RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Supporting decision-making on allocation of ICU beds and ventilators in pandemics
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.09.20.20198184
DO 10.1101/2020.09.20.20198184
A1 Magnolia Cardona
A1 Claudia C. Dobler
A1 Eyza Koreshe
A1 Daren K Heyland
A1 Rebecca Nguyen
A1 Joan P.Y. Sim
A1 Justin Clark
A1 Alex Psirides
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/23/2020.09.20.20198184.abstract
AB As the world struggles with the COVID-19 pandemic, health service demands have increased to a point where healthcare resources may prove inadequate to meet demand. Guidelines and tools on how to best allocate intensive care beds and ventilators developed during previous epidemics can assist clinicians and policy-makers to make consistent, objective and ethically sounds decisions about resource allocation when healthcare rationing is inevitable. This scoping review of 62 published guidelines, triage protocols, consensus statements and prognostic tools from crisis and non-crisis situations sought to identify a multiplicity of objective factors to inform healthcare rationing of critical care and ventilator care. It also took ethical considerations into account. Prognostic indicators and other decision tools presented here can be combined to create locally-relevant triage algorithms for clinical services and policy makers deciding about allocation of ICU beds and ventilators during a pandemic. Community awareness of the triage protocol is recommended to build trust and alleviate anxiety among the public. This review provides a unique resource and is intended as a discussion starter for clinical services and policy makers to consider formalising an objective triage consensus document that fits the local context.Take-home message An evidence-based catalogue of objective variables from 62 published resources tested in crisis and non-crisis situations can help clinicians make locally relevant triage decisions on ICU and ventilator allocation in inevitable COVID-19 health rationing.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding was available for this workAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:N/A - Scoping reviewAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data available is reported in tables or text. Any requests can be addressed to the corresponding author