TY - JOUR T1 - An Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the APS-POQ-R in Acute Pain Presenting to the Emergency Department JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.09.15.20194738 SP - 2020.09.15.20194738 AU - James A Hughes AU - Lee Jones AU - Joseph Potter AU - Alixandra Wong AU - Nathan J Brown AU - Kevin Chu Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/18/2020.09.15.20194738.abstract N2 - Background Pain is a common presenting complaint to the emergency department (ED), yet is often undertreated. When assessing the outcomes of pain care in the ED, process measures are commonly reported. Attempts to measure patient-reported outcomes existing in current ED literature. However, they are frequently unvalidated and lack standardization. The American Pain Societies – Patient Outcome Questionnaire-Revised edition (APS-POQ-R) has been identified as the most likely, pre-existing tool to be useful in the acute pain in the ED. However, this requires feasibility and construct validation before use.Objective To assess the feasibility and construct validity of the APS-POQ-R in patients presenting to the adult emergency department with acute pain.Methods This study is an initial psychometric evaluation of the constructs contained within the APS-POQ-R in adult patients presenting with moderate to severe acute pain to a large urban ED. The study is guided by the methods described in the initial development of the instrument.Results Two hundred adult patients were recruited and completed the APS-POQ-R. The APS-POQ-R demonstrated content validity in patients presenting with acute pain. Exploratory factor analysis demonstrated five subgroups. The tool demonstrated discriminatory ability based on patient urgency, and subscale measurement was associated with patient satisfaction with care.Conclusions The APS-POQ-R has demonstrable construct validity in adult patients presenting with acute pain to the ED. Further psychometric analysis across multiple EDs is required before the APS-POQ-R can be recommended as a validated PROM for ED patients in pain.Competing Interest StatementThis research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Dr Hughes was supported during the majority of this work by a capacity-building grant from the Emergency Medicine Foundation (EMCB-402R23), and a Research Summer Scholarship from the University of Queensland supported Ms Wong to work on this project. ConflictFunding StatementThis research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Dr Hughes was supported during the majority of this work by a capacity-building grant from the Emergency Medicine Foundation (EMCB-402R23), and a Research Summer Scholarship from the University of Queensland supported Ms Wong to work on this project. ConflictAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This prospective psychometric evaluation of the APS-POQ-R in adult ED patients with moderate to severe acute pain was conducted at the Emergency and Trauma Centre at Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Australia and approved by the hospital's Human Research Ethics Committee (LNR/2019/QRBW/55143). All participants provided written informed consent.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData from this study is not available as the patients recruited did not give permission for data sharing. ER -