adventure-based therapy) and ten animal-assisted therapy trials (i.e. dogs, horses or dolphins) were included in the review. Risk of bias assessment was conducted, and qualitative analysis performed to describe the efficacy of the RCTs. The findings suggest that environmental therapies or animal-assisted therapies are efficacious in reducing symptoms of anxiety, depressive, substance-related and addictive, schizophrenia-spectrum and trauma- and stress-related disorders.Conclusion There is suggestive, but not conclusive, evidence for the efficacy of some ecotherapy interventions in mental disorders. In particular, there are: four environmental therapy trials and five animal-assisted therapy trails for depression and/or anxiety; one environmental therapy trial for post-traumatic stress disorder; three environmental therapy and animal assisted therapy trials for general psychiatric disorders; one environmental therapy trial and two animal assisted therapy trials for substance use disorders; and, one environmental therapy and two animal-assisted trials for people living with schizophrenia spectrum disorder. The use of standard reporting guidelines may improve evidence quality of future ecotherapy RCTs, and provide a foundation meta-analysis of the evidence.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was registered with PROSPERO, international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42019130944). Garret Barnwell received funding from the South Afri-can Medical Research Council (SAMRC) through its Division of Research Capacity Develop-ment under the National Health Scholarship Programme from funding received from the Public Health Enhancement Fund/South African National Department of Health. The con-tent hereof is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the SAMRC. Dan Stein has received research grants and/or consultancy honoraria from Lundbeck and Sun.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Not applicableAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesIncluded in content of tables