RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Testing an analogue game to promote peer support and person-centredness in education for people with type 2 diabetes: a realist evaluation
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.09.14.20185769
DO 10.1101/2020.09.14.20185769
A1 Vibeke Stenov
A1 Pil Lindgreen
A1 Ingrid Willaing
A1 Henning Grubb Basballe
A1 Lene Eide Joensen
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/15/2020.09.14.20185769.abstract
AB Aim To explore the outcomes of testing an analogue game to incorporate person-centredness and peer dialogues in group-based diabetes education targeting people with type 2 diabetesDesign A quasi-experimental design inspired by realistic evaluation focusing on context, mechanisms and outcomes of the interventionMethods In March-July 2019, the game was tested among 76 people with type 2 diabetes and 17 healthcare professionals in 19 settings across nine Danish municipalities. Data consisted of audio recordings, individual and group interviews and questionnaires. Data were analysed using systematic text condensation and descriptive statistics.Results Outcomes of using the analogue game in diabetes education were: 1) a playful and relaxed atmosphere; 2) active engagement 3) reflections on diabetes-specific experiences; 4) structured and focused dialogues; 5) healthcare professionals gaining insight into the preferences and needs of participants; and 6) healthcare professionals experiencing peer dialogue as important to incorporate into education. Questionnaire responses showed that 92% of people with type 2 diabetes and 94% of healthcare professionals found that the game incorporated person-centredness and peer dialogues into diabetes education.Conclusion Implementing the analogue game as part of patient education facilitated peer support and person-centredness in a fun and playful way. Lack of time in diabetes education programmes and complicated game rules inhibited person-centeredness and peer dialogue.ImpactThe study provides novel insights into gaming as a method for promoting peer dialogue and person-centredness in diabetes education targeting people with type 2 diabetes.The game proved feasible as a structured tool to implement in group-based diabetes education.Implementing the game in diabetes education can help healthcare professionals provide diabetes education and support, which may improve quality of life and diabetes self-management skills.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialThe study is registerd at Center for Open Science with the following identifier: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/ZHJ5EFunding StatementFinancial support to conduct the study was provided by Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen. No external funding was received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Data Protection Agency (project ID: VD-2018-157) and conducted according to the Helsinki Declaration (WMA General Assembly, 2018, July 9) and current Danish legislation.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.