RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Detecting sleep in free-living conditions without sleep-diaries: a device-agnostic, wearable heart rate sensing approach
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.09.05.20188367
DO 10.1101/2020.09.05.20188367
A1 Ignacio Perez-Pozuelo
A1 Marius Posa
A1 Dimitris Spathis
A1 Kate Westgate
A1 Nicholas Wareham
A1 Cecilia Mascolo
A1 Søren Brage
A1 Joao Palotti
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/08/2020.09.05.20188367.abstract
AB Study Objectives The rise of multisensor wearable devices offers a unique opportunity for the objective inference of sleep outside laboratories, enabling longitudinal monitoring in large populations. To enhance objectivity and facilitate cross-cohort comparisons, sleep detection algorithms in free-living conditions should rely on personalized but device-agnostic features, which can be applied without laborious human annotations or sleep diaries. We developed and validated a heart rate-based algorithm that captures inter- and intra-individual sleep differences, does not require human input and can be applied in free-living conditions.Methods The algorithm was evaluated across four study cohorts using different research- and consumer-grade devices for over 2,000 nights. Recording periods included both 24-hour free-living and conventional lab-based night-only data. Our method was systematically optimized and validated against polysomnography (PSG) and sleep diaries and compared to sleep periods produced by accelerometry-based angular change algorithms.Results We evaluated our approach in four cohorts comprising two free-living studies with detailed sleep diaries and two PSG studies. In the free-living studies, the algorithm yielded a mean squared error (MSE) of 0.06 to 0.07 and a total sleep time deviation of −0.60 to −14.08 minutes. In the laboratory studies, the MSE ranged between 0.06 and 0.10 yielding a time deviation between −23.23 and −33.15 minutes.Conclusions Our results suggest that our heart rate-based algorithm can reliably and objectively infer sleep under longitudinal, free-living conditions, independent of the wearable device used. This represents the first open-source algorithm to leverage heart rate data for inferring sleep without requiring sleep diaries or annotations.Statement of significance Sleep studies in free-living conditions are becoming easier to scale due to advances in sensor technology and affordability of consumer-grade wearables. Adoption has been driven by interest in long-term health monitoring, with incentives for person-generated health data insights. Historically, sleep classification algorithms have been trained on manually annotated records from selected cohorts with monophasic, night-time sleep data. Cultural preferences and shift work mean standard approaches might fail to reveal unbiased insights over 24-hour free-living conditions. We leverage the heart rate signal recorded by most state-of-the-art wearables and evaluated our device- and annotation-agnostic labeling approach across four separate study populations against gold-standard PSG or sleep diaries. Results show that heart rate-derived labels preserve the accuracy demanded in clinical sleep studies without the need for effort-intensive human annotations. This has potential applications in longitudinal studies and personalized medicine.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this work. Our work was supported by GlaxoSmithKline and EPSRC through an iCase fellowship (17100053), the Embiricos Trust Scholarship of Jesus College Cambridge, and EPSRC through Grant DTP (EP/N509620/1). The work of KW is supported by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (IS-BRC-1215-20014). The icons used in some of the figures are licensed under Creative Commons by thenounproject.com.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval for the BBVS study was obtained from Cambridge University Human Biology Research Ethics Committee (Ref: HBREC/2015.16). All participants provided written informed consent. All data used from the MESA Sleep Ancillary study used in this work is publicly available from the National Sleep Research Resource repository. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained ateach MESA study site (Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Univer-sity of Minnesota, Columbia University, University of California Los Angeles and the Johns HopkinsUniversity). All participants provided written informed consent. The IRB for the Physionet Apple Watch study was approved by the University of Michigan Review Board and all participants provided written informed consent. Finally, for the MMASH study, all participants provided written informed consent. Information was provided to them regarding the research protocol in accordance with General Data Protection Regulation: Regulation - EU2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council 27/04/2016. Further, all experiments conducted were in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration as revised in 2013, the study was approvedby the Ethical Committee of the University of Pisa (#0077455/2018).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData for 3 out of the 4 datasets used in this work is freely available on the Internet.