PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Brooks-Pollock, Ellen AU - Christensen, Hannah AU - Trickey, Adam AU - Hemani, Gibran AU - Nixon, Emily AU - Thomas, Amy AU - Turner, Katy AU - Finn, Adam AU - Hickman, Matt AU - Relton, Caroline AU - Danon, Leon TI - High COVID-19 transmission potential associated with re-opening universities can be mitigated with layered interventions AID - 10.1101/2020.09.10.20189696 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.09.10.20189696 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/11/2020.09.10.20189696.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/11/2020.09.10.20189696.full AB - Background Re-opening universities while controlling COVID-19 transmission poses unique challenges. UK universities typically host 20,000 to 40,000 undergraduate students, with the majority moving away from home to attend. In the absence of realistic mixing patterns, previous models suggest that outbreaks associated with universities re-opening are an eventuality.Methods We developed a stochastic transmission model based on realistic mixing patterns between students. We evaluated alternative mitigation interventions for a representative university.Results Our model predicts, for a set of plausible parameter values, that if asymptomatic cases are half as infectious as symptomatic cases then 5,760 (3,940 – 7,430) out of 28,000 students, 20% (14% – 26%), could be infected during the first term, with 950 (656 – 1,209) cases infectious on the last day of term. If asymptomatic cases are as infectious as symptomatic cases then three times as many cases could occur, with 94% (93% – 94%) of the student population getting infected during the first term. We predict that one third of infected students are likely to be in their first year, and first year students are the main drivers of transmission due to high numbers of contacts in communal residences. We find that reducing face-to-face teaching is likely to be the single most effective intervention, and this conclusion is robust to varying assumptions about asymptomatic transmission. Supplementing reduced face-to-face testing with COVID-secure interactions and reduced living circles could reduce the percentage of infected students by 75%. Mass testing of students would need to occur at least fortnightly, is not the most effective option considered, and comes at a cost of high numbers of students requiring self-isolation. When transmission is controlled in the student population, limiting imported infection from the community is important.Conclusions Priority should be given to understanding the role of asymptomatic transmission in the spread of COVID-19. Irrespective of assumptions about asymptomatic transmission, our findings suggest that additional outbreak control measures should be considered for the university setting. These might include reduced face-to-face teaching, management of student mixing and enhanced testing. Onward transmission to family members at the end of term is likely without interventions.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementLD and EBP are supported by Medical Research Council (MRC) (MC/PC/19067) and LD is supported by The Alan Turing Institute EPSRC EP/N510129/1. EBP, HC, KT and MH acknowledge support from the NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation at the University of Bristol. The Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Behavioural Science and Evaluation at University of Bristol is part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and a partnership between University of Bristol and Public Health England (PHE), in collaboration with the MRC Biostatistics Unit at University of Cambridge and University of the West of England. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study complied with the University of Bristol data protection policy for research studies (http://www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/secretary/documents/information-governance/data-protection-policy.pdf).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesContact the corresponding author regarding the data used for modelling.