RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Evaluation of DISORDER: retrospective image motion correction for volumetric brain MRI in a pediatric setting JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2020.09.09.20190777 DO 10.1101/2020.09.09.20190777 A1 Katy Vecchiato A1 Alexia Egloff A1 Olivia Carney A1 Ata Siddiqui A1 Emer Hughes A1 Louise Dillon A1 Kathleen Colford A1 Elaine Green A1 Rui Pedro A.G. Texeria A1 Anthony N. Price A1 Giulio Ferrazzi A1 Joseph V. Hajnal A1 David W Carmichael A1 Lucilio Cordero-Grande A1 Jonathan O’Muircheartaigh YR 2020 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/10/2020.09.09.20190777.abstract AB Background and Purpose Head motion causes image degradation in brain MRI examinations, negatively impacting image quality, especially in pediatric populations. Here, we used a retrospective motion correction technique in children and assessed image quality improvement for 3D MRI acquisitions.Material and Methods We prospectively acquired brain MRI at 3T using 3D sequences, T1-weighted MPRAGE, T2-weighted Turbo Spin Echo and FLAIR, in 32 unsedated children, including 7 with epilepsy (age range 2–18 years). We implemented a novel motion correction technique: Distributed and Incoherent Sample Orders for Reconstruction Deblurring using Encoding Redundancy (DISORDER). For each subject and modality, we obtained 3 reconstructions: as acquired (Aq), after DISORDER motion correction (Di), and Di with additional outlier rejection (DiOut).We analyzed 288 images quantitatively, measuring 2 objective no-reference image quality metrics: Gradient Entropy (GE) and MPRAGE White Matter Homogeneity (WM-H). As a qualitative metric, we presented blinded and randomized images to 2 expert neuroradiologists who scored them for clinical readability.Results Both image quality metrics improved after motion correction for all modalities and improvement correlated with the amount of intrascan motion. Neuroradiologists also considered the motion corrected images as of higher quality (Wilcoxon’s z = −3.164 MPRAGE, z = −2.066 TSE, z = −2.645 FLAIR, for all p < 0.05).Conclusions Retrospective image motion correction with DISORDER increased image quality both from an objective and qualitative perspective. In 75% of sessions, at least one sequence was improved by this approach, indicating the benefit of this technique in unsedated children for both clinical and research environments.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialCPMS40005Funding StatementThis research received funding from a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society (Grant Number 206675/Z/17/Z). The study was also supported in part by the Wellcome Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Centre for Medical Engineering at King s College London (grant WT 203148/Z/16/Z), the Medical Research Council (UK) (grants MR/K006355/1 and MR/LO11530/1) and Medical Research Council Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, King s College London (MR/N026063/1). Infrastructure support was provided by the National Institute for Health Research Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at South London, Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, King s College London, the National Institute for Health Research Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at Guys, and St Thomas Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Approval for this study was obtained by the Health Research Authority (HRA) and Health and Care Research Wales (HCRW), ethics ref 18/LO/1766.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesCode used in this analysis and derived data that support the conclusions of this study are available on request.DISORDERDistributed and Incoherent Sample Orders for Reconstruction Deblurring using Encoding RedundancyMPRAGEMagnetization Prepared Rapid Acquisition Gradient EchoFLAIRFluid Attenuated Inversion RecoveryTSETurbo Spin-EchoGEGradient EntropyWM-HWhite Matter Homogeneity