RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the Adapted Short QUestionnaire to ASsess Health-enhancing physical activity (Adapted-SQUASH) in adults with disabilities
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.09.09.20190371
DO 10.1101/2020.09.09.20190371
A1 Bregje L. Seves
A1 Femke Hoekstra
A1 Jorrit W.A. Schoenmakers
A1 Pim Brandenbarg
A1 Trynke Hoekstra
A1 Florentina J. Hettinga
A1 Rienk Dekker
A1 Lucas H.V. van der Woude
A1 Cees P. van der Schans
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/09/2020.09.09.20190371.abstract
AB The current study determined the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the Adapted Short QUestionnaire to ASsess Health-enhancing physical activity (Adapted-SQUASH) in adults with disabilities. Before filling in the Adapted-SQUASH twice with a recall period of two weeks, participants wore the Actiheart activity monitor up to one week. For the test-retest reliability (N = 68), Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were 0.67 (p < 0.001) for the total activity score (min x intensity/week) and 0.76 (p< 0.001) for the total minutes of activity (min/week). For the concurrent validity (N = 58), the Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.40 (p = 0.002) between the total activity score of the first administration of the Adapted-SQUASH and activity energy expenditure from the Actiheart (kcals kg−1 min−1). The ICC was 0.22 (p = 0.027) between the total minutes of activity assessed with the first administration of the Adapted-SQUASH and Actiheart. The Adapted-SQUASH is an acceptable measure to assess self-reported physical activity in large populations of adults with disabilities, but is not applicable at the individual level due to wide limits of agreement. Self-reported physical activity assessed with the Adapted-SQUASH does not accurately represent physical activity assessed with the Actiheart in adults with disabilities, as indicated with a systematic bias between both instruments in the Bland-Altman analysis.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study is funded by Stichting Beatrixoord Noord-Nederland and a personal grant received from the University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen (grant date 1-9-2018).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Center of Human Movement Sciences (ECB/2014.06.30_1) at the University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data referred to in the manuscript is not yet available.