RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 An expert judgment model to predict early stages of the COVID-19 outbreak in the United States JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2020.09.21.20196725 DO 10.1101/2020.09.21.20196725 A1 Thomas McAndrew A1 Nicholas G. Reich YR 2020 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/23/2020.09.21.20196725.abstract AB During early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, forecasts provided actionable information about disease transmission to public health decision-makers. Between February and May 2020, experts in infectious disease modeling made weekly predictions about the impact of the pandemic in the U.S. We aggregated these predictions into consensus predictions. In March and April 2020, experts predicted that the number of COVID-19 related deaths in the U.S. by the end of 2020 would be in the range of 150,000 to 250,000, with scenarios of near 1m deaths considered plausible. The wide range of possible future outcomes underscored the uncertainty surrounding the outbreak’s trajectory. Experts’ predictions of measurable short-term outcomes had varying levels of accuracy over the surveys but showed appropriate levels of uncertainty when aggregated. An expert consensus model can provide important insight early on in an emerging global catastrophe.One Sentence Summary Expert predictions provided valuable insight of future societal burden during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in the US.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work has been supported by the National Institutes of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS, grant number R35GM119582) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, grant number 1U01IP001122). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of CDC, NIGMS or the National Institutes of Health.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The University of Massachusetts at Amherst Human Research Protection Office determined that this research was Not Human Subjects research, stating "The proposed project does not involve intervention or interaction with individuals OR does not use identifiable private information [45 CFR 46.102(f)(1),(2)]."All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData is available at https://github.com/tomcm39/COVID19_expert_survey