TY - JOUR T1 - Estimation and Removal of spurious echo Artifacts in single-voxel MRS using Sensitivity Encoding JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.09.09.20191460 SP - 2020.09.09.20191460 AU - Adam Berrington AU - Michal Považan AU - Peter B Barker Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/11/2020.09.09.20191460.abstract N2 - Purpose In localized MR spectroscopy, spurious echo artifacts commonly occur when unsuppressed signal outside the volume-of-interest is exicted and refocused. In the spectral domain, these signals often overlap with metabolite resonances and hinder accurate quantification. Since the artifacts orginate from regions separate from the target MRS voxel, this work proposes that sensitivity encoding based on receive coil sensitivity profiles may be used to separate these signal contributions.Methods Numerical simulations were performed to explore the effect of sensitivity encoded separation for unknown artifact regions. An imaging-based approach was developed to identify regions that may contribute to spurious echo artifacts, and tested for sensitivity-based unfolding of signal contribution on 6 datasets from 3 brain regions. Spectral data reconstructed using the proposed method (‘ERASE’) were compared to standard coil combination.Results The method was able to fully separate metabolite and artifact signals if regions were known a priori. Mismatch between estimated and actual artifact locations reduced the efficiency of artifact removal. Water suppression imaging (WSI) was able to identify unsuppressed signal remote from the MRS voxel in all cases, and ERASE reconstruction (of up to 8 distinct locations) led to improvements in spectral quality and reduced fitting errors for the major metabolites compared to standard reconstruction, without significant degradation of spectral SNR.Conclusion The ERASE reconstruction tool was demonstrated to reduce spurious echo artifacts in single voxel MRS. ERASE may be incorporated into standard MRS workflows to improve spectral quality when scanner hardware limitations or other factors result in out-of-voxel signal contamination.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work supported in part by NIH P41EB015909.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Local IRB board at Johns Hopkins UniversityAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesRelevant data and functions relating to data processing will be made publicly available on online repository ER -