TY - JOUR T1 - A multi-centre prospective study of COVID-19 transmission following outpatient Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in the United Kingdom JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.08.02.20166736 SP - 2020.08.02.20166736 AU - Bu’Hussain Hayee AU - The SCOTS project group AU - James E. East AU - Colin Rees AU - Ian Penman Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/11/2020.08.02.20166736.abstract N2 - Message The COVID-19 pandemic has severely curtailed the practice of endoscopy (as an exemplar for outpatient diagnostic procedures) worldwide. Restart and recovery processes will be influenced by the need to protect patients and staff from disease transmission, but data on the risk of COVID-19 transmission after endoscopy are sparse. This is of particular importance in later pandemic phases when the risk of harm from delayed or missed significant diagnoses is likely to far outweigh the risk of infection. The British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guidance for restarting endoscopy included stratification of diagnostic procedures according to aerosol generation or assessment of infectious risk as well as pragmatic guidance on the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). We sought to document the risk of COVID-19 transmission after endoscopy in this “COVID-minimised” environment. Prospective data were collected from 18 UK centres for n=6208 procedures. Pre-endoscopy, 3/2611 (0.11% [95% CI: 0.00-0.33%]) asymptomatic patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on nasopharyngeal swab. Based on follow-up telephone symptom screening of patients at 7 and 14 days, no cases of COVID-19 were detected by any centre after endoscopy in either patients or staff. While these data cannot determine the relative contribution of each component of a COVID-minimised pathway, they provide clear support for such an approach. The rational use of PPE and infection control policies should be continued and will aid planning for outpatient diagnostics in the COVID-19 recovery phase.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialThis study was performed as a service evaluation as part of routine care and had no impact on patient care, nor were identifiable data used, analysed or transferred. A review by the departmental review board waived the need for ethical approval and trial registration on these groundsFunding StatementNo authors received payment from a third party for any of the work included in this manuscript. Other Declarations of Interest are included at the end of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:King's Gastroenterology Research Governance CommitteeAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesN/A ER -