TY - JOUR T1 - A Brief Burnout Evaluation Scale (BBES) as a potential tool to prevent collapse of the health care task force during the COVID-19 pandemic JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.09.21.20198804 SP - 2020.09.21.20198804 AU - Tamires Martins Bastos AU - Gabriela Massaro Carneiro Monteiro AU - Rogério Boff Borges AU - Carolina Meira Moser AU - Daniel Luccas Arenas AU - Ana Margareth Bassols AU - Pricilla Braga Laskoski AU - Simone Hauck Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/23/2020.09.21.20198804.abstract N2 - Introduction In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, where overloaded health systems seem inevitable, there is a need for reliable, conceptually adequate, and easily applied measurement tools to identify health professionals at risk.Objective to present the preliminary psychometric properties of a Brief Burnout Evaluation Scale (BBES) and its association with important outcomes, i.e., moderate to severe depression and suicidal ideation.Methods The BBES has 4 Likert-type items and was tested as part of a cross-sectional study that included 401 medical students. Reliability analysis and validity studies were performed.Results In the parallel analysis, two factors were extracted, explaining 84.4% of the variance. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.78, showing high internal consistency. Considering a cut-off point of 12, the odds ratio for moderate to severe depression was 3.01 (CI 1.7-5.22; p<0.001) and for last month suicidal ideation 2.96 (CI 1.6-5.48).Conclusion The results suggest good psychometric characteristics for the BBES, thus reinforcing its utility as an assessment tool for evaluating the well-being or distress of health professionals. It carries with it the potential to implement early interventions and to prevent the descent into burnout so common today in the health care task force during the pandemic.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialOnline survey with no intervention on participants.Funding StatementPublic Funding (research grants): Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de iSuperior (CAPES). https://www.capes.gov.br/Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The studies was approved by the ethics committee of the Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre (CAAE 70231617600005327 and 85311418800005327).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesUnpublished data. The 4 items of BBES were developed from an online survey that evaluated 2537 Brazilian medical students and doctors in October 2019, through the MBI (submitted manuscript). ER -