RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Perceptions and Attitudes of Prison Staff towards ADHD – double jeopardy for inmates affected
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.09.14.20183152
DO 10.1101/2020.09.14.20183152
A1 Anna Buadze
A1 Nadine Friedl
A1 Roman Schleifer
A1 Susan Young
A1 Andres Schneeberger
A1 Michael Liebrenz
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/15/2020.09.14.20183152.abstract
AB Background Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder that is associated with risk-taking behaviors, poor self-control and interpersonal difficulties. Affected individuals have an increased probability of involvement in the criminal justice system, contributing to a higher rate of arrest and imprisonment compared with the general population. Current data on the prevalence of ADHD among prisoners reports rates of 26%, but finds them inadequately treated.Aims Because prison staff play a central role in the identification of inmates with mental disorders, they could well be key to improving provision of care. There is however little knowledge of the conceptions, perceptions and attitudes of prison staff towards ADHD. Such information could help to identify starting points for awareness training and to further implementation of specific ADHD treatment.Methods To bridge this gap, we employed a qualitatively driven mixed methods design combining qualitative data collection in the form of narrative interviews with 19 prison staff from a Swiss correctional facility with quantitative data collection in the form of a survey that included the Attitudes Toward Prisoners scale. The interviews were analyzed with QSR NVIVO 11 and a qualitative content analysis approach was used to evaluate findings.Results Prison staff were generally aware of ADHD and its symptomology, believed it to a be “real”, but “fashionable” disorder and favored hereditary-genetic or biological explanatory models for its development. They viewed inmates with ADHD rather negatively, as complicating correctional efforts, perceived them as sticking out, as tying up more resources and as frequently being involved in confrontations. Our findings suggest that difficulties in pragmatic aspects of communication and language comprehension may be perceived “as not listening or following instructions” creating additional tensions. Consequently, inmates with ADHD are more often exposed to disciplinary sanctions, such as solitary confinement - an intervention deemed “necessary” by staff. Therefore, staff training on ADHD might need to cover evidence on adverse effects. Non-pharmacological interventions for treatment were preferred and considered to be highly efficacious. Skepticism towards pharmacological treatment prevailed, even when benefits from stimulant medication were described. Acceptance of multimodal treatment among prison staff may require customized strategies.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNot a clinical trial.Funding StatementThe authors received no external funding for this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The research was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and was authorized by the independent ethics committee (IEC) of the faculty of Human Sciences of the University of Bern. All participants were assured confidentiality, and gave their written informed consent for the study and, specifically, for the digital recordings of the interviews.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesExcerpts of the transcripts relevant to the study are available on substantiated request from the corresponding author.