RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Retrospective study on the clinicogenomic characteristics of EGFR mutant and wildtype NSCLC JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2020.08.07.20170027 DO 10.1101/2020.08.07.20170027 A1 Chirag Dhar YR 2020 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/11/2020.08.07.20170027.abstract AB Background Lung cancer is among the leading causes of mortality. Nearly 90% of all lung cancers are histologically classified as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A subset of these tumors harbor mutations on the epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) and such patients are candidates for targeted therapy with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs).Aim To compare and contrast the clinicogenomic characteristics of EGFR mutant and wildtype NSCLC.Methods and results A retrospective cohort study design was used to analyze publicly available data on cBioPortal.org. Patients with EGFR mutations were more likely to be female, of Asian ethnicity, never-smokers, and diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma. Metastasis to the pleura, pleural fluid, and liver were common in patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC. On the other hand, lymph node, brain and adrenal gland metastases were more common in patients with other mutations. While the median overall survival was about the same in the two groups, progression free survival was significantly shorter in the EGFR mutant group. The mutational landscape was significantly different in the two groups with EGFR mutant NSCLCs having a lower mutational burden. Differences in copy number alterations between the two groups were also noted.Conclusions The clinicogenomic profiles of EGFR mutant and EGFR wildtype significantly differ. Further studies on these differences and underlying mechanisms are likely to lead to new “druggable” targets that overcome EGFR TKI resistance.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementCD recieced a CREST M.A.S scholarship from ACTRI.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:IRB exempt.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll necessary data are included in the manuscript.