PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Colin Deschanvres
AU  - Thomas Haudebourg
AU  - Nathan Peiffer-Smadja
AU  - Karine Blanckaert
AU  - David Boutoille
AU  - Jean-Christophe Lucet
AU  - Gabriel Birgand
TI  - How do the general population behave with facemasks to prevent COVID-19 in the community?
AID  - 10.1101/2020.09.18.20195669
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.09.18.20195669
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/18/2020.09.18.20195669.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/18/2020.09.18.20195669.full
AB  - IMPORTANCE The appropriate use of facemasks, recommended or mandated by authorities, is critical to protect the community and prevent the spread of COVID-19.OBJECTIVE To evaluate the frequency and quality of facemask use in general populations of different socio-spatial backgrounds.DESIGN A multi-site observational study carried out from 25 June 2020 to 21 July 2020.SETTING The observations were carried out in 43 different locations in a region in the west of France, representing various areas: rural and urban, indoor and outdoor, and in areas where masks were mandated or not. An observer was positioned at a predetermined place, facing a landmark, and collected information about the use of facemasks and socio-demographic data.PARTICIPANTS All individual passing between the observer and the landmark were included.EXPOSURE The observer collected information on whether a mask was worn, the type of mask used, the quality of the positioning, gender, and the age category of each individual.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcomes were the use of a facemask and the quality of the positioning. Factors associated with these outcomes were identified.RESULTS A total of 3354 observations were recorded. A facemask was worn by 56.4% (n=1892) of individuals, varying from 49% (n=1359) in non-mandatory areas and 91.7% (n=533) in mandatory areas, including surgical facemasks (56.8%, n=1075) and cloth masks (43.2%, n=817). The facemask was correctly positioned in 75.2% (n=1422) of cases. The factors independently associated with wearing a facemask were being indoors (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.44), being in a mandatory area (aOR, 0.14; 95%CI, 0.10-0.20), female gender (aOR, 0.57; 95%CI, 0.49-0.66), and age >40 years (aOR, 0.54; 95%CI, 0.46-0.63). The factors independently associated with correct mask position were rural location (aOR, 0.76; 95%CI, 0.97-0.98), being in an indoor area (aOR, 0.49; 95%CI, 0.38-0.65), use of a cloth mask (aOR, 0.65; 95%CI, 0.52-0.81), and age >40 years (aOR, 0.61; 95%CI 0.49-0.76).CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Information campaigns should promote the use of cloth masks. Young people in general and men in particular are the priority targets. Simplifying the rules to require universal mandatory masking seems to be the best approach for health authorities.Question What is the frequency and quality, and their associated factors, of the use of facemasks in general populations of different socio-spatial backgrounds?Findings Among 3354 observations, 56.4% of individuals wore a facemask, either a surgical mask (56.8%) or a cloth mask (43.2%), and the mask was correctly positioned in 75.2% of cases. Correct use of facemasks was more common in rural and indoors areas, individuals wearing cloth masks, and among those aged >40 years.Meaning Health authorities should promote the use of cloth masks, engage young people in this process, and consider the mandatory universal masking.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study was funded by Agence Regionale de Sante (ARS) of Pays de la Loire. Gabriel Birgand (GB) was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College London in partnership with Public Health England (PHE). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, the Department of Health or PHE. GB has received an Early Career Research Fellowship from the Antimicrobial Research Collaborative at Imperial College London and acknowledges the support of the Welcome trust. RA is supported by a NIHR Fellowship in knowledge mobilization. The support of ESRC as part of the Antimicrobial Cross Council initiative supported by the seven UK research councils and the support of the Global Challenges Research Fund are gratefully acknowledged.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Not applicableAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data will be available to those who make the request.